Innovative Models in the Rehabilitation of the Elderly With Parkinson's Disease Through Technological Innovation
Assistive Robotic in the Elderly: Innovative Models in the Rehabilitation of the Elderly With Parkinson's Disease Through Technological Innovation
1 other identifier
interventional
195
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The final goal of the present study is to propose a new approach in the Parkinson's Disease rehabilitation, focused on the use of robotic devices and to check the results not only at the end of the treatment but also in the long term, foreseeing 3 follow-up.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable parkinson-disease
Started Dec 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable parkinson-disease
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 10, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 12, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 3, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2026
October 23, 2023
October 1, 2023
7.1 years
September 10, 2019
October 20, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
difference in falling risk among virtual reality games arm, robotic treadmill arm and control arm
falling risk will be evaluated by the Tinetti performance oriented mobility assessment (POMA). POMA test has two subscales, Balance and Gait sections. Total score is obtained by adding the scores of the two subscales (balance + gait) . Total score \< 19 high fall risk, total score 19-24 medium fall risk, total score 25-28 low fall risk.
before treatment, at the end of treatment and 6, 12 and 24 months after the end of treatment
Secondary Outcomes (2)
difference in gait performance among virtual reality games arm, robotic treadmill arm and control arm
before treatment, at the end of treatment and 6, 12 and 24 months after the end of treatment
difference in fear of falling among virtual reality games arm, robotic treadmill arm and control arm
before treatment, at the end of treatment and 6, 12 and 24 months after the end of treatment
Study Arms (3)
control arm
ACTIVE COMPARATORTen traditional treatment sessions divided into 2 training sessions per week for 5 weeks
virtual reality games arm
EXPERIMENTALTen technological treatment sessions divided into 2 training sessions per week for 5 weeks
robotic treadmill arm
EXPERIMENTALTen technological treatment sessions divided into 2 training sessions per week for 5 weeks
Interventions
Each session will include 50 minutes of traditional physical rehabilitation therapy
Each session will include 30 minutes of traditional physical rehabilitation therapy followed by 20 minutes of robotic Tymo system (Tyromotion, Austria), a wireless static and dynamic platform, for evaluating and rehabilitating posture.
Each session will include 30 minutes of traditional physical rehabilitation therapy followed by 20 minutes of robotic Walker View (TecnoBody, Italy) a treadmill equipped with a sensorized belt with eight load cells and a 3D camera
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Hoen and Yahr scale: 1-3 stage
- FAC ≤ 2
- Ranking scale score ≤ 3
- Stability of drug treatment for at least 1 month
- Geriatric Depression Scale 5-items: negative
You may not qualify if:
- Concomitant participation in other studies
- Lack of written informed consent
- Clinical dementia rating (CDR) score ≥ 3
- History of syncopal episodes, epilepsy and vertigo not controlled pharmacologically
- Serious dysfunction of the autonomic system
- Severe behavioral syndromes not compensated by drugs
- Concurrent neurological diseases
- Severe systemic diseases with life expectancy \< 1 year
- Patients unable to follow up.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
IRCCS INRCA Hospital
Ancona, 60131, Italy
IRCCS INRCA Hospital
Fermo, Italy
Related Publications (2)
Maranesi E, Casoni E, Baldoni R, Barboni I, Rinaldi N, Tramontana B, Amabili G, Benadduci M, Barbarossa F, Luzi R, Di Donna V, Scendoni P, Pelliccioni G, Lattanzio F, Riccardi GR, Bevilacqua R. The Effect of Non-Immersive Virtual Reality Exergames versus Traditional Physiotherapy in Parkinson's Disease Older Patients: Preliminary Results from a Randomized-Controlled Trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 10;19(22):14818. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192214818.
PMID: 36429537DERIVEDBevilacqua R, Maranesi E, Di Rosa M, Luzi R, Casoni E, Rinaldi N, Baldoni R, Lattanzio F, Di Donna V, Pelliccioni G, Riccardi GR. Rehabilitation of older people with Parkinson's disease: an innovative protocol for RCT study to evaluate the potential of robotic-based technologies. BMC Neurol. 2020 May 13;20(1):186. doi: 10.1186/s12883-020-01759-4.
PMID: 32404132DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 10, 2019
First Posted
September 12, 2019
Study Start
December 3, 2019
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Last Updated
October 23, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share