NCT03256812

Brief Summary

To compare the efficacy and stability of an ICT-based centralized clinical trial monitoring system against the efficacy and stability of an existing outpatient-based electrocardiogram (ECG) and Holter monitoring system for arrhythmia detection after atrial fibrillation ablation, and to test whether such continuous monitoring can better detect arrhythmia that is undetectable by existing methods and how this may affect treatment outcomes

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2017

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2017

Completed
6 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 16, 2017

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 22, 2017

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 31, 2018

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

October 18, 2023

Status Verified

March 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

August 16, 2017

Last Update Submit

October 17, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Arrhythmias, Atrial Fibrillation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The difference in arrhythmia detection rate

    The difference in arrhythmia detection rate between Holter monitoring and ICT-based centralized monitoring

    12 months

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • The difference in the number of hospital visits

    12 months

  • The difference in the recurrence rate of atrial fibrillation or atrial tachycardia

    12 months

Study Arms (2)

ICT-based ECG monitoring group

EXPERIMENTAL

Continuous monitoring with ICT-based ECG monitoring will begin from the time of participation in the trial in the ICT-based monitoring group. Depending on the lifestyle pattern of the patient, the specific time will be set to allow 30 min of monitoring per day, even if there are no symptoms. If symptoms do appear, additional monitoring will be performed for at least 10 more minutes. 24-hr Holter monitoring will be implemented at the 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups in this group, as in the Holter monitoring group.

Device: ICT-based ECG monitoring

Holter monitoring group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

24-hr Holter monitoring will be implemented at the 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups in the Holter monitoring group

Device: Holter monitoring

Interventions

Continuous monitoring will begin from the time of participation in the trial in the ICT-based centralized monitoring group. 24-hr Holter monitoring will be implemented at the 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups in this group, as in the Holter monitoring group. If heart rate drops below 40 beats/min or increases above 120 beats/min on ECG during ICT-based ECG home monitoring, the participant will be notified first through an alarm function.

ICT-based ECG monitoring group

24-hr Holter monitoring will be implemented at the 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups

Holter monitoring group

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age ≥ 20 years, but \< 80 years
  • Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation
  • Patients with sustained atrial fibrillation despite ≥ 6 weeks of continuous antiarrhythmia therapy or those who underwent an ablation procedure for tachy-bradycardia syndrome within the previous week
  • Patients who can be followed-up for at least 3 months after ablation
  • Patients who can use and consent to use smartphone-based ECG monitoring
  • Patients who can use a smartphone (Android, version 5.0 or lower; development planned for version 6.0 or higher)
  • Those who can connect to the internet via LAN or WiFi and are in an environment where they can use a gateway and smartphone.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients who cannot be monitored by a smartphone or Bluetooth device
  • Patients who cannot use a smartphone, Bluetooth device, or the internet due to old age
  • Patients with contraindications to standard therapy, such as continued anticoagulant therapy before and after atrial fibrillation ablation
  • Patients belonging to a population vulnerable to clinical trials

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center

Daegu, 700-712, South Korea

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Arrhythmias, CardiacAtrial Fibrillation

Interventions

Electrocardiography, Ambulatory

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Heart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ElectrocardiographyHeart Function TestsDiagnostic Techniques, CardiovascularDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisElectrodiagnosisMonitoring, AmbulatoryMonitoring, Physiologic

Study Officials

  • Hyoung-Seob Park, MD

    Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 16, 2017

First Posted

August 22, 2017

Study Start

March 1, 2017

Primary Completion

August 31, 2018

Study Completion

December 31, 2018

Last Updated

October 18, 2023

Record last verified: 2019-03

Locations