Comparison of an Alginate Containing Enteral Feed and an Alginate Free Enteral Feed.
AlgiNG
Gastric, Biochemical, Endocrine and Appetitive Responses to an Enterally Fed Alginate-containing Feed, Compared With an Alginate Free Feed
1 other identifier
interventional
12
1 country
1
Brief Summary
When patients cannot eat and drink enough a tube can be placed through their nostril, down the back of their throat into their stomach and used to give their nutrition as a liquid feed. One of the commonest problems when using this tube is regurgitation of feed up from the stomach (gastro- oesophageal reflux (GOR)), or liquid stools (diarrhoea). This can cause the patient discomfort, a higher risk of getting a skin or chest infection, and increase the risk that the feed is stopped. The investigators intend to investigate, in twelve healthy young men, whether adding a form of dietary fibre (alginate) to the feed could reduce these symptoms (diarrhoea and GOR), hence ensuring patients are properly nourished and recover as quickly as possible from their illness, Each volunteer will come to the lab twice and will have a tube inserted into the stomach via the nose so that they can be given both feeds. Each time, the investigators will take repeated pictures of how the feed is passing through their gut using a non invasive technique called 'magnetic resonance imaging' (MRI), take blood samples to see how quickly the nutrition is absorbed into the blood, and measure how hungry they feel
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 29, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 11, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 2, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 30, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 30, 2020
CompletedSeptember 23, 2022
September 1, 2022
1.2 years
July 11, 2019
September 21, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Small bowel water response to feeding
Area under the curve for small bowel water measured by MRI over four hours from baseline.
After four hours from baseline
Secondary Outcomes (14)
Gastric volume relative to baseline
After four hours from baseline
Mean post feeding gastric emptying rate
Over four hours from baseline.
Superior mesenteric blood flow
Over four hours from baseline.
Incremental area under the curve for arterialised whole blood glucose
Over four hours post baseline
Incremental area under the curve for insulin
Over four hours from baseline
- +9 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
F+ALG
EXPERIMENTALAn alginate containing feed: MerMed One (Kaneka Corporation). 300mls administered nasogastrically over one hour.
F-ALG
OTHERA standard enteral feed commonly used in practice. Nutricomp Soy Fibre (B.Braun). 300mls administered nasogastrically over one hour.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Non- smoking (non- vaping) males
- aged 18- 45 years
- body mass index (BMI) of 18.5-24.5kg/ m2 or a BMI of 24.5- 26kg/ m2
- a waist circumference of less than 94 cm.
- ability to give informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- A history of an acute illness, lasting more than a week, in the last six weeks;
- taking any medications for gastrointestinal disorders, including acid suppressants or anti-spasmodics,
- taking anti-depressants or symptoms of clinical depression (defined by a score \>10 on the Beck Depression Inventory)
- taking medication for diabetes or having diabetes
- a history of substance abuse in the last six months;
- having any factors that preclude safe MRI;
- a history of gastrointestinal disorders, including Gastro Oesophgeal Reflux Disease, Irritable Bowel Syndrome, active peptic ulcer disease; having diabetes;
- previous surgery to the gastrointestinal or biliary systems;
- having characteristics of those with an eating disorders (defined by a score of more than 20 on the Eating Attitudes Test (EAT-26));
- having an allergy or intolerance to the ingredients in the enteral feeds, or the cheese and tomato pasta meal
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Nottinghamlead
- Kaneka Corporationcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
The University of Nottingham
Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG7 2RD, United Kingdom
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Moira Taylor, PhD
University of Nottingham
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- On each study day, when the feed is administered, the Principle investigator (if present) and the research nurse administering the feed and obtaining blood samples are aware of which enteral feed will be given, but the MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) scanner, and researcher collecting outcome data will not be.
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 11, 2019
First Posted
October 2, 2019
Study Start
January 29, 2019
Primary Completion
March 30, 2020
Study Completion
March 30, 2020
Last Updated
September 23, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- When requested.
- Access Criteria
- On receipt of requests, data will be made accessible if agreed by both the University of Nottingham and Kaneka Corporation.
Only anonymised individual personal data will be shared, upon specific request from other researchers, for example, in order to undertake a meta analysis.