Effectiveness and Implementation of the Assessment of Burden of Chronic Conditions (ABCC)-Tool
Effectiveness, Cost-effectiveness and Implementation of the Assessment of Burden of Chronic Conditions (ABCC)-Tool in Patients With COPD, Asthma, Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 and Heart Failure: a Pragmatic Clustered Quasi-experimental Study
1 other identifier
interventional
237
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study is designed to evaluate the effectiveness and implementation of the Assessment of Burden of Chronic Conditions (ABCC)-tool for patients with COPD, asthma, diabetes mellitus type 2 or heart failure (and any combination of these conditions) in real-life routine practice. The ABCC-tool consists of a questionnaire, a visualisation using balloons that is based on cut-off points, and treatment advice. The ABCC-tool is intended to be used in daily healthcare practice, is designed to monitor a patient's integrated health status over time, to facilitate shared decision making, and to stimulate self-management. The study has a pragmatic clustered quasi-experimental design with two arms. The intervention group will use the ABCC-tool and the control group will receive usual care. The study will be implemented at a general practice-level, and has a follow-up period of 18 months. The primary outcome is change in perceived quality of care, as measured with the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC), as compared to usual care after 18 months. It is hypothesized that the change in perceived quality of care is significantly higher in the group using the ABCC-tool as compared to the group that receives usual care. Additionally the implementation of the ABCC-tool in general practices will be evaluated in 12 general practices. The implementation study will evaluate the context of caregivers with the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, the process of implementation with the RE-AIM framework, and fidelity to the intervention with the fidelity framework.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable chronic-obstructive-pulmonary-disease
Started Nov 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable chronic-obstructive-pulmonary-disease
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 10, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 15, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2022
CompletedMarch 16, 2023
March 1, 2023
3 years
October 10, 2019
March 14, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Perceived quality of care (PACIC): Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care
Measured with the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care, for total group. The scale has 20 items. Answers range from 1 to 5. Average scores (range 1-5) will be calculated. Higher scores mean more frequent presence of the aspect of structured chronic care.
0 months (baseline), 18 months
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Perceived quality of care (PACIC): Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care
0 months (baseline), 6 months, 12 months
Perceived quality of care (PACIC): Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care
0 months (baseline), 18 months
Quality of life (EQ-5D-5L)
0 months (baseline), 6 months, 12 months, 18 months
Capability well-being (ICECAP-A)
0 months (baseline), 6 months, 12 months, 18 months
Patients' activation (PAM)
0 months (baseline), 6 months, 12 months, 18 months
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
ABCC-tool
EXPERIMENTALThe intervention group will use the ABCC-tool during consultation with their healthcare provider. Healthcare providers in the intervention group will receive a short instructional film about the ABCC-tool before the start of the study. Additionally, healthcare providers from 12 practices will be invited for interviews, evaluating the context and process of implementation.
Usual care
NO INTERVENTIONThe control group will receive usual care, and healthcare providers will not be instructed
Interventions
The tool consists of a questionnaire, a visualisation using balloons, and treatment advice. A patient completes the questionnaire before consultation. The questionnaire measures the experienced burden of the chronic condition(s), and several risk factors. The questionnaire consists of a generic part and disease-specific parts. The generic questionnaire will be combined with any amount of disease-specific questionnaires (i.e. COPD, asthma, diabetes type 2 and heart failure), to form a single personalised scale and balloon chart for each individual patient. Outcomes of the questionnaire are visualised using balloons. The healthcare provider opens the visualisation during consultation. A balloon represents a domain, and the colour and height indicate a score on that domain. If a patient and healthcare provider select a balloon by clicking on it, treatment advice is shown by means of pop-ups. Based on the discussion following treatment advice, personal care plans can be determined.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- diagnosis COPD, asthma, Diabetes Mellitus type 2 and/or heart failure
- can understand and read the Dutch language
You may not qualify if:
- COPD or asthma: used prednisone due to an exacerbation less than six weeks ago
- Heart failure or diabetes mellitus type 2: hospitalized less than six weeks ago
- Healthcare providers or patients who have already used the Assessment of Burden of COPD-tool are excluded from the control group
- Patients who have already used the Assessment of Burden of COPD-tool will be excluded from the intervention group
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Maastricht Universitylead
- Netherlands Instititute for Health Services Researchcollaborator
- TNOcollaborator
- University of Twentecollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Maastricht University
Maastricht, Limburg, 6200MD, Netherlands
Related Publications (3)
Peters LH, Joore MA, Gidding-Slok AH, Keijsers LC, Twellaar M, Boudewijns EA, van Schayck OC, Muris JW, Kimman ML. Cost-effectiveness analysis of the Assessment of Burden of Chronic Conditions (ABCC) tool in primary care in the Netherlands. BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 24;15(6):e099762. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099762.
PMID: 40555443DERIVEDBoudewijns EA, Claessens D, van Schayck OCP, Twellaar M, Winkens B, Joore MA, Keijsers LCEM, Krol S, Urlings M, Gidding-Slok AHM. Effectiveness of the Assessment of Burden of Chronic Conditions (ABCC)-tool in patients with asthma, COPD, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and heart failure: A pragmatic clustered quasi-experimental study in the Netherlands. Eur J Gen Pract. 2024 Dec;30(1):2343364. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2024.2343364. Epub 2024 May 13.
PMID: 38738695DERIVEDBoudewijns EA, Claessens D, Joore M, Keijsers LCEM, van Schayck OCP, Winkens B, Gidding-Slok AHM. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the Assessment of Burden of Chronic Conditions (ABCC) tool in patients with COPD, asthma, diabetes mellitus type 2 and heart failure: protocol for a pragmatic clustered quasi-experimental study. BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 17;10(11):e037693. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037693.
PMID: 33203626DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Onno CP van Schayck, Prof.
Maastricht University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Blinding of healthcare providers and patients is not possible due to the nature of the intervention, but the study team will be blind to treatment arms in the data set during data cleaning, handling of missing data, statistical analyses and drawing of conclusions.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 10, 2019
First Posted
October 15, 2019
Study Start
November 1, 2019
Primary Completion
November 1, 2022
Study Completion
November 1, 2022
Last Updated
March 16, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
Deidentified individual data can be shared with researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal.