Self-Collection of the Pap Smear as Agency: A Novel Way to Improve Refractory Low Cervical Cancer Screening Rates in Rural Alabama
Pap
1 other identifier
interventional
250
1 country
3
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to find out if a self-administered (by the patient) Papanicolaou (Pap) smear is as accurate as a traditional Pap smear administered by a healthcare provider.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2021
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 16, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 18, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 26, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2027
March 31, 2026
March 1, 2026
5.7 years
September 16, 2019
March 25, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Evaluate the self-PAP against the traditional Pap smear procedure
Baseline through 14 days
Study Arms (2)
Self-PAP
EXPERIMENTALEach patient will participate in both arms of the study on the day of the clinical examination. This arm includes the self-administered Papanicolaou (Pap) smear. They will be compared to each other for congruence and accuracy.
Traditional Pap
EXPERIMENTALEach patient will participate in both arms of the study on the day of the clinical examination. This arm includes the traditional, healthcare provider obtained Papanicolaou (Pap) smear specimen. They will be compared to each other for congruence and accuracy.
Interventions
A single cohort of 250 patients will be recruited from among those who need a Papanicolaou (Pap) smear for routine cervical cancer screening, to perform a self-administered Pap smear immediately prior to the traditional Pap smear. Blinded assessment of both tests will be then conducted.
A single cohort of 250 patients will be recruited from among those who need a Papanicolaou (Pap) smear for routine cervical cancer screening, to perform a self-administered Pap smear immediately prior to the traditional Pap smear. Blinded assessment of both tests will be then conducted.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Female of at least 21 years of age and not over 65 presenting who need routine cervical cancer screening per national guidelines.
You may not qualify if:
- prior history of cervical cancer or a positive Pap smear, have had a total hysterectomy (removal of uterus and cervix), or currently enrolled in any other cancer prevention study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Alabama at Birminghamlead
- Cahaba Medical Care Foundationcollaborator
- Laboratory Corporation of Americacollaborator
Study Sites (3)
Cahaba Medical Care - West End
Birmingham, Alabama, 35211, United States
Cahaba Medical Care - Ensley
Birmingham, Alabama, 35218, United States
Cahaba Medical Care
Centreville, Alabama, 35042, United States
Related Publications (9)
Chen K, Ouyang Y, Hillemanns P, Jentschke M. Excellent analytical and clinical performance of a dry self-sampling device for human papillomavirus detection in an urban Chinese referral population. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2016 Dec;42(12):1839-1845. doi: 10.1111/jog.13132. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
PMID: 27647799BACKGROUNDDe Alba I, Anton-Culver H, Hubbell FA, Ziogas A, Hess JR, Bracho A, Arias C, Manetta A. Self-sampling for human papillomavirus in a community setting: feasibility in Hispanic women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008 Aug;17(8):2163-8. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2935.
PMID: 18708409BACKGROUNDChang CC, Tseng CJ, Liu WW, Jain S, Horng SG, Soong YK, Hsueh S, Pao CC. Clinical evaluation of a new model of self-obtained method for the assessment of genital human papilloma virus infection in an underserved population. Chang Gung Med J. 2002 Oct;25(10):664-71.
PMID: 12518778BACKGROUNDHaguenoer K, Sengchanh S, Gaudy-Graffin C, Boyard J, Fontenay R, Marret H, Goudeau A, Pigneaux de Laroche N, Rusch E, Giraudeau B. Vaginal self-sampling is a cost-effective way to increase participation in a cervical cancer screening programme: a randomised trial. Br J Cancer. 2014 Nov 25;111(11):2187-96. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.510. Epub 2014 Sep 23.
PMID: 25247320BACKGROUNDJahic M, Jahic E. Diagnostic Approach to Patients with Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance Cytologic Findings on Cervix. Med Arch. 2016 Jul 27;70(4):296-298. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2016.70.296-298.
PMID: 27703293BACKGROUNDKobetz E, Seay J, Amofah A, Pierre L, Bispo JB, Trevil D, Gonzalez M, Poitevien M, Koru-Sengul T, Carrasquillo O. Mailed HPV self-sampling for cervical cancer screening among underserved minority women: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2017 Jan 13;18(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1721-6.
PMID: 28086983BACKGROUNDWright TC Jr, Denny L, Kuhn L, Pollack A, Lorincz A. HPV DNA testing of self-collected vaginal samples compared with cytologic screening to detect cervical cancer. JAMA. 2000 Jan 5;283(1):81-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.1.81.
PMID: 10632284BACKGROUNDLabani S, Asthana S. Human papillomavirus viral load on careHPV testing of self-collected vaginal samples vs. clinician-collected cervical samples. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Oct;181:233-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.08.005. Epub 2014 Aug 13.
PMID: 25171269BACKGROUNDOgilvie GS, van Niekerk D, Krajden M, Smith LW, Cook D, Gondara L, Ceballos K, Quinlan D, Lee M, Martin RE, Gentile L, Peacock S, Stuart GCE, Franco EL, Coldman AJ. Effect of Screening With Primary Cervical HPV Testing vs Cytology Testing on High-grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia at 48 Months: The HPV FOCAL Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2018 Jul 3;320(1):43-52. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.7464.
PMID: 29971397BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
John B Waits, MD
PI
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Pathologist (outcomes assessor) will be blinded
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 16, 2019
First Posted
September 18, 2019
Study Start
April 26, 2021
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2027
Last Updated
March 31, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share