NCT04132973

Brief Summary

The study aims to explore whether an online compassion-based guided self-help intervention is perceived as acceptable to people with heterogeneous skin conditions, in terms of retention rates and explicit feedback. The study also aims to investigate the feasibility of providing online compassion-based self-help and email guidance. Changes in depression, self-compassion and skin-related distress will be assessed to give an estimate of likely effect sizes for future research

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
34

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2019

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 17, 2019

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 21, 2019

Completed
22 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 12, 2019

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 23, 2020

Completed
10 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 2, 2020

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

October 26, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

October 26, 2021

Status Verified

October 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

October 17, 2019

Results QC Date

August 19, 2021

Last Update Submit

September 27, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

acceptabilityfeasibilityself-management

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (7)

  • Acceptability of Intervention Overall

    Percentage of participants that log in to the online intervention during their sixth week (i.e. participant retention).

    Week 6 for each participant (rolling recruitment).

  • Acceptability of Session 1

    Likert scale ratings for acceptability components (ease of use, helpfulness of information, ease of understanding, adequacy of information, and visual appeal) for each weekly session. These items have been adapted from the Website Evaluation Questionnaire as no suitable validated measure could be found. Scale mean scores range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating higher perceived acceptability.

    Day 1

  • Acceptability of Session 2

    Likert scale ratings for acceptability components (ease of use, helpfulness of information, ease of understanding, adequacy of information, and visual appeal) for each weekly session. These items have been adapted from the Website Evaluation Questionnaire as no suitable validated measure could be found. Scale mean scores range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating higher perceived acceptability.

    Day 8

  • Acceptability of Session 3

    Likert scale ratings for acceptability components (ease of use, helpfulness of information, ease of understanding, adequacy of information, and visual appeal) for each weekly session. These items have been adapted from the Website Evaluation Questionnaire as no suitable validated measure could be found. Scale mean scores range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating higher perceived acceptability.

    Day 15

  • Acceptability of Session 4

    Likert scale ratings for acceptability components (ease of use, helpfulness of information, ease of understanding, adequacy of information, and visual appeal) for each weekly session. These items have been adapted from the Website Evaluation Questionnaire as no suitable validated measure could be found. Scale mean scores range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating higher perceived acceptability.

    Day 22

  • Acceptability of Session 5

    Likert scale ratings for acceptability components (ease of use, helpfulness of information, ease of understanding, adequacy of information, and visual appeal) for each weekly session. These items have been adapted from the Website Evaluation Questionnaire as no suitable validated measure could be found. Scale mean scores range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating higher perceived acceptability.

    Day 29

  • Acceptability of Session 6

    Likert scale ratings for acceptability components (ease of use, helpfulness of information, ease of understanding, adequacy of information, and visual appeal) for each weekly session. These items have been adapted from the Website Evaluation Questionnaire as no suitable validated measure could be found. Scale mean scores range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating higher perceived acceptability.

    Day 36

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Change From Baseline Depression Subscale of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-DEP) Score After Six Weeks.

    Days 1 and 43.

  • Change From Baseline Self-Compassion Scale (SCS) Score After Six Weeks.

    Days 1 and 43.

  • Change From Baseline Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score After Six Weeks.

    Days 1 and 43.

Study Arms (1)

Compassion guided self-help

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will engage in a six-week online compassion-based self-help programme with email guidance from the researcher.

Behavioral: Compassion for Skin Conditions

Interventions

Online guided self-help intervention derived from Compassion Focused Therapy (Gilbert, 2010).

Compassion guided self-help

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • self-report of currently having a skin condition that has been present for at least the last six months and has been diagnosed by a medical professional.
  • scored 10-20 (inclusive) on DASS-DEP (depression subscale of Depression Anxiety Stress Scales).

You may not qualify if:

  • currently receiving a psychological therapy for a mental health problem.
  • current diagnosis of a serious mental illness (e.g. psychosis or bipolar disorder).
  • current diagnosis of a drug or alcohol problem.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

The University of Sheffield

Sheffield, South Yorkshire, S1 2LT, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Kelly AC, Zuroff DC, Shapira LB. Soothing oneself and resisting self-attacks: The treatment of two intrapersonal deficits in depression vulnerability. Cognitive Therapy and Research 33: 301-313, 2009.

    BACKGROUND
  • Shapira LB, Mongrain M. The benefits of self-compassion and optimism exercises for individuals vulnerable to depression. The Journal of Positive Psychology 5: 337-389, 2010.

    BACKGROUND
  • McEwan K, Gilbert P. A pilot feasibility study exploring the practising of compassionate imagery exercises in a nonclinical population. Psychol Psychother. 2016 Jun;89(2):239-43. doi: 10.1111/papt.12078. Epub 2015 Oct 10.

    PMID: 26454144BACKGROUND
  • Gilbert P, Irons C. Focused therapies and compassionate mind training for shame and self-attacking. In: Gilbert P, editor. Compassion: Conceptualisations, Research and Use in Psychotherapy. Hove: Routledge; 2005. p 263-325.

    BACKGROUND
  • Gilbert P. Compassion Focused Therapy: The CBT distinctive features series. Hove: Routledge; 2010. 237 p.

    BACKGROUND
  • Clarke EN, Norman P, Thompson AR. Online compassion-based self-help for depression in people with skin conditions: a feasibility study. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2024 Apr 16;10(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s40814-024-01486-4.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Skin DiseasesDepression

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Skin and Connective Tissue DiseasesBehavioral SymptomsBehavior

Results Point of Contact

Title
Elaine Clarke
Organization
The University of Sheffield

Study Officials

  • Elaine N Clarke, PhD

    University of Sheffield

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: This is an acceptability and feasibility study of a novel healthcare intervention, therefore there is only one study group.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 17, 2019

First Posted

October 21, 2019

Study Start

November 12, 2019

Primary Completion

March 23, 2020

Study Completion

April 2, 2020

Last Updated

October 26, 2021

Results First Posted

October 26, 2021

Record last verified: 2019-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Individual patient data will not be made available to maintain confidentiality, but aggregated data may be made available from the lead researcher upon reasonable request.

Locations