A Primary Prevention Intervention for the Promotion of Psycho-social Wellbeing in Adolescent Young Carers:
ME-WE
1 other identifier
interventional
295
6 countries
6
Brief Summary
Adolescent young carers (AYCs) are young people aged 15-17 years old, who take on significant or substantial caring tasks and assume a level of responsibility that would usually be associated with an adult. In Europe, the estimated prevalence rate of YCs is around 4-8%.Taking on care responsibilities so early in life may have considerable negative consequences for YCs' mental and physical health and psychosocial development. Psychosocial interventions to support YC worldwide are generally quite limited. The H2020 Me-We project (Psychosocial Support for Promoting Mental Health and Well-being among Adolescent Young Carers in Europe) aims to develop an innovative framework of primary prevention interventions for adolescent YCs (AYCs) aged 15-17 to be tested in six European countries (Italy, Netherlands, Slovenia, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom). The theoretical framework chosen for the intervention is the DNA-V Model. The DNA-V model is a psychological intervention, addressed to adolescents and young people, used in educational and clinical settings. This model has its roots in the contextual and functional science and it is based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, a third-generation cognitive-behavioural therapy. The intervention programme designed for the ME-WE project builds on the DNA-V model but it was adapted to fit the specific needs of adolescent young carers (AYCs) and the goals of the ME-WE project. The study aim is to evaluate the efficacy of DNA-V based program for AYCs (so-called ME-WE intervention), using a cluster-randomized controlled trial (C-RCT) design. The evaluation of the intervention will be carried out using as primary outcome variables: Psychological flexibility; Mindfulness skills; Resilience; Subjective mental health; Quality of life; Subjective health complaints; Caring-related quality of life; Cognitive and emotional impact of caring and Social support. As secondary outcome variables will be included Self-reported school, training or work experience, performance, and attendance. COVID-19 Amendment: Recruitment, should be moved to a cluster- based online recruitment or individual, social media recruitment, face-to-face sessions should be moved to online sessions using video-conferencing instruments, allowing for visual presentations of participants and session materials (e.g. ZOOM, Microsoft Teams). Four open-ended items were added to evaluation questionnaire assessing impact of COVID-19 pandemic.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_1
Started Oct 2019
6 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 22, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 3, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 20, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 20, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2021
CompletedNovember 3, 2022
November 1, 2022
1.4 years
September 22, 2019
November 2, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (9)
Change from baseline Psychological flexibility at 5 months
Avoidance and fusion questionnaire for youth (AFQ-Y; Greco, Lambert, \& Baer, 2011); 8 items on a 5-point scale (from 'not at all true' to 'very true'), overall total score.
baseline, end (after about 7 weeks), follow up after 3 months from completion
Change from baseline Mindfulness skills at 5 months
Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM; Greco, Baer, \& Smith, 2011); 10 items on a 5-point scale (from 'never true' to 'always true'), overall total score.
baseline, end (after about 7 weeks), follow up after 3 months from completion
Change from baseline Resilience at 5 months
Brief Resilience Scale (BRS; Smith 2008); six items on a 5-point Likert scale (from 'strongly disagree' to 'strongly agree'), overall total score.
baseline, end (after about 7 weeks), follow up after 3 months from completion
Change from baseline Subjective mental health at 5 months
Warwick Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS; Tennant et al., 2007); 14 items on a 5-point Likert scale ('none of the time', 'rarely', 'some of the time', 'often', 'all of the time'), overall total score.
baseline, end (after about 7 weeks), follow up after 3 months from completion
Change from baseline Quality of life at 5 months
Kidscreen 10 (RavensSieberer, \& the KIDSCREEN Group Europe, 2006); 10 items on 5-point Likert scale from 'not at all / never' to 'extremely / always'; one global health-related quality of life score.
baseline, end (after about 7 weeks), follow up after 3 months from completion
Change from baseline Subjective health complaints at 5 months
HBSC Symptom Checklist (HBSC-SCL); 8 items on a 5-point scale ('rarely or never', 'almost every month', 'more than once par week', 'almost every week', 'almost every day').
baseline, end (after about 7 weeks), follow up after 3 months from completion
Change from baseline Caring-related quality of life at 5 months
Closed ended, ad hoc questions regarding thoughts about hurting themselves/others; being bullied, teased or made fun of; and experiencing some health-related issues because of their caring role.
baseline, end (after about 7 weeks), follow up after 3 months from completion
Change from baseline Cognitive and emotional impact of caring at 5 months
Positive and Negative Outcomes of Caring (PANOC; Joseph et al., 2009; Joseph, Becker, \& Becker, 2012); 20 items on a 3-point scale: 'never', 'some of the time' and 'a lot of the time'; two scores: positive and negative outcomes.
baseline, end (after about 7 weeks), follow up after 3 months from completion
Change from baseline Social support at 5 months
: Brief Social Support Questionnaire (BSSQ; Sarason, Sarason, Shearin, \& Pierce et al., 1987); 6 items with number of support sources as the response option.
baseline, end (after about 7 weeks), follow up after 3 months from completion
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Change from baseline Self-reported school, training or work experience, performance, and attendance at 5 months
baseline, end (after about 7 weeks), follow up after 3 months from completion
Other Outcomes (5)
Control variables: 1) Caring activities
baseline, end (after about 7 weeks), follow up after 3 months from completion
2) Overall amount of caring
baseline, end (after about 7 weeks), follow up after 3 months from completion
3) Likes and dislikes about caring
baseline, end (after about 7 weeks), follow up after 3 months from completion
- +2 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Experimental
EXPERIMENTALThis arm will be receiving the 7 ME-WE sessions psycho-educational intervention. The experimental group will involve a blended approach with 'face to face' meetings in three European partner countries and online sessions (via a ME-WE mobile app) and a purely 'f2f' approach in a further three European partner countries.
Control
PLACEBO COMPARATORThe control-group will be a wait-list, receiving relaxation exercises during waiting.
Interventions
Participants of clusters allocated to the ME-WE intervention group will complete a programme based on seven weekly sessions of approximately 2 hours each, plus a follow-up meeting after 3 months from the end of the programme. All sessions maintain a similar structure (objectives, ice-breaker, central activity/ies, and final activity). At the end of some sessions, participants will be asked to do some exercises at home, between one meeting and the next one, in order to keep what has been done during the previous session fresh in their minds. Contents of sessions will be as follows: (1) Getting to know each other; (2) The Advisor: dealing with annoying thoughts; (3) The Noticer: being in connection with our feelings; (4) The Discoverer: growing and thriving; (5) Values: connecting to meaning and vitality; (6) Developing a flexible self-view and self-compassion; (7) Building strong social networks.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- being between 15 and 17 years of age;
- taking on caring tasks for family member(s) (e.g., parents, siblings, grandparents) with a disability, chronic physical and/or mental health condition or substance use issue and/or problems related to old age (Becker, 2000; Metzing-Blau \& Schnepp, 2008).
You may not qualify if:
- Concurrently participating in other psychotherapies or mindfulness-based interventions/ programmes;
- Having started a new psychotropic medication within the past 30 days or planning on starting or changing psychotropic medication during the course of the study;
- limited knowledge of local language (in all countries except Sweden)..
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Valentina Hlebeclead
- LINNEUNIVERSITETET (LNU), Sweden (leading the consortium)collaborator
- EUROCARERS-ASSOCIATION EUROPEENNE TRAVAILLANT AVEC ET POUR LEScollaborator
- THE UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX (UoS), UKcollaborator
- CARERS TRUST (Carers Trust), UKcollaborator
- STIFTUNG KALAIDOS FACHHOCHSCHULE (Kalaidos FH), SWcollaborator
- MINISTERIE VAN VOLKSGEZONDHEID, WELZIJN EN SPORT (NLNA), NLcollaborator
- STICHTING VILANS (VILANS), NLcollaborator
- ISTITUTO NAZIONALE DI RIPOSO E CURA PER ANZIANI INRCA (INRCA), ITcollaborator
- ANZIANI E NON SOLO SOCIETA COOPERATIVA SOCIALE (ANZIANI E), ITcollaborator
- UNIVERZA V LJUBLJANI (UL), SIcollaborator
- Nationellt kompetenscentrum anhöriga (Nka), (Swedish Family Care Competence Centre), Kalmar, Swedencollaborator
Study Sites (6)
Anziani e non solo soc. coop. soc
Carpi, Italy
Stichting Vilans
Utrecht, Netherlands
University of Ljubljana
Ljubljana, Slovenia
Linnaeus University, Nationellt kompetenscentrum anhöriga (Nka), (Swedish Family Care Competence Centre)
Kalmar, Sweden
Stiftung Kalaidos Fachhochschule (Kalaidos FH)
Zurich, Switzerland
Carers Trust, Print Rooms, 164-180 Union Street, London, SE1 0LN. Carers Trust will be co-ordinating the completion of the interventions for the clinical trials in the UK. All trials for the ME-WE project will be completed in England.
London, United Kingdom
Related Publications (43)
Acton, J., & Carter, B. (2016). The impact of immersive outdoor activities in local woodlands on young carers emotional literacy and well-being. Comprehensive Child and Adolescent Nursing, 39(2), 94-106.
BACKGROUNDAldridge, J. (2018). Where are we now? Twenty-five years of research, policy and practice on young carers. Critical Social Policy, 38(1), 155-165.
BACKGROUNDAssaf RR, Auf der Springe J, Siskowski C, Ludwig DA, Mathew MS, Belkowitz J. Participation Rates and Perceptions of Caregiving Youth Providing Home Health Care. J Community Health. 2016 Apr;41(2):326-33. doi: 10.1007/s10900-015-0100-7.
PMID: 26483035BACKGROUNDBecker, S. (2000). Young carers. In M. Davies (Ed.), The Blackwell encyclopedia of social work (3rd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
BACKGROUNDBecker, S. (2007). Global perspectives on children's unpaid caregiving in the family: Research and policy on 'young carers' in the UK, Australia, the USA and Sub-Saharan Africa. Global Social Policy, 7(1), 23-50.
BACKGROUNDCampbell MK, Piaggio G, Elbourne DR, Altman DG; CONSORT Group. Consort 2010 statement: extension to cluster randomised trials. BMJ. 2012 Sep 4;345:e5661. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e5661. No abstract available.
PMID: 22951546BACKGROUNDCohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
BACKGROUNDCunningham, L. C., Shochet, I. M., Smith, C. L., & Wurfl, A. (2017). A qualitative evaluation of an innovative resilience-building camp for young carers. Child & Family Social Work, 22(2), 700-710.
BACKGROUNDDaniel, W. W. (1999). Biostatistics: A foundation for analysis in the health sciences (7th ed.). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
BACKGROUNDFraser E, Pakenham KI. Evaluation of a resilience-based intervention for children of parents with mental illness. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2008 Dec;42(12):1041-50. doi: 10.1080/00048670802512065.
PMID: 19016092BACKGROUNDGettings S, Franco F, Santosh PJ. Facilitating support groups for siblings of children with neurodevelopmental disorders using audio-conferencing: a longitudinal feasibility study. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2015 Apr 7;9:8. doi: 10.1186/s13034-015-0041-z. eCollection 2015.
PMID: 25866558BACKGROUNDGreco LA, Baer RA, Smith GT. Assessing mindfulness in children and adolescents: development and validation of the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM). Psychol Assess. 2011 Sep;23(3):606-14. doi: 10.1037/a0022819.
PMID: 21480722BACKGROUNDGreco LA, Lambert W, Baer RA. Psychological inflexibility in childhood and adolescence: development and evaluation of the Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth. Psychol Assess. 2008 Jun;20(2):93-102. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.20.2.93.
PMID: 18557686BACKGROUNDSchlarmann JG, Metzing S, Schoppmann S, Schnepp W. Germany's First Young Carers Project's Impact on the Children: Relieving the Entire Family. A Qualitative Evaluation. Open Nurs J. 2011;5:86-94. doi: 10.2174/1874434601105010086. Epub 2011 Oct 26.
PMID: 22135716BACKGROUNDHalliburton, A. E., & Cooper, L. D. (2015). Applications and adaptations of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) for adolescents. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 4(1), 1-11.
BACKGROUNDHamilton, M. G., & Adamson, E. (2013). Bounded agency in young carers' lifecourse-stage domains and transitions. Journal of Youth Studies, 16(1), 101-117.
BACKGROUNDHamilton, M., & Cass, B. (2017). Capturing the centrality of age and life-course stage in the provision of unpaid care. Journal of Sociology, 53(1), 79-93.
BACKGROUNDHarris, R. (2009). ACT made simple: An easy-to-read primer on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger.
BACKGROUNDHayes, L., & Ciarrochi, J. (2015). The Thriving Adolescent: Using acceptance and commitment therapy and positive psychology to help teens manage emotions, achieve goals, and build positive connections. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger.
BACKGROUNDHayes, S., Wilson, K., & Strosahl, K. (1999). Acceptance and commitment therapy: An experiential approach to behavior change. New York: Guilford.
BACKGROUNDHeyman, A. (2013). Partnership working between young carers project and social services. Social Work and Social Sciences Review, 16(3), 50-64.
BACKGROUNDHeyman, A., & Heyman, B. (2013). 'The sooner you can change their life course the better': The time-framing of risks in relationship to being a young carer. Health, Risk & Society, 15(6-7), 561-579.
BACKGROUNDJärkestig-Berggren, U., Bergman, A. S., Eriksson, M., & Priebe, G. (2018). Young carers in Sweden-A pilot study of care activities, view of caring, and psychological well-being. Child & Family Social Work.
BACKGROUNDJoseph S, Becker S, Becker F, Regel S. Assessment of caring and its effects in young people: development of the Multidimensional Assessment of Caring Activities Checklist (MACA-YC18) and the Positive and Negative Outcomes of Caring Questionnaire (PANOC-YC20) for young carers. Child Care Health Dev. 2009 Jul;35(4):510-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2009.00959.x. Epub 2009 Mar 23.
PMID: 19320904BACKGROUNDJoseph S, Kendall C, Toher D, Sempik J, Holland J, Becker S. Young carers in England: Findings from the 2018 BBC survey on the prevalence and nature of caring among young people. Child Care Health Dev. 2019 Jul;45(4):606-612. doi: 10.1111/cch.12674. Epub 2019 May 24.
PMID: 30995694BACKGROUNDKallander, E. K., Weimand, B., Ruud, T., Becker, S., Van Roy, B., & Hanssen-Bauer, K. (2018). Outcomes for children who care for a parent with a severe illness or substance abuse. Child & Youth Services. https://doi.org/10.1080/0145935X.2018.1491302
BACKGROUNDKallapiran K, Koo S, Kirubakaran R, Hancock K. Review: Effectiveness of mindfulness in improving mental health symptoms of children and adolescents: a meta-analysis. Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2015 Nov;20(4):182-194. doi: 10.1111/camh.12113. Epub 2015 Sep 8.
PMID: 32680348BACKGROUNDLeu, A., Frech, M., Wepf, H., Sempik, J., Joseph, S., Helbling, L., ... & Jung, C. (2018). Counting young carers in Switzerland - A study of prevalence. Children & Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12296
BACKGROUNDLeu, A., & Becker, S. (2017). A cross-national and comparative classification of in-country awareness and policy responses to 'young carers'. Journal of Youth Studies, 20(6), 750-762.
BACKGROUNDLloyd, K. (2013). Happiness and well-being of young carers: Extent, nature and correlates of caring among 10 and 11 year old school children. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(1), 67-80.
BACKGROUNDMerry SN, Hetrick SE, Cox GR, Brudevold-Iversen T, Bir JJ, McDowell H. Psychological and educational interventions for preventing depression in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Dec 7;(12):CD003380. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003380.pub3.
PMID: 22161377BACKGROUNDMetzing-Blau S, Schnepp W. Young carers in Germany: to live on as normal as possible - a grounded theory study. BMC Nurs. 2008 Dec 24;7:15. doi: 10.1186/1472-6955-7-15.
PMID: 19108719BACKGROUNDNagl-Cupal M, Daniel M, Koller MM, Mayer H. Prevalence and effects of caregiving on children. J Adv Nurs. 2014 Oct;70(10):2314-25. doi: 10.1111/jan.12388. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
PMID: 24660847BACKGROUNDPetts, R. A., Duenas, J. A., & Gaynor, S. T. (2017). Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for adolescent depression: Application with a diverse and predominantly socioeconomically disadvantaged sample. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 6(2), 134-144.
BACKGROUNDPurcal, C., Hamilton, M., Thomson, C., & Cass, B. (2012). From assistance to prevention: Categorizing young carer support services in Australia, and international implications. Social Policy & Administration, 46(7), 788-806.
BACKGROUNDSarason, I. G., Sarason, B. R., Shearin, E. N., & Pierce, G. R. (1987). A brief measure of social support: Practical and theoretical implications. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 4(4), 497-510.
BACKGROUNDSmith BW, Dalen J, Wiggins K, Tooley E, Christopher P, Bernard J. The brief resilience scale: assessing the ability to bounce back. Int J Behav Med. 2008;15(3):194-200. doi: 10.1080/10705500802222972.
PMID: 18696313BACKGROUNDStamatopoulos, V. (2016). Supporting young carers: a qualitative review of young carer services in Canada. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 21(2), 178-194.
BACKGROUNDSwain, J., Hancock, K., Dixon, A., & Bowman, J. (2015). Acceptance and commitment therapy for children: A systematic review of intervention studies. Journal of Contextual Behavioural Science, 4, 73-85.
BACKGROUNDSwain, J., Hancock, K., Hainsworth, C., & Bowman, J. (2015). Mechanisms of change: Exploratory outcomes from a randomised controlled trial of acceptance and commitment therapy for anxious adolescents. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 1(4), 56-67.
BACKGROUNDTennant R, Hiller L, Fishwick R, Platt S, Joseph S, Weich S, Parkinson J, Secker J, Stewart-Brown S. The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validation. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007 Nov 27;5:63. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-5-63.
PMID: 18042300BACKGROUNDHanson E, Barbabella F, Magnusson L, Brolin R, Svensson M, Yghemonos S, Hlebec V, Bolko I, Boccaletti L, Casu G, Hoefman R, de Boer AH, de Roos S, Santini S, Socci M, D'Amen B, Van Zoest F, de Jong N, Nap HH, de Jong Y, Bouwman T, Lewis F, Parkhouse T, Leu A, Phelps D, Guggiari E, Morgan V, Centola F, Joseph S, Becker S. Research and Innovation for and with Adolescent Young Carers to Influence Policy and Practice-The European Union Funded "ME-WE" Project. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 11;19(16):9932. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19169932.
PMID: 36011572DERIVEDCasu G, Hlebec V, Boccaletti L, Bolko I, Manattini A, Hanson E. Promoting Mental Health and Well-Being among Adolescent Young Carers in Europe: A Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 19;18(4):2045. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18042045.
PMID: 33669796DERIVED
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Elizabeth J Hanson, PhD Nursing
Linneus University, Kalmar, Sweden
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- prof. dr. Valentina Hlebec; wp6 leader
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 22, 2019
First Posted
October 3, 2019
Study Start
October 20, 2019
Primary Completion
March 20, 2021
Study Completion
June 30, 2021
Last Updated
November 3, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
- Time Frame
- After the completion of the project, but the date is unknown.
- Access Criteria
- not yet known
Anonymized evaluation data to be stored in data archive with limited access.