Motor Control Training in Individuals With Subacromial Pain Syndrome
1 other identifier
interventional
34
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The porpusose of this study is to evaluate the repercussions of a motor control exercise protocol in patients with subacromial pain syndrome without indication of surgical repair.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 17, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 28, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 26, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 30, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 30, 2020
CompletedApril 30, 2021
April 1, 2021
8 months
June 28, 2019
April 29, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Shoulder pain
Evaluation of pain level in the shoulder using the Numerical Pain Scale, graded from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates absence of pain and 10 indicates the worst pain imaginable.
Change from baseline in shoulder pain at 4 weeks, 8 weeks and follow up of 4 weeks after the intervention protocol
Shoulder function
Evaluation of shoulder pain and function using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH). The questionnaire is a self-administered region-specific outcome instrument developed as a measure of self-rated upper-extremity disability and symptoms. The DASH consists mainly of a 30-item disability/symptom scale, scored 0 (no disability) to 100. The higher the score, the greater the functional disability.
Change from baseline in shoulder function at 4 weeks, 8 weeks and follow up of 4 weeks after the intervention protocol
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Root Mean Square (RMS)
Change from baseline in RMS at 4 weeks, 8 weeks and follow up of 4 weeks after the intervention protocol
The kinematics of the scapula
Change from baseline in kinematics of the scapular girdle at 4 weeks, 8 weeks and follow up of 4 weeks after the intervention protocol
Peak of muscular torque
Change from baseline in peak of muscular torque at 4 weeks, 8 weeks and follow up of 4 weeks after the intervention protocol
Peak torque time
Change from baseline in peak torque time at 4 weeks, 8 weeks and follow up of 4 weeks after the intervention protocol
Range of motion
Change from baseline in range of motion at 4 weeks, 8 weeks and follow up of 4 weeks after the intervention protocol
Study Arms (2)
motor control training
EXPERIMENTAL8-week exercise program, twice a week, with motor control training
exercises
ACTIVE COMPARATOR8-week exercise program, twice a week.
Interventions
The volunteers of the motor control group will initiate the exercises on a stable and rigid basis. These will be progressed with adding an unstable base as the volunteer gains motor learning (between the fourth and fifth week of the protocol). For the motor control group, two sets of 10 repetitions will be performed keeping in isometry for ten seconds each repetition.
the protocol of strengthening and will have five elastic bands with different resistances available (extra-light, light, moderate, strong and extra-strong) for elbow flexion exercises progression, medial rotation and lateral rotation of the shoulder and scapular retraction.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Present subacromial pain with a score greater than or equal to 2 (Visual Analog Scale) for more than 2 months;
- Positive Neer test;
- Positive Hawkins test;
- Positive Jobe test (pain);
- Positive Patte test (pain);
- Involvement of the supraspinatus and / or infraspinatus tendon (without degenerative characteristics) confirmed by Magnetic Nuclear Resonance (MRI) examination.
You may not qualify if:
- Intense pain during the evaluations;
- Fail to properly perform the evaluation procedures;
- Two consecutive or five alternating absences during the training protocol.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Jamilson S Brasileiro
Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, 59140-840, Brazil
Karinna Sonálya Aires da Costa
Parnamirim, Rio Grande do Norte, 59152820, Brazil
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 28, 2019
First Posted
September 26, 2019
Study Start
June 17, 2019
Primary Completion
January 30, 2020
Study Completion
January 30, 2020
Last Updated
April 30, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share