Smart Watch iECG for the Detection of Cardiac Arrhythmias
Feasibility and Reliability of Smart Watch iECG for the Detection of Cardiac Arrhythmias (The Leipzig Apple Heart Rhythm Study)
Feasibility and Reliability of Smart Watch iECG for the Detection of Cardiac Arrhythmias (The Leipzig Apple Heart Rhythm Study)
Sponsor study identifier
observational
500
1 country
1
Study Start
September 30, 2019
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
July 30, 2021
Actual (reported)Study Completion
July 30, 2021
Actual (reported)This study aims to assess the feasibility and reliability of smart watch iECG provided by the Apple Watch/Apple iPhone for the detection of different cardiac arrhythmias. In this study, results from a 12-lead ECG will be set as the gold standard for the arrhythmia diagnosis, and results from the smart watch iECG (Apple watch/Apple iPhone application and Cardiologist's interpretations) as the index tests. The iECG tracings will be recorded simultaneously, starting and ending at the same time as the standard 12-lead ECG, using the built-in sensors of a smart watch (Apple Watch Series 4) with the ECG application.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
July 30, 2021
Actual (reported)Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
September 16, 2019
Actual (reported)September 17, 2019
Actual (reported)September 30, 2019
Actual (reported)July 30, 2021
Actual (reported)July 30, 2021
Actual (reported)Level of agreement between the cardiologist's interpretations of the 12-lead ECG and the ECG App interpretation results
Baseline
Level of agreement between the cardiologist's interpretations of the 12-lead ECG and iECG
Baseline
Level of agreement between the cardiologist's interpretations of the iECG and the ECG App interpretation results
Baseline
Proportion of participants that remain in arrhythmia diagnosis, from the positive diagnosis from the iECG to the performed 12-lead ECG
Baseline
Proportion of interpretable and non-interpretable iECGs
Baseline
Sensitivity and specificity of screening tests for cardiac arrhythmias identification using: cardiologists interpretation of iECG (index test) and 12-lead ECGs (reference test)
Baseline
Sensitivity and specificity of screening tests for cardiac arrhythmias identification using: ECG App interpretation results (index test) and 12-lead ECGs (reference test)
Baseline
iECG + 12-lead ECG recording in patients suspected with any type of cardiac arrhythmias at the time of recruitment
iECG tracings will be recorded simultaneously, starting and ending at the same time as the standard 12-lead ECG, using the built-in sensors of a smart watch (Apple Watch Series 4) with the ECG application
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
All individuals who had been admitted to the Department of Electrophysiology, Leipzig Heart Center
Andreas Bollmann
Leipzig, 04289, Germany
Behzadi A, Sepehri Shamloo A, Mouratis K, Hindricks G, Arya A, Bollmann A. Feasibility and Reliability of SmartWatch to Obtain 3-Lead Electrocardiogram Recordings. Sensors (Basel). 2020 Sep 7;20(18):5074. doi: 10.3390/s20185074.
Andreas Bollmann, MD, PhD
Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Leipzig Heart Institute, Germany
500 participants (actual enrollment reported by the registry).
First Submitted
September 16, 2019
First Posted
September 17, 2019
Study Start
September 30, 2019
Actual (reported)Machine Learning in Atrial Fibrillation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Primary Completion
July 30, 2021
Actual (reported)Study Completion
July 30, 2021
Actual (reported)Last Updated
October 8, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-10
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: