CHARISMA Expansion Study
CHARISMA
Community Health Clinic Model for Agency in Relationships and Safer Microbicide Adherence (CHARISMA) Expansion Study
1 other identifier
interventional
407
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The CHARISMA Expansion Study is a two-arm, randomized (1:1), controlled study of a behavioral intervention-the Community Health clinic model for Agency in Relationships and Safer Microbicide Adherence (CHARISMA)-to reduce social harms (SHs) and intimate partner violence (IPV), increase healthy relationship dynamics and oral PrEP (pre-exposure prophylaxis) TDF/FTC (tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine), hereafter called PrEP, adherence among enrolled women. This study is an expansion of the CHARISMA intervention pilot study which was appended to the Microbicide Trials Network (MTN)-025 HOPE (HIV Open Label Prevention Extension) study. CHARISMA is defined by the use of a tool, called the CHARISMA HEAlthy Relationship Assessment Tool (HEART) used in combination with three counselling modules:
- Module A: General Partner Communication and Relationship Skills
- Module B: Partner Disclosure and Communication around PrEP Use
- Module C: Responding to Intimate Partner Violence and Safety Planning
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 15, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 28, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 17, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 25, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 25, 2020
CompletedJanuary 23, 2023
January 1, 2023
1.6 years
May 28, 2019
January 20, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (10)
PrEP adherence/persistence by measurement
Adherence will be ascertained through measurement of TFV-DP (tenofovir-diphosphate) in dried blood spot (DBS) specimens. DBS collected via blood draw at Month 3 and 6 follow-up visits will be used for retrospective PCR testing for tenofovir levels (although DBS is collected at Enrollment and Month 1 as well).
3 months
PrEP adherence/persistence by measurement
Adherence will be ascertained through measurement of TFV-DP in DBS specimens. DBS collected via blood draw at Month 3 and 6 follow-up visits will be used for retrospective PCR testing for tenofovir levels (although DBS is collected at Enrollment and Month 1 as well).
6 months
PrEP adherence/persistence by self-report
Self-reported data on PrEP adherence will be collected via standardized questionnaires to better understand patterns of PrEP use and reasons for poor adherence or discontinuation. The tool used for the assessment is the WHO Violence Against Women Survey (VAWS). VAWS consists of behavior-specific items related to psychological (four items), physical (six items) and sexual violence (three items). The physical violence items are further divided into 'moderate' (the two first items) and 'severe' (the following four items) violence based on the likelihood of physical injury. Values are considered worse as responses to experiences of violence increase from no=0, to one=1, few=2, and many=3 times.
3 months
PrEP adherence/persistence by self-report
Self-reported data on PrEP adherence will be collected via standardized questionnaires to better understand patterns of PrEP use and reasons for poor adherence or discontinuation. The tool used for the assessment is the WHO VAWS. VAWS consists of behavior-specific items related to psychological (four items), physical (six items) and sexual violence (three items). The physical violence items are further divided into 'moderate' (the two first items) and 'severe' (the following four items) violence based on the likelihood of physical injury. Values are considered worse as responses to experiences of violence increase from no=0, to one=1, few=2, and many=3 times.
6 months
Incidence of social harms (SHs) using a SHs questionnaire
SH in this study could include negative consequences related to study participation, PrEP use disclosure, stigma, gender-based violence, and relationship problems. Participants will be screened for SH resulting from product use or study participation at Enrollment, Month 3, and Month 6, and may report a social harm to staff at any time during the study.
Anytime during the study, up to 6 months
IPV: Self-report of a) any IPV or b) physical or sexual IPV during study participation.
All participants will receive SOC IPV screening at enrollment and at the Month 3 and Month 6 visits and may report IPV to staff at any time during the study. SOC IPV screening will include clinical screening with a validated IPV measurement tool-the WHO VAWS. The WHO considers the VAWS to be a valid and reliable measure of GBV (gender-based violence) and is therefore a reasonable SOC screening tool for this study.
Anytime during the study, up to 6 months
Percent of participants who disclosed PrEP product use to a partner, which is reported via a questionnaire
Consistent with the primary objective to determine the effect of CHARISMA on participants' relationship dynamics, the following endpoints will be assessed: * Disclosure of PrEP use to male partners: Self-report that participants have told their partners that they are using PrEP * Male partner support for product use: Self-report that male partners support or accept (i.e. do not oppose) their PrEP use * Communication with male partners: Self-report of partnership communication dynamics. All participants will be asked about relationship dynamics, including disclosure of PrEP use, support for product use, and communication during enrollment, month 3, and 6 follow-up visits, and as needed during month 1 visits.
Enrollment
Percent of participants who disclosed PrEP product use to a partner, which is reported via a questionnaire
Consistent with the primary objective to determine the effect of CHARISMA on participants' relationship dynamics, the following endpoints will be assessed: * Disclosure of PrEP use to male partners: Self-report that participants have told their partners that they are using PrEP * Male partner support for product use: Self-report that male partners support or accept (i.e. do not oppose) their PrEP use * Communication with male partners: Self-report of partnership communication dynamics All participants will be asked about relationship dynamics, including disclosure of PrEP use, support for product use, and communication during enrollment, month 3, and 6 follow-up visits, and as needed during month 1 visits.
1 month
Percent of participants who disclosed PrEP product use to a partner, which is reported via a questionnaire
Consistent with the primary objective to determine the effect of CHARISMA on participants' relationship dynamics, the following endpoints will be assessed: * Disclosure of PrEP use to male partners: Self-report that participants have told their partners that they are using PrEP * Male partner support for product use: Self-report that male partners support or accept (i.e. do not oppose) their PrEP use * Communication with male partners: Self-report of partnership communication dynamics All participants will be asked about relationship dynamics, including disclosure of PrEP use, support for product use, and communication during enrollment, month 3, and 6 follow-up visits, and as needed during month 1 visits.
3 months
Percent of participants who disclosed PrEP product use to a partner, which is reported via a questionnaire
Consistent with the primary objective to determine the effect of CHARISMA on participants' relationship dynamics, the following endpoints will be assessed: * Disclosure of PrEP use to male partners: Self-report that participants have told their partners that they are using PrEP * Male partner support for product use: Self-report that male partners support or accept (i.e. do not oppose) their PrEP use * Communication with male partners: Self-report of partnership communication dynamics All participants will be asked about relationship dynamics, including disclosure of PrEP use, support for product use, and communication during enrollment, month 3, and 6 follow-up visits, and as needed during month 1 visits.
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Acceptability and feasibility assessed by intervention tool utilization as reported in response to a questionnaire".-
6 months
Acceptability and feasibility assessed by participants' accounts of utilizing the CHARISMA intervention, as reported during an interview.
6 months
Acceptability and feasibility assessed by participants' accounts of utilizing the CHARISMA intervention, as reported during an interview.
9 months
Feasibility of the CHARISMA intervention - Time to completion
Anytime during the study, up to 6 months
Percentage of participants who complete the intervention as outlined by the protocol, assessed via case report forms
Anytime during the study, up to 6 months
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Control
OTHERReceives Standard of Care (SOC) services established in accordance with the South African Department of Health (DoH) PrEP (Pre-exposure Prophylaxis) guidelines.
CHARISMA Intervention
EXPERIMENTALReceives SOC (Standard of care) per control arm plus provider-administration of HEART (HEAlthy Relationship Assessment Tool) and provider-administration of CHARISMA (the Community Health clinic model for Agency in Relationships and Safer Microbicide Adherence) counseling modules, as applicable: * Module A: General Partner Communication and Relationship Skills * Module B: Partner Disclosure and Communication around PrEP Use * Module C: Responding to Intimate Partner Violence and Safety Planning
Interventions
Standard of care (SOC) HIV prevention services in line with the South African DoH (Department of Health) PrEP (Pre-exposure Prophylaxis) rollout program that include daily oral TDF/FTC (tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine). In addition, risk reduction counseling, IPV (Intimate Partner Violence) screening using the VAWS (WHO Violence Against Women Survey) with referrals for counseling, medical care, or shelter assistance, among other care options, if needed and an informational packet regarding HIV prevention services for themselves and male partners will be offered
SOC (Standard of Care) per control arm plus provider-administration of HEART and provider-administration of CHARISMA counseling modules, as applicable: * Module A: General Partner Communication and Relationship Skills * Module B: Partner Disclosure and Communication around PrEP Use * Module C: Responding to Intimate Partner Violence and Safety Planning
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Able and willing to provide written informed consent and locator information
- Reports having a current male primary partner,
- Sexually active, defined by vaginal intercourse with a male at least 4 times per month in the past 3 months and plan to be sexually active during the study duration
- Not pregnant (defined by urine pregnancy testing) and not breastfeeding
- Not planning on becoming pregnant in the next 6 months
- English or Zulu speaking
- HIV negative based on negative HIV rapid tests, at the time of enrollment
You may not qualify if:
- Previously participated in a clinical trial or a longitudinal HIV prevention research study
- Unwilling to use daily oral PrEP
- Has any significant medical condition or other condition that, in the opinion of the Principal Investigator (PI)/designee, would preclude informed consent, make study participation unsafe, complicate interpretation of study outcome data, or otherwise interfere with achieving the study objectives.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- RTI Internationallead
- Wits Reproductive Health and HIV Institutecollaborator
- FHI 360collaborator
- United States Agency for International Development (USAID)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Wits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute (Wits RHI)
Johannesburg, 2001, South Africa
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Elizabeth Montgomery, PhD, MHS
RTI International
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Thesla Palanee, MMedSci,PhD,MSc
Wits RHI
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 28, 2019
First Posted
September 17, 2019
Study Start
October 15, 2018
Primary Completion
May 25, 2020
Study Completion
May 25, 2020
Last Updated
January 23, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share