Stress-physiology Coherence, Interoception, and Well-being Following Mindfulness Training or Tracking Time Spent on Mobile Device
SCIM
Is Knowing the Body Knowing the Mind? Stress-physiology Coherence, Interoception, and Mindfulness
4 other identifiers
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Chronic stress has been shown to impact long-term emotional and physical health. When nearly three-quarters of Americans report stress at levels that exceed what they consider healthy, there is a desperate need to understand factors that contribute to effective stress regulation. This work seeks to develop a measure tied to awareness and acceptance of stress that has shown promise as a predictor of multiple markers of mental and physical well-being, understand how it relates to awareness of the body, and explore whether it can be trained to alleviate suffering and promote well-being. This study aims to 1) Conceptually replicate and extend previous findings linking greater stress-physiology coherence to higher well-being. 2) Assess whether awareness of physiology is associated with stress-physiology coherence. 3) Explore whether stress-physiology coherence can be trained through a brief mindfulness training intervention.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2020
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 5, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 14, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 21, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 30, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 30, 2022
CompletedDecember 21, 2022
December 1, 2022
2.9 years
September 5, 2019
December 20, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in subjective stress-heart rate coherence
Within-participant association between repeated measures of subjective stress (1-100 Visual Analog Scale rating) and heart rate over the course of a stress-induction paradigm. Stronger positive associations indicate higher stress-heart rate coherence.
Baseline and post-test, separated by 4 weeks
Other Outcomes (18)
Mean Change in Accuracy on Method of Constant Stimuli (MCS) Interoceptive Accuracy Task
Baseline and post-test, separated by 4 weeks
Mean Change in Interoceptive Sensibility measured as the total score on the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness Version 2 (MAIA-2)
Baseline and post-test, separated by 4 weeks
Mean Change in Meta-Awareness Measured on a Method of Constant Stimuli Light-Tone Task
Baseline and post-test, separated by 4 weeks
- +15 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Mindfulness training
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will listen to one to two 3-30 minute audio recordings each day for 4 weeks between study visits (28 days total) through the Healthy Minds @Work smartphone app and record when they listen to each recording on a paper log. The app will also collect data on which recordings, when, and for how long participants listen.
Tracking time spent on mobile device
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants will record how much time they estimate they have spent on their phone in the past 24 hours, each day for 4 weeks (28 days total) between study visits.
Interventions
Brief audio recordings discussing mindfulness or guided mindfulness practices.
Participants will record each day how much time they estimate they spent on their smart phone in the past 24 hours.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18 to 65;
- Comfortable reading, writing, and conversing in English
- U.S. Citizen or permanent resident (for payment purposes)
- Have a smartphone compatible with our study app
You may not qualify if:
- Significant past experience with meditation, yoga, tai chi, or qi gong;
- Current or past psychotic disorder, Bipolar Disorder, PTSD, or social phobia;
- Current, severe major depressive episode;
- Current, severe generalized anxiety;
- Active prescription stimulant use (current or in the past month);
- Active prescription beta-blocker, beta-agonist, anti-high blood pressure, or anti-anxiety medication use (current or in the past month);
- Currently pregnant (due to physiological changes);
- History of neurological disorder;
- Currently diagnosed with high blood pressure, or heart murmur;
- Have a pacemaker
- Have participated in the Trier Social Stress Test previously
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Wisconsin - Madison
Madison, Wisconsin, 53703, United States
Related Publications (28)
Birkett MA. The Trier Social Stress Test protocol for inducing psychological stress. J Vis Exp. 2011 Oct 19;(56):3238. doi: 10.3791/3238.
PMID: 22042290BACKGROUNDEkman, P. (1992). An argument for basic emotions. Cognition & emotion, 6(3-4), 169-200.
BACKGROUNDMauss IB, Levenson RW, McCarter L, Wilhelm FH, Gross JJ. The tie that binds? Coherence among emotion experience, behavior, and physiology. Emotion. 2005 Jun;5(2):175-90. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.5.2.175.
PMID: 15982083BACKGROUNDCampbell J, Ehlert U. Acute psychosocial stress: does the emotional stress response correspond with physiological responses? Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2012 Aug;37(8):1111-34. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2011.12.010. Epub 2012 Jan 18.
PMID: 22260938BACKGROUNDCarver CS, Scheier MF, Weintraub JK. Assessing coping strategies: a theoretically based approach. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989 Feb;56(2):267-83. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.56.2.267.
PMID: 2926629BACKGROUNDDarwin, C. (2009). The expression of the emotions in man and animals (P. Ekman, Ed.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1872)
BACKGROUNDGarfinkel SN, Manassei MF, Hamilton-Fletcher G, In den Bosch Y, Critchley HD, Engels M. Interoceptive dimensions across cardiac and respiratory axes. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016 Nov 19;371(1708):20160014. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0014. Epub 2016 Oct 10.
PMID: 28080971BACKGROUNDHirshberg MJ, Goldberg SB, Schaefer SM, Flook L, Findley D, Davidson RJ. Divergent effects of brief contemplative practices in response to an acute stressor: A randomized controlled trial of brief breath awareness, loving-kindness, gratitude or an attention control practice. PLoS One. 2018 Dec 12;13(12):e0207765. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207765. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 30540772BACKGROUNDLang, P. J. (1988). What are the data of emotion? In V. Hamilton, G. H. Bower, & N. Frijda (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on emotion and motivation (pp. 173-191). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
BACKGROUNDLazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
BACKGROUNDLevenson, R. W. (1994). Human emotion: A functional view. In P. Ekman & R. J. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions (pp. 123-126). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
BACKGROUNDPlutchik, R. (1980). Emotion: A psychoevolutionary synthesis. New York, NY: HarperCollins College Division.
BACKGROUNDRadloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychology Measurement, 1, 385-401.
BACKGROUNDRyff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069-1081.
BACKGROUNDSommerfeldt SL, Schaefer SM, Brauer M, Ryff CD, Davidson RJ. Individual Differences in the Association Between Subjective Stress and Heart Rate Are Related to Psychological and Physical Well-Being. Psychol Sci. 2019 Jul;30(7):1016-1029. doi: 10.1177/0956797619849555. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
PMID: 31188735BACKGROUNDSpielberger, C. D. (1983). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Form Y) ("Self-Evaluation Questionnaire"). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
BACKGROUNDSze JA, Gyurak A, Yuan JW, Levenson RW. Coherence between emotional experience and physiology: does body awareness training have an impact? Emotion. 2010 Dec;10(6):803-14. doi: 10.1037/a0020146.
PMID: 21058842BACKGROUNDBrener J, Ring C, Liu X. Effects of data limitations on heartbeat detection in the method of constant stimuli. Psychophysiology. 1994 May;31(3):309-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1994.tb02219.x.
PMID: 8008794BACKGROUNDBrener J, Liu X, Ring C. A method of constant stimuli for examining heartbeat detection: comparison with the Brener-Kluvitse and Whitehead methods. Psychophysiology. 1993 Nov;30(6):657-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1993.tb02091.x.
PMID: 8248457BACKGROUNDBaer RA, Smith GT, Lykins E, Button D, Krietemeyer J, Sauer S, Walsh E, Duggan D, Williams JM. Construct validity of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire in meditating and nonmeditating samples. Assessment. 2008 Sep;15(3):329-42. doi: 10.1177/1073191107313003. Epub 2008 Feb 29.
PMID: 18310597BACKGROUNDLevenson H. Multidimensional locus of control in psychiatric patients. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1973 Dec;41(3):397-404. doi: 10.1037/h0035357. No abstract available.
PMID: 4803272BACKGROUNDCohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983 Dec;24(4):385-96. No abstract available.
PMID: 6668417BACKGROUNDGillanders DT, Bolderston H, Bond FW, Dempster M, Flaxman PE, Campbell L, Kerr S, Tansey L, Noel P, Ferenbach C, Masley S, Roach L, Lloyd J, May L, Clarke S, Remington B. The development and initial validation of the cognitive fusion questionnaire. Behav Ther. 2014 Jan;45(1):83-101. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2013.09.001. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
PMID: 24411117BACKGROUNDBuysse DJ, Reynolds CF 3rd, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989 May;28(2):193-213. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4.
PMID: 2748771BACKGROUNDMehling WE, Acree M, Stewart A, Silas J, Jones A. The Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness, Version 2 (MAIA-2). PLoS One. 2018 Dec 4;13(12):e0208034. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208034. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 30513087BACKGROUNDBagby RM, Parker JD, Taylor GJ. The twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale--I. Item selection and cross-validation of the factor structure. J Psychosom Res. 1994 Jan;38(1):23-32. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(94)90005-1.
PMID: 8126686BACKGROUNDKesebir P, Gasiorowska A, Goldman R, Hirshberg MJ, Davidson RJ. Emotional Style Questionnaire: A multidimensional measure of healthy emotionality. Psychol Assess. 2019 Oct;31(10):1234-1246. doi: 10.1037/pas0000745. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
PMID: 31259572BACKGROUNDGamez W, Chmielewski M, Kotov R, Ruggero C, Suzuki N, Watson D. The brief experiential avoidance questionnaire: development and initial validation. Psychol Assess. 2014 Mar;26(1):35-45. doi: 10.1037/a0034473. Epub 2013 Sep 23.
PMID: 24059474BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sasha Sommerfeldt, M.S.
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Researchers involved in participant testing will not know the participant's group. Researchers conducting data analysis will not know data codes assigned to groups.
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 5, 2019
First Posted
October 14, 2019
Study Start
January 21, 2020
Primary Completion
November 30, 2022
Study Completion
November 30, 2022
Last Updated
December 21, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Data will become available after Sasha Sommerfeldt's dissertation defense. The study protocol, analysis plan, informed consent form, and analytic code will be shared publicly through the open science framework upon acceptance of a manuscript detailing findings for the main aims of the study. Data will be shared upon request from qualified researchers.
Coded data only may be banked for future use to address research questions not included in this registration. We may share coded data with other researchers within and outside of UW-Madison, and data may also be used in additional future approved research studies. These studies may include analysis of the information from this study alone or in combination with data collected in other studies. All data except Protected Health Information may be shared. Data may be shared as Supplemental Information uploaded to a journal website and/or shared on a UW data sharing website. Data sharing would not require any further participation from participants. Participants may withdraw their data from future research by submitting a request in writing to our study team.