Monitoring and Evaluation of Posture in Office Workstations With Artificial Intelligence
Posture Sensing Method Validation at the Office Workstation
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Office workers spend 11.6 hours per day in sedentary activities during the day, leading to increased health risks. Although there is literature on prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders and work station modification for office workers, successful implementation and follow-through of evidence-based recommendations in office environments is extremely challenging. This study aims to validate various techniques for evaluating posture, particularly in the neck, shoulder, and trunk, in order to develop evidence-based feedback for the office desk user. This study will include up to 40 volunteers over the age of 18 who regularly work on computer-based tasks at a desk. Participants will be observed working in a provided work station in a variety of different working postures. Data are collected using electromyography sensors, Kinect camera, and at least two video recording cameras to obtain postural information. Measurement of joint positioning and posture will be completed using an ergonomic screening tool from images collected throughout the testing. Participants will provide information on their level of comfort throughout various body regions in response to working in various positions. This will be an iterative study with multiple positions used to test the positioning of sensors, and the development of suitable algorithms to evaluate posture. The collected data will be used to inform sensing methods for office work posture.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started May 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 8, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 10, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 25, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 15, 2020
CompletedNovember 3, 2020
November 1, 2020
6 months
October 8, 2019
November 2, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Pain on the Visual Analog Pain Scale from baseline
A Visual Analog Pain Scale is a ten-centimeter long line in which participants are asked to place a mark from a minimum of 0 (no pain) to a maximum of 10 (worst pain imaginable). Participants respond to pain, discomfort, or other sensations (i.e. numbness) in their R/L Hand/Wrist, R/L Forearm/Elbow, R/L Shoulder, Neck, Upper Back, Lower Back, R/L Hip/Leg, R/L Foot.
Baseline, every 10 minutes the first hour, every 15 minutes the second hour
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Posture on the Rapid Upper Limb Assessment
Every ten minutes the first hour, average across the second hour
Study Arms (1)
Posture Sequence
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will complete computer work on a provided monitor and keyboard for two hours. During the first hour, the research personnel will alter the workstation every ten minutes to test various different postures of the neck, shoulder, arms, and trunk. The sequence will include 3 seated postures and 3 standing postures. At the end of the first hour, the participant will be instructed to adjust the workstation independently and continue to work for 60 minutes for an observational session.
Interventions
Participants are asked to work in a sequence of workstation setups for ten minutes each. The sequence include 1. sitting with workstation adjusted by the participant, 2. sitting with workstation adjusted to promote proper posture, 3. sitting with workstation adjusted to promote unnatural posture, 4. standing with workstation adjusted by the participant, 5. standing with workstation adjusted to promote proper posture, and 6. standing with workstation adjusted to promote unnatural posture. After the sequence of setups, the participant allowed to adjust the workstation in either sitting/standing to work in 60 minutes in their own desired position.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years old or older
- Ability to read, speak, and converse in English
You may not qualify if:
- Severe limitations in range of motion through the upper extremity, trunk or neck
- Significant musculoskeletal disorders (e.g., low back pain, carpal tunnel syndrome, cervical radiculopathy)
- Neurological conditions that affect sensation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Southern California
Los Angeles, California, 90089, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Shawn C Roll, PhD
University of Southern California
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 8, 2019
First Posted
October 10, 2019
Study Start
May 1, 2019
Primary Completion
October 25, 2019
Study Completion
January 15, 2020
Last Updated
November 3, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share