Innovative Models in the Rehabilitation of the Elderly With Hip Fractures Through Technological Innovation
Assistive Robotic in the Elderly: Innovative Models in the Rehabilitation of the Elderly With Hip Fractures Through Technological Innovation
1 other identifier
interventional
195
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The final goals of the present study is to propose a new approach in the hip fracture rehabilitation in elderly subjects, focused on the use of robotic device and to check the results not only at the end of the treatment but also in the long term, foreseeing 3 follow-up.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Nov 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 16, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 19, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 26, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 30, 2024
CompletedOctober 23, 2023
October 1, 2023
4.3 years
September 16, 2019
October 20, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
difference in falling risk among virtual reality games arm, robotic treadmill arm and control arm
falling risk will be evaluated by the Tinetti performance oriented mobility assessment (POMA). POMA test has two subscales, Balance and Gait sections. Total score is obtained by adding the scores of the two subscales (balance + gait) . Total score \< 19 high fall risk, total score 19-24 medium fall risk, total score 25-28 low fall risk
before treatment, and 5 weeks, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months after intervention commencement
Secondary Outcomes (2)
difference in gait performance among virtual reality games arm, robotic treadmill arm and control arm
before treatment, and 5 weeks, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months after intervention commencement
difference in fear of falling among virtual reality games arm, robotic treadmill arm and control arm
before treatment, and 5 weeks, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months after intervention commencement
Study Arms (3)
control group
ACTIVE COMPARATORTen traditional physical treatment sessions divided into 2 training sessions per week for 5 weeks
virtual reality games arm
EXPERIMENTALTen technological treatment sessions divided into 2 training sessions per week for 5 weeks.
robotic treadmill arm
EXPERIMENTALTen traditional physical treatment sessions divided into 2 training sessions per week for 5 weeks.
Interventions
Each session will include 50 minutes of traditional physical rehabilitation therapy
Each session will include 30 minutes of traditional physical rehabilitation therapy followed by 20 minutes of robotic training by Tymo system (Tyromotion, Austria), a wireless platform for the balance and the postural control training that simulates floor walking and stairs climbing. Tymo system is connected to a screen and provides virtual reality games, adaptable to the functional capacity of the patient. Through the games proposed, the physiotherapist will decide to work in a dimension (antero-posterior or medio-lateral dimension) or in two dimensions (combining the antero-posterior and medio-lateral movements).
Each session will include 30 minutes of traditional physical rehabilitation therapy followed by 20 minutes of robotic training by Walker view (TecnoBody, Italy), a treadmill equipped with a sensorized belt with eight load cells and a 3D camera.to detect length, speed and symmetry of the pace and load, range of the trunk, hips and knees. Patients will be asked to walk at a comfortable speed, while the physiotherapist will be able to work on different parameters such as step length, load distribution, and step height. The setting will take place taking into account the clinical conditions of each patient, customizing the intervention. The Walker View will offer visual and auditory feedback to the patient, so as to correct gait in real time.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Capacity to consent
- Traumatic event within 60 days
- Romberg test: negative
- Functional Ambulation Category (FAC) score ≤ 2
- Ranking scale score ≤ 3;
You may not qualify if:
- Past history of syncopal episodes
- Presence of non-pharmacologically compensated behavioral syndromes
- Presence of pain that prevents walking or standing
- Presence of neurological pathologies that compromise balance (Multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, stroke, ataxias, poliomyelitis)
- Spinal stenosis
- Radiculopathy
- Neuropathies lower limbs
- Disabling disabilities that impair walking (eg congenital malformations of the foot)
- Heterometry \> 2 cm
- Clinical dementia rating (CDR) score ≥ 3
- Severe systemic diseases with life expectancy \< 1 year
- Patients unable to follow up.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
INRCA Research Hospital
Ancona, 60131, Italy
INRCA Research Hospital
Fermo, Italy
Related Publications (2)
Fairhall NJ, Dyer SM, Mak JC, Diong J, Kwok WS, Sherrington C. Interventions for improving mobility after hip fracture surgery in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 7;9(9):CD001704. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001704.pub5.
PMID: 36070134DERIVEDMaranesi E, Riccardi GR, Lattanzio F, Di Rosa M, Luzi R, Casoni E, Rinaldi N, Baldoni R, Di Donna V, Bevilacqua R. Randomised controlled trial assessing the effect of a technology-assisted gait and balance training on mobility in older people after hip fracture: study protocol. BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 15;10(6):e035508. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035508.
PMID: 32546491DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Giovanni Riccardi
IRCCS-INRCA
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 16, 2019
First Posted
September 19, 2019
Study Start
November 26, 2019
Primary Completion
March 30, 2024
Study Completion
March 30, 2024
Last Updated
October 23, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-10