Effect of Lower Pneumoperitoneum Pressure During Laparoscopic and Robotic Hysterectomy
The Effect of Lower Pneumoperitoneum Pressure During Laparoscopic and Robotic Hysterectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
With the limited evidence that lower pneumoperitoneum pressures improve postoperative pain in laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy for benign indications, we would like to determine if we can both further validate this idea but also show that it has minimal effect on physician satisfaction performing the surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2020
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 29, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 14, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 3, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 30, 2021
CompletedDecember 7, 2021
December 1, 2021
1.6 years
July 29, 2019
December 4, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Physician Satisfaction Part 1
Physician satisfaction questionnaire completed immediately postoperative, 3 questions in length and measured with VAS score (0-5)
From completion of surgery to one hour postoperative
Physician Satisfaction Part 2
Included in the physician satisfaction questionnaire is presumed pneumoperitoneum pressure, measured as 10mmHg, 12mmHg, or 15mmHg (circle one - 10mmHg, 12mmHg, 15mmHg)
From completion of surgery to one hour postoperative
Physician Satisfaction Part 3
Included in the physician satisfaction questionnaire are two yes/no questions on effect of pneumoperitoneum on visualization and operative time (circle one - yes, no)
From completion of surgery to one hour postoperative
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Postoperative Pain
From completion of surgery to 24 hours postoperative
Postoperative Shoulder Pain
From completion of surgery to 24 hours postoperative
Other Outcomes (6)
Narcotic usage
From completion of surgery to 24 hours postoperative
Length of hospital stay
From completion of surgery to hospital discharge time up to 7 days
Patient Satisfaction
From completion of surgery to 24 hours postoperative
- +3 more other outcomes
Study Arms (3)
1. Pneumoperitoneum pressure = 15mmHg
ACTIVE COMPARATOR1\. Pneumoperitoneum will be set at 15mmHg
2. Pneumoperitoneum pressure = 12mmHg
ACTIVE COMPARATOR2.Pneumoperitoneum will be set at 12mmHg
3. Pneumoperitoneum set at 10mmHg
ACTIVE COMPARATOR3\. Pneumoperitoneum will be set at 10mmHg
Interventions
Randomized pneumoperitoneum 1
Randomized pneumoperitoneum 2
Randomized pneumoperitoneum 3
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- female patients
- greater than or equal to 18 years old
- English-speaking
- undergoing laparoscopic or robotic total hysterectomy for benign indications by one of the two minimally invasive gynecologic surgeons at Banner University Medical Center - Phoenix
You may not qualify if:
- patients with body max index \>35
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score III or IV
- preoperative uterine weight estimated to be greater than 500gm (measured by sonography and using the following formula: length x width x anteroposterior diameter x 0.52)
- patients on chronic opioids for chronic pain (defined as \> 3 months regular opioid use)
- patients who refuse participation in the study
- patients who do not provide informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Banner University Medical Center Phoenix
Phoenix, Arizona, 85006, United States
Related Publications (6)
Kyle EB, Maheux-Lacroix S, Boutin A, Laberge PY, Lemyre M. Low vs Standard Pressures in Gynecologic Laparoscopy: a Systematic Review. JSLS. 2016 Jan-Mar;20(1):e2015.00113. doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2015.00113.
PMID: 26955258BACKGROUNDBogani G, Uccella S, Cromi A, Serati M, Casarin J, Pinelli C, Ghezzi F. Low vs standard pneumoperitoneum pressure during laparoscopic hysterectomy: prospective randomized trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 May-Jun;21(3):466-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.12.091. Epub 2013 Dec 25.
PMID: 24374246BACKGROUNDSroussi J, Elies A, Rigouzzo A, Louvet N, Mezzadri M, Fazel A, Benifla JL. Low pressure gynecological laparoscopy (7mmHg) with AirSeal(R) System versus a standard insufflation (15mmHg): A pilot study in 60 patients. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2017 Feb;46(2):155-158. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2016.09.003. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
PMID: 28403972BACKGROUND3. Kim DK, Cheong ILY, Lee GY, Cho JH. Low pressure (8 mm Hg) pneumoperitoneum does not reduce the incidence and severity of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) following gynecologic laparoscopy. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2006.
BACKGROUNDTopcu HO, Cavkaytar S, Kokanali K, Guzel AI, Islimye M, Doganay M. A prospective randomized trial of postoperative pain following different insufflation pressures during gynecologic laparoscopy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Nov;182:81-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.09.003. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
PMID: 25265495BACKGROUNDNasajiyan N, Javaherfourosh F, Ghomeishi A, Akhondzadeh R, Pazyar F, Hamoonpou N. Comparison of low and standard pressure gas injection at abdominal cavity on postoperative nausea and vomiting in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Pak J Med Sci. 2014 Sep;30(5):1083-7. doi: 10.12669/pjms.305.5010.
PMID: 25225531BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Michael Foley, MD
Banner University Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Research coordinator will have randomized the patient into one of the 3 arms. The randomized pneumoperitoneum pressure will be set for the surgical procedure and blinded to the surgeon and first assistant, either fellow or resident.
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Rachael Smith, DO Fellow Minimally Invasive Gynecology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 29, 2019
First Posted
October 14, 2019
Study Start
March 3, 2020
Primary Completion
September 30, 2021
Study Completion
November 30, 2021
Last Updated
December 7, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Data will be available within 6 months of study completion
- Access Criteria
- Data access requests will be reviewed by an external independent review panel. Requesters will be required to sign a data access agreement.
De-identifed individual participant data for all primary and secondary outcomes measures will be made available.