Pre-therapeutic MRI Assessment of Early-Stage Rectal Cancer and Significant Rectal Polyps to Avoid Major Resectional Surgery
PRESERVE
1 other identifier
interventional
200
1 country
23
Brief Summary
When a patient is diagnosed with a rectal (bowel) polyp or cancer, radiology doctors read MRI scans to describe how deeply the cancer invades into the bowel wall (this is the 'stage' of the cancer). In this project, we will teach radiologists to find more early-stage rectal cancers. These are cancers that have only grown partially into the bowel wall. If we succeed, more patients could have these lesions removed by a local procedure that preserves the bowel and avoids the risks and complications of major surgery. We have developed a new method for radiology doctors to read MRI scans, which is more accurate than current practice. Currently only 3/10 of early rectal cancers are found by radiologists but by using our MRI reading system, 9/10 patients can be accurately identified as having early rectal cancer. We have proven that we can teach this method to other radiology doctors whose reports help to accurately inform patients of all possible treatment options, so they can be offered the option of a local procedure. In this initial work we will train radiology doctors in our MRI reading method in 20 hospitals. We will compare MRI reports before and after training to see if an accurate reading method improves treatments choices for patients. We will also determine whether more patients have local procedures after our training. The results of this initial work will help us to apply for national funding for a trial that we can quickly roll out to all NHS hospitals.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2024
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
23 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 5, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 25, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2031
November 4, 2024
October 1, 2024
2.3 years
September 5, 2019
October 30, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Impact of a training intervention on the accuracy of the tumour staging diagnosis through systematic reporting approach to MRI scans against current (pre intervention) practice.
Comparison of the proportion of patients with early rectal cancer who are diagnosed by pathology vs those staged as such by MRI, before and after the intervention.
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (18)
Proportion of patients with technically adequacate scans before and after intervention
1 year
Proportion of primary tumour characterised by morphology and other features associated with malignancy before and after intervention
1 year
Proportion of MRI reports with T substage given before and after intervention
1 year
Number of patients identified on imaging as suitable for rectal preservation by local excision
1 year
Number of patients identified by MDT as suitable for rectal preservation by local excision
1 year
- +13 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Control Arm Schedule
NO INTERVENTIONAll sites will begin in the Control arm, with patients recruited to the Control Arm Schedule. Clinical investigations prior to treatment, during treatment, after surgery and during further treatment should be performed as per standard clinical practice and as clinically indicated. Each site will transition to the Intervention arm at a month prescribed by their randomised cluster, and from that point patients are recruited to the Intervention Arm Schedule . Patients will be recruited to either the Control or Intervention arms dependent on which arm is in progress at the site at the time of recruitment. There will be no crossover of patients between the arms at any point.
Intervention Arm Schedule
EXPERIMENTALEach site will transition to the Intervention arm at a month prescribed by their randomised cluster, and from that point patients are recruited to the Intervention Arm Schedule . The transition period lasts one month during which recruitment is halted and two interventions implemented: 1. MRI scans will be recommended for all rectal polyps ≥20mm in size, or with other features suspicious of malignancy, prior to removal. This is designed to reduce the numbers of Early Rectal Cancers missed in endoscopy. 2. Radiologist training in the use of the PRESERVE mrSRT for suspected Early Rectal Cancer. Patients will be recruited to either the Control or Intervention arms dependent on which arm is in progress at the site at the time of recruitment. There will be no crossover of patients between the arms at any point.
Interventions
MRI scans will be recommended for all rectal polyps ≥20mm in size, or with other features suspicious of malignancy, prior to removal. This is designed to reduce the numbers of Early Rectal Cancers missed in endoscopy.
Radiologist training in the use of the PRESERVE mrSRT for suspected Early Rectal Cancer.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Have a rectal tumour or suspected tumour less than or equal to T3b on MRI stage or pT2 or less after excision, or 20mm or more on endoscopy with suspicion of malignancy
- Be aged 16 years or over
You may not qualify if:
- Have metastatic disease at time of initial staging
- Have a biopsy-proven rectal malignancy which is not adenocarcinoma
- Are contraindicated for MRI
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Imperial College Londonlead
- Pelican Cancer Foundationcollaborator
- RM Partners West London Cancer Alliancecollaborator
Study Sites (23)
Royal Berkshire Hospital
Reading, Berkshire, RG1 5AN, United Kingdom
Buckinghamshire Healthcare Nhs Trust
Amersham, Buckinghamshire, AMERSHAM, United Kingdom
University College London Hospitals Nhs Foundation Trust
London, Greater London, NW1 2PG, United Kingdom
King'S College Hospital Nhs Foundation Trust
London, Greater London, SE5 9RS, United Kingdom
West Middlesex Hospital
London, Greater London, SW10 9NH, United Kingdom
Imperial College Healthcare Nhs Trus
London, Greater London, W2 1BL, United Kingdom
The Hillingdon Hospitals Nhs Foundation Trust
Uxbridge, Greater London, UB8 3NN, United Kingdom
Hampshire Hospitals Nhs Foundation Trust
Basingstoke, Hampshire, RG24 9NA, United Kingdom
Southampton General Hospital
Southampton, Hampshire, SO16 6YD, United Kingdom
Kent & Canterbury Hospital
Canterbury, KENT, CT1 3NG, United Kingdom
Maidstone Hospital
Maidstone, KENT, ME16 9QQ, United Kingdom
Westmorland General Hospital
Kendal, Lancashire, LA9 7RG, United Kingdom
Leicester Royal Infirmary
Leicester, Leicestershire, LE1 5WW, United Kingdom
St George'S Hospital
Tooting, London, SW17 0QT, United Kingdom
John Radcliffe Hospital
Oxford, Oxfordshire, OX3 9DU, United Kingdom
Nhs Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent Integrated Care Board
Stafford, Staffordshire, ST16 2LP, United Kingdom
Frimley Health Nhs Foundation Trust
Camberley, Surrey, GU16 7UJ, United Kingdom
St Helier Hospital
Carshalton, Surrey, SM5 1AA, United Kingdom
Kingston Hospital Nhs Foundation Trust
Kingston upon Thames, Surrey, KT2 7QB, United Kingdom
Croydon Health Services Nhs Trust
Thornton Heath, Surrey, CR7 7YE, United Kingdom
Tonna Hospital
Swansea, Wales, SA11 3LX, United Kingdom
Salisbury District Hospital
Salisbury, Wiltshire, SP2 8BJ, United Kingdom
St Marks Bowel Cancer Screening Centre
Harrow, HA1 3UJ, United Kingdom
Related Publications (2)
Detering R, van Oostendorp SE, Meyer VM, van Dieren S, Bos ACRK, Dekker JWT, Reerink O, van Waesberghe JHTM, Marijnen CAM, Moons LMG, Beets-Tan RGH, Hompes R, van Westreenen HL, Tanis PJ, Tuynman JB; Dutch ColoRectal Audit Group*. MRI cT1-2 rectal cancer staging accuracy: a population-based study. Br J Surg. 2020 Sep;107(10):1372-1382. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11590. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
PMID: 32297326BACKGROUNDBalyasnikova S, Read J, Wotherspoon A, Rasheed S, Tekkis P, Tait D, Cunningham D, Brown G. Diagnostic accuracy of high-resolution MRI as a method to predict potentially safe endoscopic and surgical planes in patients with early rectal cancer. BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2017 Aug 14;4(1):e000151. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2017-000151. eCollection 2017.
PMID: 29259791BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gina Brown, MD
Imperial College London
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 5, 2019
First Posted
September 25, 2019
Study Start
September 1, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2031
Last Updated
November 4, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share