The Aortix CRS Pilot Study
An Evaluation of the Safety and Performance of the Aortix System for Intra-Aortic Mechanical Circulatory Support in Patients With Cardiorenal Syndrome
1 other identifier
interventional
21
2 countries
19
Brief Summary
The Aortix CRS Pilot Study: An Evaluation of the Safety and Performance of the Aortix System for Intra-Aortic Mechanical Circulatory Support in Patients with Cardiorenal Syndrome
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2021
Typical duration for not_applicable
19 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 25, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 30, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 5, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 7, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 9, 2023
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 17, 2024
CompletedApril 17, 2024
April 1, 2024
1.7 years
October 25, 2019
October 20, 2023
April 8, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
Serious Adverse Events
Rate of Occurrence of Serious Adverse Events (rate will be calculated and reported)
30 days
Serious Procedure Related Adverse Events
Rate of Occurrence of Serious Procedure Related Adverse Events (rate will be calculated and reported)
30 days
Device Performance
Deployment and retrieval procedures success rates (rates will be calculated and reported).
7 days
Device Performance
Rate of occurrence of ADS, ARS and pump device-related adverse events (includes device malfunctions) (rate will be calculated and reported)
30 days
Effectiveness
Clinically significant decongestion as measured by the PA catheter. % of patients with a decrease in either CVP or PCWP of \> 20%.
7 days
Urine Output
Change in Urine Output Assessed as the hourly rate of urine output before pump placed vs hourly rate of urine output over the Aortix therapy period (until congestion target met or therapy deemed ineffective)
7 day period starting from implant
NT-pro-BNP (Brain Natriuretic Peptide)
Change in NT-pro-BNP (pre-implant vs when congestion target is met or therapy deemed ineffective)
7 days
Study Arms (1)
Aortix Device
EXPERIMENTALAortix Pump, Aortix Delivery System, Introducer Set, Aortix Control System, Aortix Retrieval System
Interventions
Aortix is a circulatory support device for chronic heart failure patients on medical management who have been hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) with worsening renal function.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \) Admitted to the hospital with a primary diagnosis of acute decompensated heart failure, either heart failure with reduced or preserved ejection fraction (HFrEF, HFpEF or HFmEF);
- \) Worsening renal function (serum creatinine increase by ≥0.3 mg/dl \[≥27 μmol/L\]) despite 48 hours of intravenous diuretic therapy Increase can be compared to a baseline value taken within 90 days of hospitalization or during hospitalization;
- \) Objective measure of congestion (Elevated PCWP \[≥20 mmHg\] OR Elevated CVP \[≥12 mmHg\]) obtained via catheter measurement;
- \) Persistent clinical signs and/or symptoms of congestion despite diuretic therapy (one or more of the following):
- dyspnea at rest or with minimal exertion,
- paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea,
- orthopnea,
- lower extremity edema (≥2+),
- elevated jugular venous pressure,
- pulmonary rales,
- enlarged liver or ascites,
- pulmonary vascular congestion on chest x-ray;
- \) Age \>21 years.
You may not qualify if:
- \) Treatment with high dose IV inotropes within the last 48 hours. High dose is defined as \> 1 unit of inotrope (excluding digoxin) as follows: 5 µg/kg/min dopamine = 1 unit, 5 µg/kg/min dobutamine= 1 unit, 0.375 µg/kg/min milrinone = 1 unit, (for example, dopamine 2.5 µg/kg/min + dobutamine 2.5 µg/kg/min = 1 unit; dobutamine 2.5 µg/kg/min + milrinone 0.1875 µg/kg/min = 1 unit);
- \) Active and ongoing hypotension defined as a systolic blood pressure \< 90 mmHg lasting more than 30 minutes or a mean arterial pressure (MAP) \< 60 mmHg lasting more than 30 minutes;
- \) Acute Kidney Failure defined as increase in serum creatinine to ≥4.0 mg/dL (≥353.6 μmol/L) within the last 48 hours;
- \) Exposure to intravenous contrast, aminoglycosides or high dose NSAIDS in the 48 hours before enrollment;
- \) Known or suspected contrast induced nephropathy;
- \) Prior kidney transplant, isolated single kidney, stage V Chronic Kidney Disease (eGFR ≤15) at admission OR use of dialysis, continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) or aquapheresis (ultrafiltration) in last 90 days;
- \) Urologic intervention (except indwelling urinary (Foley) catheter)) within the last 7 days;
- \) Known cirrhosis or shock liver;
- \) Presence of an active infection;
- \) Prior heart transplant in the last 2 years, heart failure due to rejection of a previous heart transplant, planned heart transplantation before the 30-day follow-up visit;
- \) Current or previous support with a durable LVAD at any time or use of an intra-aortic balloon pump, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), or percutaneous ventricular assist devices (e.g. Impella or TandemHeart) currently or within the last 30 days;
- \) Patient has known hypo- or hyper coaguable state such as disseminated intravascular coagulation or heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT);
- \) Known cardiac amyloidosis;
- \) Acute myocardial infarction Type 1 within 30 days of enrollment, or planned coronary revascularization;
- \) Stroke within 30 days of enrollment;
- +13 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Procyrionlead
- Procyrion Australia Pty Ltdcollaborator
Study Sites (19)
University of Southern California
Los Angeles, California, 90033, United States
University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, California, 94143, United States
University of Colorado
Denver, Colorado, 80045, United States
University of Florida
Gainesville, Florida, 32610, United States
University of South Florida
Tampa, Florida, 33620, United States
Cleveland Clinic Florida
Weston, Florida, 33331, United States
University of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60637, United States
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States
Henry Ford Health System
Detroit, Michigan, 48202, United States
Columbia University/New York Presbyterian
New York, New York, 10032, United States
Christ Hospital
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219, United States
Houston Methodist
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Inova Health Care Services
Falls Church, Virginia, 20042, United States
Sentara Hospital
Norfolk, Virginia, 23502, United States
St. Vincent's Hospital
Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Prince Charles Hospital
Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Royal Adelaide Hospital
Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
The Alfred Hospital
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Western Health, Footscray Hospital
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Related Publications (1)
Cowger JA, Basir MB, Baran DA, Hayward CS, Rangaswami J, Walton A, Tita C, Minear S, Hakemi E, Klein L, Cheng R, Wu R, Mohanty BD, Heuring JJ, Neely E, Shah P; Aortix CRS Pilot Study Investigators. Safety and Performance of the Aortix Device in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure and Cardiorenal Syndrome. JACC Heart Fail. 2023 Nov;11(11):1565-1575. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2023.06.018. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
PMID: 37804307DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Larger samples and a study powered to allow comparison with SOC is needed to confirm decongestion and renal benefits from IAEP and to identify a HF pt group that would benefit the most. An 18F sheath is required for device deployment, pts require systemic anticoagulation, and ICU monitoring was required. The implant procedure should be validated with various operators; the efficacy, performance, and safety of IAEP should be studied in a RCT; and consider extra costs of therapy vs pt outcomes.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Rubi Reyes-Fuentez, Clinical Research Associate II
- Organization
- Procyrion, Inc.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 25, 2019
First Posted
October 30, 2019
Study Start
February 5, 2021
Primary Completion
October 7, 2022
Study Completion
March 9, 2023
Last Updated
April 17, 2024
Results First Posted
April 17, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share