NCT04120545

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect on the overactive bladder in women using a care protocol plus the application of microcurrent patches during 1 hours per session compared to the effect of the same protocol plus placebo electric stimulation.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
56

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2019

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 6, 2019

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 9, 2019

Completed
26 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 4, 2019

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 4, 2021

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 4, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

December 14, 2021

Status Verified

December 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

October 6, 2019

Last Update Submit

December 10, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

physical therapy modalityElectric Stimulation TherapyUrologic DiseasesPelvic Floor Disorders

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Urinary Incontinence

    The reduction of at least 25% urination will be considered successful. This result is measured objectively from the voiding diary.

    Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Urinary Incontinence II

    Between the first and the fourth week of intervention.

  • Urinary Incontinence III

    Between the fourth and the eighth week of intervention.

  • Nocturia

    Average number of nocturia episodes measured in a diary of 3 days before each visit.

  • Bladder Control Self-Assessment Hyperactive

    After 5 weeks of intervention.

  • International Consultation on Incontinence questionnaire

    It will be completed at the beginning of the study, at week 4 and at 8 of the treatment

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Blinding effectiveness evaluation

    At 2 weeks after the start of the intervention

Study Arms (2)

Microcurrents

EXPERIMENTAL

Intervention with microcurrents: application of 6 electrodes per extremity and an adhesive electrode at C7, L3 or S1 level depending on the session number.

Device: Microcurrents

Placebo microcurrents

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Intervention with microcurrents: application of 6 electrodes per extremity and an adhesive electrode at C7, L3 or S1 level depending on the session number.

Device: Placebo Microcurrents

Interventions

The electrodes will be placed with the help of gloves and adapted socks for 1 hour, twice a week, until 10 intervention sessions are completed. In addition, depending on the session, an adhesive electrode will be placed at the level of C7, L3 or S1. Characteristics of microcurrents: pulsed monophasic rectangular wave with a pulse of 1.3 s and pause of 300 ms, voltage 3 mV and intensity 0.5 μA.

Microcurrents

The same protocol described for the experimental group will be applied, but microcurrents device which will be previously manipulated and tested with an oscilloscope so that they do not emit electrical currents

Placebo microcurrents

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale(Gender-based eligibility)
Gender Eligibility DetailsMen will be excluded to avoid the potential influence of prostate problems, the main causes of the symptoms described.
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Women, over 18 years of age and with urinary incontinence (3 or more times per week) or overactive bladder (8 or more emptied per day, and / or 2 or more at night) who have received, or not, active / alternative treatment for this pathology.
  • Under competent cognitive conditions to participate in the study and trained to complete the study questionnaires.
  • Without contraindications for a treatment with microcurrents: Pacemakers, pregnant women, internal bleeding, do not apply electrodes on skin in poor condition, with ulcerations or wounds, acute febrile processes, acute thrombophlebitis and / or electricity phobia.

You may not qualify if:

  • People with lifestyle habits (diet, amount of fluid ingested) extreme or singular (eg person who consumes 5 liters of water a day).
  • Presence of urinary fistula.
  • Men. Men will be excluded to avoid the potential influence of prostate problems, the main causes of the symptoms described.
  • Urinary tract infection, or relapses: 5 or more infections in the last 12 months.
  • Participants with bladder stones.
  • Hematuria during the trial period.
  • Pregnancy or plans for it during the study.
  • The patient has had a hysterectomy.
  • Pathology of the central or peripheral nervous system.
  • Diabetes without controlled and guaranteed medical treatment its stabilization.
  • Diabetes that affects the peripheral nerves.
  • Treated with anticoagulant.
  • Current use of anticholinergics and beta adrenergic use in the last 4 weeks.
  • Currently treated with botox injections for the bladder or in the last year.
  • Current treatment with interstim or interstim device currently implanted.
  • +4 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Aníbal Báez-Suárez

Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, 35016, Spain

Location

Related Publications (10)

  • Wein AJ, Rovner ES. Definition and epidemiology of overactive bladder. Urology. 2002 Nov;60(5 Suppl 1):7-12; discussion 12. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)01784-3.

  • Tubaro A. Defining overactive bladder: epidemiology and burden of disease. Urology. 2004 Dec;64(6 Suppl 1):2-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.10.047.

  • Eapen RS, Radomski SB. Review of the epidemiology of overactive bladder. Res Rep Urol. 2016 Jun 6;8:71-6. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S102441. eCollection 2016.

  • Irwin DE, Milsom I, Hunskaar S, Reilly K, Kopp Z, Herschorn S, Coyne K, Kelleher C, Hampel C, Artibani W, Abrams P. Population-based survey of urinary incontinence, overactive bladder, and other lower urinary tract symptoms in five countries: results of the EPIC study. Eur Urol. 2006 Dec;50(6):1306-14; discussion 1314-5. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.09.019. Epub 2006 Oct 2.

  • Ganz ML, Smalarz AM, Krupski TL, Anger JT, Hu JC, Wittrup-Jensen KU, Pashos CL. Economic costs of overactive bladder in the United States. Urology. 2010 Mar;75(3):526-32, 532.e1-18. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.06.096. Epub 2009 Dec 29.

  • Lightner DJ, Gomelsky A, Souter L, Vasavada SP. Diagnosis and Treatment of Overactive Bladder (Non-Neurogenic) in Adults: AUA/SUFU Guideline Amendment 2019. J Urol. 2019 Sep;202(3):558-563. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000309. Epub 2019 Aug 8.

  • de Groat WC, Tai C. Impact of Bioelectronic Medicine on the Neural Regulation of Pelvic Visceral Function. Bioelectron Med. 2015 Jan 22;2015:25-36.

  • Jaqua K, Powell CR. Where Are We Headed with Neuromodulation for Overactive Bladder? Curr Urol Rep. 2017 Aug;18(8):59. doi: 10.1007/s11934-017-0711-x.

  • Janssen DA, Martens FM, de Wall LL, van Breda HM, Heesakkers JP. Clinical utility of neurostimulation devices in the treatment of overactive bladder: current perspectives. Med Devices (Auckl). 2017 Jun 1;10:109-122. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S115678. eCollection 2017.

  • Timmermans L, Falez F, Melot C, Wespes E. Validation of use of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence-Short Form (ICIQ-UI-SF) for impairment rating: a transversal retrospective study of 120 patients. Neurourol Urodyn. 2013 Sep;32(7):974-9. doi: 10.1002/nau.22363. Epub 2012 Dec 31.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Urinary Bladder, OveractiveUrinary IncontinenceUrologic DiseasesPelvic Floor Disorders

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Urinary Bladder DiseasesFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesMale Urogenital DiseasesLower Urinary Tract SymptomsUrological ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsUrination DisordersPregnancy Complications

Study Officials

  • Aníbal Báez-Suárez, PhD

    University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Clinical Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 6, 2019

First Posted

October 9, 2019

Study Start

November 4, 2019

Primary Completion

November 4, 2021

Study Completion

December 4, 2021

Last Updated

December 14, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations