A Prospective Randomized Study of General Anesthesia Versus Anesthetist Administered Sedation for ERCP
RAGE
1 other identifier
observational
204
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Currently there no standard sedation techniques for performing ERCP. It is not clear whether sedation administered by anesthetist is better than anesthesia with intratracheal intubation. To clarify which of these sedative methods are better we plan to conduct a randomized trial comparing anesthetist administered sedation with general anesthesia in patients with ASA ≤3.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Sep 2019
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 8, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 8, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 23, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 20, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 20, 2022
CompletedApril 6, 2022
April 1, 2022
2.7 years
May 8, 2019
April 5, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The safety of anesthetist administered sedation (AAS) with general anesthesia for ERCP.
Significant cardiopulmonary complications will be defined as 1) Hypotension - when systolic BP drops below 25% of the baseline measurement requiring vasopressor drugs; 2) Cardiac Arrythmia - Bradycardia when heart rate drops below 50 beats/min or rises above 120 beats/min requiring treatment; 3) Hypoxia - when oxygen saturation falls below 90%; 4) Hypercapnia - when expiratory carbon dioxide increase by more than 25% from the baseline; 5) Apnea when respiratory activity ceases for ≥10 seconds via capnography; 6) Any interruption or termination of ERCP procedure related to sedation
2 years
Secondary Outcomes (1)
-The patient and endoscopist satisfaction with both types of sedation -The recovery time of AAS and general anesthesia
2 years
Study Arms (2)
General Anesthesia
All the patients will be intubated and ventilated using cisatracurium (0.15 mg/kg) as a muscle relaxant and propofol (1.5-2mg/kg) for induction. The inhalational anesthetic, sevoflurane, will be used to maintain the depth of anesthesia using 50% mix of nitrous oxide and oxygen. Fentanyl will be used in both groups at a rate of 1-2 microgram /kg to achieve an adequate level of analgesia in both groups.
Anesthetist Administered sedation for ERCP
To ensure a steady level of AAS each patient in this group will be sedated using propofol. An induction bolus of propofol (0.5 - 1 mg/kg) will be administered followed by continuous infusion with variable doses depending on the patients' age, weight, and clinical condition. In addition, fentanyl 1.5 μg/kg will be used at the anesthetist discretion.
Eligibility Criteria
all consecutive patients referred for ERCP who meet the below criteria will be approached to participate in the study
You may qualify if:
- Age \>18 years
- Referred for ERCP
- Assessed by anesthetist
- ASA 1-3
You may not qualify if:
- Emergency situation (upper GI bleed, on mechanical ventilation)
- ASA class ≥4
- Distorted anatomy - like partial or total gastrectomy
- Pregnancy
- Unable to give or obtain consent and/ or disturbed level of consciousness
- Suspected difficult intubation using Ganzouri score \> than 5 (18).
- Allergy to any study medication.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
King Abdullah Medical City, Holy Capital
Mecca, Makkah Western, 21955, Saudi Arabia
Related Publications (1)
Alzanbagi AB, Jilani TL, Qureshi LA, Ibrahim IM, Tashkandi AMS, Elshrief EEA, Khan MS, Abdelhalim MAH, Zahrani SA, Mohamed WMK, Nageeb AM, Abbushi B, Shariff MK. Randomized trial comparing general anesthesia with anesthesiologist-administered deep sedation for ERCP in average-risk patients. Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 Dec;96(6):983-990.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.06.003. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
PMID: 35690151DERIVED
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 8, 2019
First Posted
September 23, 2019
Study Start
September 8, 2019
Primary Completion
May 20, 2022
Study Completion
May 20, 2022
Last Updated
April 6, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share