Study Stopped
Lack of personnel and lack of funding for the study drug
Continuous Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion Versus Placebo for Rib Fracture Analgesia
A Prospective Comparison of Continuous Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion Versus Placebo for Rib Fracture Analgesia
1 other identifier
interventional
1
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The current cornerstone of pain control for rib fractures is oral and intravenous opioids, especially in the form of patient-controlled analgesia (IV PCA), which are are associated with multiple adverse effects including sedation, respiratory depression, cough suppression, and increased risk of delirium. In the past few decades, intravenous lidocaine infusion (IVL) has emerged as a new tool in the arsenal of multimodal analgesia. Multiple randomized clinical trials have indicated that IVL is overall well tolerated and have shown other beneficial effects such as anti-inflammatory properties. To this date, there have been no published randomized clinical trials (RCT) evaluating the effectiveness of IVL in management of traumatic rib fracture pain. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to evaluate whether IV Lidocaine infusion can provide improved pain control as demonstrated by decreased OME consumption at 24 and 48 hours compared to placebo in adult patients with acute traumatic rib fractures.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Feb 2020
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 16, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 25, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 10, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 9, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 9, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 30, 2023
CompletedNovember 30, 2023
November 1, 2023
9 months
October 16, 2019
September 26, 2023
November 7, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Cumulative Oral Morphine Milligram Equivalent (OME) Consumption at 24 Hours
MME = morphine milligram equivalent
After 24 hours of treatment
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Cumulative Oral Morphine Milligram Equivalent (OME) Consumption at 48 Hrs
After 48 hours of treatment
Pain Score
Baseline and 1, 10, 13, 16, and 17 hours post-lidocaine infusion
Incentive Spirometry Volumes
Pre-infusion baseline and 24 hours post-infusion
PIC Score
Time 0, 24 hours, 48 hour, and 72 hours.
Length of Hospital Stay
29 hours
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Placebo Comparator
PLACEBO COMPARATORParticipants will receive placebo infusion consisting of normal saline
Active Comparator
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants will receive a lidocaine infusion
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- all adult patients admitted to Stanford Health Care with two or more acute traumatic rib fractures
You may not qualify if:
- hemodynamically instability
- mechanical ventilation
- polytrauma (defined as bone or organ injury outside the thorax)
- pregnancy
- incarceration
- local anesthetic allergy or contraindications to lidocaine (Stokes-Adams syndrome, Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, or severe degrees of sinoatrial, atrioventricular, or intraventricular block)
- chronic opioid use.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Stanford Healthcare
Stanford, California, 94304, United States
Related Publications (4)
Hollmann MW, Durieux ME. Local anesthetics and the inflammatory response: a new therapeutic indication? Anesthesiology. 2000 Sep;93(3):858-75. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200009000-00038. No abstract available.
PMID: 10969322BACKGROUNDFlagel BT, Luchette FA, Reed RL, Esposito TJ, Davis KA, Santaniello JM, Gamelli RL. Half-a-dozen ribs: the breakpoint for mortality. Surgery. 2005 Oct;138(4):717-23; discussion 723-5. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2005.07.022.
PMID: 16269301BACKGROUNDGordy S, Fabricant L, Ham B, Mullins R, Mayberry J. The contribution of rib fractures to chronic pain and disability. Am J Surg. 2014 May;207(5):659-62; discussion 662-3. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.12.012. Epub 2014 Jan 31.
PMID: 24612969BACKGROUNDBattle CE, Hutchings H, Evans PA. Risk factors that predict mortality in patients with blunt chest wall trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Injury. 2012 Jan;43(1):8-17. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.01.004. Epub 2011 Jan 22.
PMID: 21256488BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
This study did not meet its planned enrollment size and did not achieve statistical significance as prespecified in the study protocol.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Chi-Ho Ban Tsui
- Organization
- Stanford University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 16, 2019
First Posted
October 25, 2019
Study Start
February 10, 2020
Primary Completion
November 9, 2020
Study Completion
November 9, 2020
Last Updated
November 30, 2023
Results First Posted
November 30, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-11