NCT04144686

Brief Summary

Vestibular rehabilitation therapy (VRT) is an exercise-based programme to encourage central nervous system (CNS) compensation for vestibular dysfunction. There is moderate to strong evidence to support VRT as a safe, effective management in reducing dizziness, vertigo, associated falls and improving quality of life in people with a unilateral and bilateral peripheral vestibular disorder. However, the evidence to discriminate between differing forms of treatment is unclear and, although, approximately 50% to 80% of persons with a vestibular dysfunction achieve significant subjective symptom, gait, dynamic visual acuity and postural stability improvements, full recovery is less common for reasons that currently remain unknown. Thus, further studies are required to identify optimal VRT approaches. The purpose of this investigation is to identify if the incorporation of dual-task (DT) exercises into a customised VRT programme will have an effect on treatment outcomes in persons with chronic vestibular disorders.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
48

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2019

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 24, 2019

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 28, 2019

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 30, 2019

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2020

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

November 7, 2019

Status Verified

July 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

October 28, 2019

Last Update Submit

November 5, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

Vestibulardual-taskingGaitrehabilitationdizziness

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Functional Gait Assessment

    The primary outcome is the Functional Gait Assessment which is a 10-item test that assesses performance on complex gait tasks (i.e. walking with head turns, stepping over an obstacle or stopping and turning). Scores range from 0 to 30. The highest score is 30 and greater outcomes are indicative of better performance while lower scores are indicative of poorer performance. The Functional Gait Assessment has been validated in healthy people, older adults with a history of falls and balance impairments, and people with a vestibular disorder. The minimal detectable change for Functional Gait Assessment is reported to be 6 points in persons with balance and vestibular disorders. Scores ≤22/30 identify fall risk and are predictable of falls in community-living older persons within 6 months.

    10 minutes

Secondary Outcomes (17)

  • Functional Gait Dual-Task Test

    45 minutes

  • Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test

    10 minutes

  • Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery

    50 minutes

  • Montreal Cognitive Assessment Tool

    5 minutes

  • Speech in Babble Test

    10 minutes

  • +12 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Group A

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Vestibular participants undertaking a single-task vestibular rehabilitation

Other: Physiotherapy Rehabilitation

Group B

EXPERIMENTAL

Vestibular participants undertaking a dual-task vestibular rehabilitation

Other: Physiotherapy Rehabilitation

Interventions

Participants will be randomly allocated, using a random number generator, to a 12-week supervised customised exercise group incorporating VRT programme without (Group A) or with cognitive DT exercises (Group B).

Group AGroup B

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • clinical diagnosis of a peripheral vestibular disorder
  • chronic dizziness and/or unsteadiness
  • to 80 years' old
  • previous vestibular rehabilitation programme completed with partial/no improvement
  • willing to participate and to comply with the proposed training and testing regime

You may not qualify if:

  • Persons with
  • central nervous system involvement, excluding migraine
  • fluctuating symptoms, for example, active Ménière disease
  • acute orthopaedic disorders influencing balance control and gait
  • a score of \< 23/30 on the MoCA
  • a score of \>15/21 on the HADS for the depression component indicating significant depression symptoms
  • inability to attend sessions
  • lack of a good grasp of written/spoken English will be excluded.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

King's College London

London, SE1 1UL, United Kingdom

RECRUITING

Related Publications (41)

  • Hall CD, Herdman SJ, Whitney SL, Cass SP, Clendaniel RA, Fife TD, Furman JM, Getchius TS, Goebel JA, Shepard NT, Woodhouse SN. Vestibular Rehabilitation for Peripheral Vestibular Hypofunction: An Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline: FROM THE AMERICAN PHYSICAL THERAPY ASSOCIATION NEUROLOGY SECTION. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2016 Apr;40(2):124-55. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0000000000000120.

  • Smith PF. Age-Related Neurochemical Changes in the Vestibular Nuclei. Front Neurol. 2016 Mar 3;7:20. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2016.00020. eCollection 2016.

  • Topuz O, Topuz B, Ardic FN, Sarhus M, Ogmen G, Ardic F. Efficacy of vestibular rehabilitation on chronic unilateral vestibular dysfunction. Clin Rehabil. 2004 Feb;18(1):76-83. doi: 10.1191/0269215504cr704oa.

  • Arnold SA, Stewart AM, Moor HM, Karl RC, Reneker JC. The Effectiveness of Vestibular Rehabilitation Interventions in Treating Unilateral Peripheral Vestibular Disorders: A Systematic Review. Physiother Res Int. 2017 Jul;22(3). doi: 10.1002/pri.1635. Epub 2015 Jun 25.

  • Lacour M, Bernard-Demanze L, Dumitrescu M. Posture control, aging, and attention resources: models and posture-analysis methods. Neurophysiol Clin. 2008 Dec;38(6):411-21. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2008.09.005. Epub 2008 Oct 9.

  • Yogev-Seligmann G, Hausdorff JM, Giladi N. The role of executive function and attention in gait. Mov Disord. 2008 Feb 15;23(3):329-42; quiz 472. doi: 10.1002/mds.21720.

  • Carson N, Leach L, Murphy KJ. A re-examination of Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) cutoff scores. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2018 Feb;33(2):379-388. doi: 10.1002/gps.4756. Epub 2017 Jul 21.

  • Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x.

  • Bjelland I, Dahl AA, Haug TT, Neckelmann D. The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. An updated literature review. J Psychosom Res. 2002 Feb;52(2):69-77. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3999(01)00296-3.

  • Davies RA, Luxon LM. Dizziness following head injury: a neuro-otological study. J Neurol. 1995 Mar;242(4):222-30. doi: 10.1007/BF00919595.

  • Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS). The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version). Cephalalgia. 2013 Jul;33(9):629-808. doi: 10.1177/0333102413485658. No abstract available.

  • Lempert T, Olesen J, Furman J, Waterston J, Seemungal B, Carey J, Bisdorff A, Versino M, Evers S, Newman-Toker D. Vestibular migraine: diagnostic criteria. J Vestib Res. 2012;22(4):167-72. doi: 10.3233/VES-2012-0453.

  • Neuhauser H, Leopold M, von Brevern M, Arnold G, Lempert T. The interrelations of migraine, vertigo, and migrainous vertigo. Neurology. 2001 Feb 27;56(4):436-41. doi: 10.1212/wnl.56.4.436.

  • Wrisley DM, Marchetti GF, Kuharsky DK, Whitney SL. Reliability, internal consistency, and validity of data obtained with the functional gait assessment. Phys Ther. 2004 Oct;84(10):906-18.

  • Marchetti GF, Lin CC, Alghadir A, Whitney SL. Responsiveness and minimal detectable change of the dynamic gait index and functional gait index in persons with balance and vestibular disorders. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2014 Apr;38(2):119-24. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0000000000000015.

  • Wrisley DM, Kumar NA. Functional gait assessment: concurrent, discriminative, and predictive validity in community-dwelling older adults. Phys Ther. 2010 May;90(5):761-73. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20090069. Epub 2010 Apr 1.

  • Godi M, Franchignoni F, Caligari M, Giordano A, Turcato AM, Nardone A. Comparison of reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the mini-BESTest and Berg Balance Scale in patients with balance disorders. Phys Ther. 2013 Feb;93(2):158-67. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20120171. Epub 2012 Sep 27.

  • Leddy AL, Crowner BE, Earhart GM. Utility of the Mini-BESTest, BESTest, and BESTest sections for balance assessments in individuals with Parkinson disease. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2011 Jun;35(2):90-7. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0b013e31821a620c.

  • King L, Horak F. On the mini-BESTest: scoring and the reporting of total scores. Phys Ther. 2013 Apr;93(4):571-5. doi: 10.2522/ptj.2013.93.4.571. No abstract available.

  • Cambridge-Cognition-Limited. CANTABeclipseâ„¢: Test Administration Guide Manual. 3rd ed. Cambridge 2015.

    RESULT
  • Egerhazi A, Berecz R, Bartok E, Degrell I. Automated Neuropsychological Test Battery (CANTAB) in mild cognitive impairment and in Alzheimer's disease. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2007 Apr 13;31(3):746-51. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2007.01.011. Epub 2007 Jan 16.

  • Fowler KS, Saling MM, Conway EL, Semple JM, Louis WJ. Paired associate performance in the early detection of DAT. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2002 Jan;8(1):58-71.

  • Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, Cummings JL, Chertkow H. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Apr;53(4):695-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x.

  • Bamiou DE, Iliadou VV, Zanchetta S, Spyridakou C. What Can We Learn about Auditory Processing from Adult Hearing Questionnaires? J Am Acad Audiol. 2015 Nov-Dec;26(10):824-37. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.15009.

  • British Society of Audiology. Standard pure tone audiometry. British Society of Audiology-BSA 2017.

    RESULT
  • British Society of Audiology. Standard pure tone audiometry. British Society of Audiology-BSA 2011.

    RESULT
  • Doherty A, Jackson D, Hammerla N, Plotz T, Olivier P, Granat MH, White T, van Hees VT, Trenell MI, Owen CG, Preece SJ, Gillions R, Sheard S, Peakman T, Brage S, Wareham NJ. Large Scale Population Assessment of Physical Activity Using Wrist Worn Accelerometers: The UK Biobank Study. PLoS One. 2017 Feb 1;12(2):e0169649. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169649. eCollection 2017.

  • Lee IM, Shiroma EJ. Using accelerometers to measure physical activity in large-scale epidemiological studies: issues and challenges. Br J Sports Med. 2014 Feb;48(3):197-201. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2013-093154. Epub 2013 Dec 2.

  • Clarke CL, Taylor J, Crighton LJ, Goodbrand JA, McMurdo MET, Witham MD. Validation of the AX3 triaxial accelerometer in older functionally impaired people. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2017 Jun;29(3):451-457. doi: 10.1007/s40520-016-0604-8. Epub 2016 Jul 19.

  • Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF 3rd, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989 May;28(2):193-213. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4.

  • Johns MW. A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: the Epworth sleepiness scale. Sleep. 1991 Dec;14(6):540-5. doi: 10.1093/sleep/14.6.540.

  • Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen M, Kind P, Parkin D, Bonsel G, Badia X. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1727-36. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x. Epub 2011 Apr 9.

  • Yardley L, Masson E, Verschuur C, Haacke N, Luxon L. Symptoms, anxiety and handicap in dizzy patients: development of the vertigo symptom scale. J Psychosom Res. 1992 Dec;36(8):731-41. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(92)90131-k.

  • Guerraz M, Yardley L, Bertholon P, Pollak L, Rudge P, Gresty MA, Bronstein AM. Visual vertigo: symptom assessment, spatial orientation and postural control. Brain. 2001 Aug;124(Pt 8):1646-56. doi: 10.1093/brain/124.8.1646.

  • Bisdorff A, Von Brevern M, Lempert T, Newman-Toker DE. Classification of vestibular symptoms: towards an international classification of vestibular disorders. J Vestib Res. 2009;19(1-2):1-13. doi: 10.3233/VES-2009-0343. No abstract available.

  • Jacobson GP, Newman CW. The development of the Dizziness Handicap Inventory. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1990 Apr;116(4):424-7. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1990.01870040046011.

  • Whitney SL, Wrisley DM, Brown KE, Furman JM. Is perception of handicap related to functional performance in persons with vestibular dysfunction? Otol Neurotol. 2004 Mar;25(2):139-43. doi: 10.1097/00129492-200403000-00010.

  • Skerrett TN, Moss-Morris R. Fatigue and social impairment in multiple sclerosis: the role of patients' cognitive and behavioral responses to their symptoms. J Psychosom Res. 2006 Nov;61(5):587-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2006.04.018.

  • Moss-Morris R, Weinman J, Petrie KJ et al. The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPR-Q). Psychol Health 2002; 17(1): 1-16.

    RESULT
  • Powell LE, Myers AM. The Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1995 Jan;50A(1):M28-34. doi: 10.1093/gerona/50a.1.m28.

  • Lajoie Y, Gallagher SP. Predicting falls within the elderly community: comparison of postural sway, reaction time, the Berg balance scale and the Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) scale for comparing fallers and non-fallers. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2004 Jan-Feb;38(1):11-26. doi: 10.1016/s0167-4943(03)00082-7.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Dizziness

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Sensation DisordersNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Viktoria Azoidou

    Ms

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
This RCT has a single mask (assessor blinded). The blinded outcome assessors will collect all the outcome measure data at baseline (week 0) and follow-up (week 6 and 12). The outcome assessor will be asked to record any incidences of unblinding and how this occurred. Blinded outcome assessors will all be trained by Dr Marousa Pavlou or Ms Viktoria Azoidou on how to complete all assessments for parity. During the course of the study, blinded assessors will be MSc students who will work on the project as part of their MSc thesis or other PhD students in the department.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Single Blinded Randomised Controlled Trial
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 28, 2019

First Posted

October 30, 2019

Study Start

October 24, 2019

Primary Completion

August 1, 2020

Study Completion

December 1, 2020

Last Updated

November 7, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

IPD will be processed in accordance with the General Data Protection Regulation 2016 (GDPR). All information collected will be kept strictly confidential and stored anonymously on password protected computers used only by research staff. Data will be stored securely in accordance with the Data Protection Act (1998) and the General Data Protection Regulations which came into effect on 25 May 2018. IPD will not be passed on to anyone outside of participant's medical care team. Stored, anonymised data may be used for future medical and health-related studies. IPD will be retained for 10 years after it has been collected.

Locations