Social Connectedness Group Intervention in Depression
G4H-A
Feasibility Study of the Groups for Health Intervention for Adults Accessing Treatment for Depression
1 other identifier
interventional
29
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study evaluates the feasibility of the Groups for Health (G4H) intervention for adults accessing support for depression in the UK. G4H targets improvements in adults' interpersonal functioning in order to reduce feelings of loneliness. The study will adapt the G4H intervention for delivery to adults seeking treatment for depression in the UK and estimate trial parameters (recruitment, retention, missing data and acceptability) of the adapted intervention, prior to a definitive trial. A mixed methods design of interviews and a single group, pre-post study will be employed.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable depression
Started Oct 2018
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable depression
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 14, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 27, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 18, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 18, 2019
CompletedApril 26, 2019
April 1, 2019
6 months
February 14, 2018
April 24, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Feasibility of recruitment
The proportion of patients contacted for screening against those who are consented
3 months
Feasibility of enrollment
The proportion of patients consented against those enrolled
3 months
Feasibility of data collection
The overall proportion of survey measures completed by each participant at each of the 2 time points
8 weeks
Patient retention
The proportion of patients attending all five G4H sessions
8 weeks
Study Arms (1)
Single arm: Groups 4 Health
EXPERIMENTALSocial group intervention. The aim is to practice participating in a social group within a safe environment; to identify groups and social networks which are meaningful for the person; and to understand any barriers people may have to engaging with these groups/networks.
Interventions
Group sessions, 5 modules x 1.5 hours (once per week). Modules focus on psychoeducation, mapping existing social networks, examining barriers to engagement in existing networks, goal setting and identifying new groups to join.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Phase 1
- Service user participants:
- Aged 18-65
- Accessing treatment for depression
- Loneliness: score 6 or above on the University of California Loneliness Scale (UCLA-3) (Hughes et al., 2004)
- Able to speak/read English
- Ability to give informed consent
- Staff participants:
- \- Clinical practitioner with at least 6 months experience of working with people with depression
- Phase 2 Activity 1: intervention
- Aged 18-65
- Accessing treatment for depression
- Loneliness: score 6 or above on the University of California Loneliness Scale (UCLA-3) (Hughes et al., 2004)
- Able to speak/read English
- Ability to give informed consent
- +2 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- None
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG3 6AA, United Kingdom
Related Publications (5)
Baker SL, Heinrichs N, Kim HJ, Hofmann SG. The liebowitz social anxiety scale as a self-report instrument: a preliminary psychometric analysis. Behav Res Ther. 2002 Jun;40(6):701-15. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7967(01)00060-2.
PMID: 12051488BACKGROUNDHays RD, DiMatteo MR. A short-form measure of loneliness. J Pers Assess. 1987 Spring;51(1):69-81. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5101_6.
PMID: 3572711BACKGROUNDHughes ME, Waite LJ, Hawkley LC, Cacioppo JT. A Short Scale for Measuring Loneliness in Large Surveys: Results From Two Population-Based Studies. Res Aging. 2004;26(6):655-672. doi: 10.1177/0164027504268574.
PMID: 18504506BACKGROUNDKroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x.
PMID: 11556941BACKGROUNDVan Orden KA, Cukrowicz KC, Witte TK, Joiner TE. Thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness: construct validity and psychometric properties of the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire. Psychol Assess. 2012 Mar;24(1):197-215. doi: 10.1037/a0025358. Epub 2011 Sep 19.
PMID: 21928908BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Tom Dening, MD
University of Nottingham
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 14, 2018
First Posted
February 27, 2018
Study Start
October 1, 2018
Primary Completion
March 18, 2019
Study Completion
March 18, 2019
Last Updated
April 26, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-04