Ultrasonography Biofeedback for Diaphragm Training in Athletes With Lumbo-pelvic Pain
Effectiveness of Ultrasonography Biofeedback for Diaphragm Training in Athletes With Non-specific Lumpo-pelvic Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Objective: To determine the effectiveness of diaphragm biofeedback reeducation by ultrasonography in conjunction with high-intensity inspiratory muscle training versus isolated high-intensity inspiratory muscle training in athletes with lumbo-pelvic pain. Methods: A single blinded randomized clinical trial will be carried out. A total sample of 80 athletes with lumbo-pelvic pain will be recruited and randomized into 2 groups: one group will be treated by isolated high-intensity inspiratory muscle training during 8 weeks, and another group will be treated with diaphragm biofeedback reeducation by ultrasonography during 6 weeks in conjunction with high-intensity inspiratory muscle training during 8 weeks. Outcome measurements will be diaphragm muscle thickness evaluated by ultrasonography (main outcome measurement), pain intensity, pressure pain threshold, disability, quality of life and respiratory parameters by spirometry, which will be assessed before and after intervention.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2020
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 17, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 20, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2022
CompletedSeptember 20, 2019
September 1, 2019
1.7 years
September 17, 2019
September 18, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Diaphragm muscle thickness
Diaphragm muscle thickness evaluated in centimeters by ultrasonography
Change from Baseline diaphragm muscle thickness at 8 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Pressure pain threshold
Change from Baseline pressure pain threshold at 8 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Diaphragm biofeedback reeducation plus inspiratory training
EXPERIMENTALIsolated high-intensity inspiratory muscle training
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Diaphragm biofeedback reeducation plus inspiratory training during 6 weeks
Isolated high-intensity inspiratory muscle training during 8 weeks
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Athletes with non-specific lumbopelvic pain during 6 weeks
You may not qualify if:
- Neural disorders
- Systemic disorders
- Cognitive disorders
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Madrid, 28040, Spain
Related Publications (3)
Calvo-Lobo C, Almazan-Polo J, Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo R, Losa-Iglesias ME, Palomo-Lopez P, Rodriguez-Sanz D, Lopez-Lopez D. Ultrasonography comparison of diaphragm thickness and excursion between athletes with and without lumbopelvic pain. Phys Ther Sport. 2019 May;37:128-137. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2019.03.015. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
PMID: 30954705BACKGROUNDCalvo-Lobo C, Painceira-Villar R, Lopez-Lopez D, Garcia-Paz V, Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo R, Losa-Iglesias ME, Palomo-Lopez P. Tarsal Tunnel Mechanosensitivity Is Increased in Patients with Asthma: A Case-Control Study. J Clin Med. 2018 Dec 12;7(12):541. doi: 10.3390/jcm7120541.
PMID: 30545067BACKGROUNDCalvo-Lobo C, Diez-Vega I, Martinez-Pascual B, Fernandez-Martinez S, de la Cueva-Reguera M, Garrosa-Martin G, Rodriguez-Sanz D. Tensiomyography, sonoelastography, and mechanosensitivity differences between active, latent, and control low back myofascial trigger points: A cross-sectional study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Mar;96(10):e6287. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006287.
PMID: 28272251BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 17, 2019
First Posted
September 20, 2019
Study Start
May 1, 2020
Primary Completion
January 1, 2022
Study Completion
May 1, 2022
Last Updated
September 20, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-09