Investigating Compassion-Based Guided Self-Help for Depression in People With Skin Conditions
An Acceptability and Feasibility Study of a Compassion-Based Guided Self-Help Intervention for Depression in People With Skin Conditions.
1 other identifier
interventional
34
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The study aims to explore whether an online compassion-based guided self-help intervention is perceived as acceptable to people with heterogeneous skin conditions, in terms of retention rates and explicit feedback. The study also aims to investigate the feasibility of providing online compassion-based self-help and email guidance. Changes in depression, self-compassion and skin-related distress will be assessed to give an estimate of likely effect sizes for future research
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 17, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 21, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 12, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 23, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 2, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 26, 2021
CompletedOctober 26, 2021
October 1, 2019
4 months
October 17, 2019
August 19, 2021
September 27, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
Acceptability of Intervention Overall
Percentage of participants that log in to the online intervention during their sixth week (i.e. participant retention).
Week 6 for each participant (rolling recruitment).
Acceptability of Session 1
Likert scale ratings for acceptability components (ease of use, helpfulness of information, ease of understanding, adequacy of information, and visual appeal) for each weekly session. These items have been adapted from the Website Evaluation Questionnaire as no suitable validated measure could be found. Scale mean scores range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating higher perceived acceptability.
Day 1
Acceptability of Session 2
Likert scale ratings for acceptability components (ease of use, helpfulness of information, ease of understanding, adequacy of information, and visual appeal) for each weekly session. These items have been adapted from the Website Evaluation Questionnaire as no suitable validated measure could be found. Scale mean scores range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating higher perceived acceptability.
Day 8
Acceptability of Session 3
Likert scale ratings for acceptability components (ease of use, helpfulness of information, ease of understanding, adequacy of information, and visual appeal) for each weekly session. These items have been adapted from the Website Evaluation Questionnaire as no suitable validated measure could be found. Scale mean scores range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating higher perceived acceptability.
Day 15
Acceptability of Session 4
Likert scale ratings for acceptability components (ease of use, helpfulness of information, ease of understanding, adequacy of information, and visual appeal) for each weekly session. These items have been adapted from the Website Evaluation Questionnaire as no suitable validated measure could be found. Scale mean scores range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating higher perceived acceptability.
Day 22
Acceptability of Session 5
Likert scale ratings for acceptability components (ease of use, helpfulness of information, ease of understanding, adequacy of information, and visual appeal) for each weekly session. These items have been adapted from the Website Evaluation Questionnaire as no suitable validated measure could be found. Scale mean scores range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating higher perceived acceptability.
Day 29
Acceptability of Session 6
Likert scale ratings for acceptability components (ease of use, helpfulness of information, ease of understanding, adequacy of information, and visual appeal) for each weekly session. These items have been adapted from the Website Evaluation Questionnaire as no suitable validated measure could be found. Scale mean scores range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating higher perceived acceptability.
Day 36
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Change From Baseline Depression Subscale of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-DEP) Score After Six Weeks.
Days 1 and 43.
Change From Baseline Self-Compassion Scale (SCS) Score After Six Weeks.
Days 1 and 43.
Change From Baseline Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score After Six Weeks.
Days 1 and 43.
Study Arms (1)
Compassion guided self-help
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will engage in a six-week online compassion-based self-help programme with email guidance from the researcher.
Interventions
Online guided self-help intervention derived from Compassion Focused Therapy (Gilbert, 2010).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- self-report of currently having a skin condition that has been present for at least the last six months and has been diagnosed by a medical professional.
- scored 10-20 (inclusive) on DASS-DEP (depression subscale of Depression Anxiety Stress Scales).
You may not qualify if:
- currently receiving a psychological therapy for a mental health problem.
- current diagnosis of a serious mental illness (e.g. psychosis or bipolar disorder).
- current diagnosis of a drug or alcohol problem.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The University of Sheffield
Sheffield, South Yorkshire, S1 2LT, United Kingdom
Related Publications (6)
Kelly AC, Zuroff DC, Shapira LB. Soothing oneself and resisting self-attacks: The treatment of two intrapersonal deficits in depression vulnerability. Cognitive Therapy and Research 33: 301-313, 2009.
BACKGROUNDShapira LB, Mongrain M. The benefits of self-compassion and optimism exercises for individuals vulnerable to depression. The Journal of Positive Psychology 5: 337-389, 2010.
BACKGROUNDMcEwan K, Gilbert P. A pilot feasibility study exploring the practising of compassionate imagery exercises in a nonclinical population. Psychol Psychother. 2016 Jun;89(2):239-43. doi: 10.1111/papt.12078. Epub 2015 Oct 10.
PMID: 26454144BACKGROUNDGilbert P, Irons C. Focused therapies and compassionate mind training for shame and self-attacking. In: Gilbert P, editor. Compassion: Conceptualisations, Research and Use in Psychotherapy. Hove: Routledge; 2005. p 263-325.
BACKGROUNDGilbert P. Compassion Focused Therapy: The CBT distinctive features series. Hove: Routledge; 2010. 237 p.
BACKGROUNDClarke EN, Norman P, Thompson AR. Online compassion-based self-help for depression in people with skin conditions: a feasibility study. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2024 Apr 16;10(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s40814-024-01486-4.
PMID: 38627850DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Elaine Clarke
- Organization
- The University of Sheffield
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Elaine N Clarke, PhD
University of Sheffield
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 17, 2019
First Posted
October 21, 2019
Study Start
November 12, 2019
Primary Completion
March 23, 2020
Study Completion
April 2, 2020
Last Updated
October 26, 2021
Results First Posted
October 26, 2021
Record last verified: 2019-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual patient data will not be made available to maintain confidentiality, but aggregated data may be made available from the lead researcher upon reasonable request.