Efficacy of Prompted Voiding Therapy in Elderly Hospitalized.
1 other identifier
interventional
158
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study evaluates effectiveness to apply prompted voiding in urinary incontinence and dependence patients admitted at functional recovery ward in a mid-stay hospital. This behavioural therapy is recommended in Best Practice Guidelines, and it has good results in elderly living in the community or in nursing home but yet it has not shown his benefits in hospitalized elderly patients for a long time.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 17, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 7, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 15, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 11, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 15, 2023
CompletedSeptember 13, 2023
September 1, 2023
3.2 years
August 17, 2019
September 12, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change of Urinary Incontinence status after prompted voiding program (PVP)
To value the efficacy of prompted voiding therapy to recovery urinary continence in elderly hospitalized at functional recovery ward. Data wil be collected from nursing assessment at admission, at discharge and telephone call.
at admission, at discharge (about 30 to 60 days), 1 , 3 and 6 month post discharge
Improve urinary incontinence episodes/symptoms after prompted voiding program.
To value the efficacy of prompted voiding therapy to improve urinary incontinence episodes/symptoms (episodes frequency, volume loss, type pad used) in elderly hospitalized at functional recovery ward. It Will be measure with assistance nurse record.
at admission, each 15 days along admission, at discharge (about 30 to 60 days).
Secondary Outcomes (18)
Change of Urinary Incontinence status after PVP in admitted patients with Stress Urinary Incontinence
at admission, at discharge.(about 30 to 60 days)
Change of Urinary Incontinence status after PVP in admitted patients with Emergency Urinary Incontinence
at admission, at discharge.(about 30 to 60 days)
Change of Urinary Incontinence status after PVP in admitted patients with Mixed Urinary Incontinence
at admission, at discharge.(about 30 to 60 days)
Change of Urinary Incontinence status after PVP in admitted patients with Functional Urinary Incontinence
at admission, at discharge.(about 30 to 60 days)
Change from Urinary Incontinence status after PVP in admitted patients with Reflects Urinary Incontinence
at admission, at discharge.(about 30 to 60 days)
- +13 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
urinary incontinence
EXPERIMENTALRecruitment, 3-day voiding record, initiate a individualized prompted voiding schedule based on the client's toileting needs until discharge, 1, 3 and 6 month follow-up post-discharge.
Interventions
Monitoring: This involves asking the incontinent individual, at regular intervals, if he or she needs to use the toilet. The care provider may look for behaviours that the client needs to be toileted (e.g., restlessness, agitation, disrobing), and take the client to the toilet at regular intervals specific to their schedule, rather than routinely every two hours. Prompting: This process includes prompting the person to use the toilet at regular intervals, and encourages the maintenance of bladder control between prompted voiding sessions. Praising: This important step is the positive reinforcement of dryness and appropriate toileting, and is the response from the care provider to the individual's success with maintaining bladder control.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- onset of Urinary Incontinence less than 1 year (information extracted from the Patient's Medical History, or provided by the patient or family caregiver)
- sign the informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- patient with indwelling urinary catheters at admission
- irreversible urinary incontinence by disease itself
- moderate-severe cognitive impairment (Pfeiffer's questionnaire \> 4)
- patients with indication of water restriction.
- patients who do not collaborate in Prompted Voiding therapy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Laura Martín Losada
Guadarrama, Madrid, 28440, Spain
Related Publications (24)
Jansen APD, Muntinga ME, Bosmans JE, Berghmans B, Dekker J, Hugtenburgh J, Nijpels G, van Houten P, Laurant MGH, van der Vaart HCH. Cost-effectiveness of a nurse-led intervention to optimise implementation of guideline-concordant continence care: Study protocol of the COCON study. BMC Nurs. 2017 Feb 22;16:10. doi: 10.1186/s12912-017-0204-8. eCollection 2017.
PMID: 28239296BACKGROUNDThuroff JW, Abrams P, Andersson KE, Artibani W, Chapple CR, Drake MJ, Hampel C, Neisius A, Schroder A, Tubaro A; European Association of Urology. [EAU Guidelines on Urinary Incontinence]. Actas Urol Esp. 2011 Jul-Aug;35(7):373-88. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2011.03.012. Epub 2011 May 19. Spanish.
PMID: 21600674BACKGROUNDPromoting Continence Using Prompted Voiding Guideline. [Internet] RNAO, 2011. Available in https://rnao.ca/bpg/guidelines/promoting-continence-using-prompted-voiding
BACKGROUNDTerzoni S, Montanari E, Mora C, Destrebecq A. Urinary incontinence in adults: nurses' beliefs, education and role in continence promotion. A narrative review. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2011 Dec;83(4):213-6.
PMID: 22670322BACKGROUNDBaztan JJ, Arias E, Gonzalez N, Rodriguez de Prada MI. New-onset urinary incontinence and rehabilitation outcomes in frail older patients. Age Ageing. 2005 Mar;34(2):172-5. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afi001. No abstract available.
PMID: 15713862BACKGROUNDRiemsma R, Hagen S, Kirschner-Hermanns R, Norton C, Wijk H, Andersson KE, Chapple C, Spinks J, Wagg A, Hutt E, Misso K, Deshpande S, Kleijnen J, Milsom I. Can incontinence be cured? A systematic review of cure rates. BMC Med. 2017 Mar 24;15(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0828-2.
PMID: 28335792BACKGROUNDHoltzer-Goor KM, Gaultney JG, van Houten P, Wagg AS, Huygens SA, Nielen MM, Albers-Heitner CP, Redekop WK, Rutten-van Molken MP, Al MJ. Cost-Effectiveness of Including a Nurse Specialist in the Treatment of Urinary Incontinence in Primary Care in the Netherlands. PLoS One. 2015 Oct 1;10(10):e0138225. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138225. eCollection 2015.
PMID: 26426124BACKGROUNDLai CKY, Wan X. Using Prompted Voiding to Manage Urinary Incontinence in Nursing Homes: Can It Be Sustained? J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Jun 1;18(6):509-514. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.12.084. Epub 2017 Feb 22.
PMID: 28236604BACKGROUNDGibson JM, Thomas LH, Harrison JJ, Watkins CL; ICONS Project Team and the ICONS Patient, Public and Carer Involvement Groups. Stroke survivors' and carers' experiences of a systematic voiding programme to treat urinary incontinence after stroke. J Clin Nurs. 2018 May;27(9-10):2041-2051. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14346.
PMID: 29517816BACKGROUNDSuzuki M, Iguchi Y, Igawa Y, Yoshida M, Sanada H, Miyazaki H, Homma Y. Ultrasound-assisted prompted voiding for management of urinary incontinence of nursing home residents: Efficacy and feasibility. Int J Urol. 2016 Sep;23(9):786-90. doi: 10.1111/iju.13156. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
PMID: 27399836BACKGROUNDThomas LH, French B, Burton CR, Sutton C, Forshaw D, Dickinson H, Leathley MJ, Britt D, Roe B, Cheater FM, Booth J, Watkins CL; ICONS Project Team; ICONS Patient, Public and Carer Involvement Groups. Evaluating a systematic voiding programme for patients with urinary incontinence after stroke in secondary care using soft systems analysis and Normalisation Process Theory: findings from the ICONS case study phase. Int J Nurs Stud. 2014 Oct;51(10):1308-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.02.009. Epub 2014 Feb 20.
PMID: 24656435BACKGROUNDHolroyd-Leduc JM, Straus SE. Management of urinary incontinence in women: scientific review. JAMA. 2004 Feb 25;291(8):986-95. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.8.986.
PMID: 14982915BACKGROUNDFranken MG, Corro Ramos I, Los J, Al MJ. The increasing importance of a continence nurse specialist to improve outcomes and save costs of urinary incontinence care: an analysis of future policy scenarios. BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Feb 17;19(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0714-9.
PMID: 29454331BACKGROUNDEustice S, Roe B, Paterson J. Prompted voiding for the management of urinary incontinence in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;2000(2):CD002113. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002113.
PMID: 10796861BACKGROUNDMorilla JC, Iglesias J, Izquierdo JM, Martín MJ, Martín MC, Rodríguez C. et al. Guía de atención enfermera a pacientes con incontinencia urinaria. Asociación Andaluza de Enfermería Comunitaria, 2007.
BACKGROUNDAbrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, Van Kerrebroeck P, Victor A, Wein A; Standardisation Sub-Committee of the International Continence Society. The standardisation of terminology in lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Urology. 2003 Jan;61(1):37-49. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)02243-4. No abstract available.
PMID: 12559262BACKGROUNDBarentsen JA, Visser E, Hofstetter H, Maris AM, Dekker JH, de Bock GH. Severity, not type, is the main predictor of decreased quality of life in elderly women with urinary incontinence: a population-based study as part of a randomized controlled trial in primary care. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012 Dec 18;10:153. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-10-153.
PMID: 23249635BACKGROUNDGarcía M. Análisis descriptivo del gasto sanitario español: evolución, desglose, comparativa internacional y relación con la renta. [Internet] Instituto de Estudios Fiscales. I.S.S.N.: 1578-0252 Available in http://www.ief.es/documentos/recursos/publicaciones/papeles_trabajo/2006_24.pdf
BACKGROUNDMiner PB Jr. Economic and personal impact of fecal and urinary incontinence. Gastroenterology. 2004 Jan;126(1 Suppl 1):S8-13. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2003.10.056.
PMID: 14978633BACKGROUNDBaena V, Blasco P, Cozar-Olmo JM, Díez-Itza I, Espuña M, Hidalgo A. Libro Blanco de la Carga Socioeconómica de la Incontinencia Urinaria en España, 2017.
BACKGROUNDMartinez Agullo E, Ruiz Cerda JL, Gomez Perez L, Ramirez Backhaus M, Delgado Oliva F, Rebollo P, Gonzalez-Segura Alsina D, Arumi D; Grupo de Estudio Cooperativo EPICC. [Prevalence of urinary incontinence and hyperactive bladder in the Spanish population: results of the EPICC study]. Actas Urol Esp. 2009 Feb;33(2):159-66. doi: 10.1016/s0210-4806(09)74117-8. Spanish.
PMID: 19418840BACKGROUNDRexach Cano, L., Verdejo Bravo, C. Incontinencia urinaria. Inf Ter Sist Nac Salud 1999; 23:149-159.
BACKGROUNDFantl JA, Newman DK, Colling J, DeLancey JO, Keeys C, Loughery R. Urinary Incontinence in Adults: Acute and Chronic Management Clinical Practice Guideline, N. 2, 1996 Update. AHCPR.
BACKGROUNDLyons SS, Specht JKP. Research-based protocol: prompted voiding for persons with urinary incontinence. The University of Iowa Gerontological Nursing Interventions Research Center, Research Development and Dissemination Core, 1999
BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Laura Martin Losada
Hospital Guadarrama
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Registered Nurse, Doctoral student.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 17, 2019
First Posted
October 7, 2019
Study Start
October 15, 2019
Primary Completion
January 11, 2023
Study Completion
July 15, 2023
Last Updated
September 13, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share