NCT04091568

Brief Summary

The aim of this observational study is to explore and compare patients' experiences of asleep and awake fibreoptic intubation using a semi qualitative patient questionnaire. In particular, investigators will investigate the occurrence of negative experiences, such as distress and discomfort.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
130

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2019

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 13, 2019

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 17, 2019

Completed
23 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 10, 2019

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 6, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 6, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

May 5, 2021

Status Verified

May 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

September 13, 2019

Last Update Submit

May 4, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

Awake fibre-optic tracheal intubationAsleep fibre-optic tracheal intubationPatient experience

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • To assess the incidence and severity of distress experienced by patients during awake and asleep fibreoptic intubation.

    Participants will be asked to rate the discomfort during the procedure on a Visual Analogue Score (0-10). There will also be space for patients to write comments explaining their score. These comments will then be used for content analysis, for example to explore different aspects of the procedure that caused distress.

    6 - 12 months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Secondary endpoints include the differences in occurrence of patient discomfort, pain and difficulty breathing.

    6 - 12 months

Study Arms (2)

Awake fibre-optic intubation

Awake fibre-optic intubation

Asleep fibre-optic intubation

Asleep fibre-optic intubation

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Those patients who undergo either awake or asleep fibreoptic intubation in the Head and Neck Theatres at both UHCW and Oxford University Hospitals Foundation Trust, as decided by their responsible anaesthetist.

You may qualify if:

  • All patients aged 18 years and above
  • Patients who underwent head and neck or dental surgery and required awake or asleep fibreoptic intubation
  • Patients who underwent elective surgery
  • Are able and willing to provide written informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients who do not consent to be part of the study
  • Patients below 18 years old If a translator is not available at the time, participants who cannot reasonably read and communicate in English
  • Those who did not undergo awake or asleep fibreoptic intubation
  • Those who underwent emergency surgery

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust

Coventry, West Midlands, CV2 2DX, United Kingdom

Location

Oxford University Hospitals

Oxford, OX3 7LE, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (12)

  • Frerk C, Mitchell VS, McNarry AF, Mendonca C, Bhagrath R, Patel A, O'Sullivan EP, Woodall NM, Ahmad I; Difficult Airway Society intubation guidelines working group. Difficult Airway Society 2015 guidelines for management of unanticipated difficult intubation in adults. Br J Anaesth. 2015 Dec;115(6):827-48. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev371. Epub 2015 Nov 10.

    PMID: 26556848BACKGROUND
  • Cook TM, Woodall N, Frerk C; Fourth National Audit Project. Major complications of airway management in the UK: results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 1: anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2011 May;106(5):617-31. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer058. Epub 2011 Mar 29.

    PMID: 21447488BACKGROUND
  • Allan AG. Reluctance of anaesthetists to perform awake intubation. Anaesthesia. 2004 Apr;59(4):413. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2004.03729.x. No abstract available.

    PMID: 15023129BACKGROUND
  • Patil V, Barker GL, Harwood RJ, Woodall NM. Training course in local anaesthesia of the airway and fibreoptic intubation using course delegates as subjects. Br J Anaesth. 2002 Oct;89(4):586-93. doi: 10.1093/bja/aef226.

    PMID: 12393360BACKGROUND
  • Wanderer JP, Ehrenfeld JM, Sandberg WS, Epstein RH. The changing scope of difficult airway management. Can J Anaesth. 2013 Oct;60(10):1022-4. doi: 10.1007/s12630-013-9999-2. Epub 2013 Jul 30. No abstract available.

    PMID: 23897492BACKGROUND
  • Wiles MD, McCahon RA, Armstrong JAM. Fibreoptic intubation rates in a UK teaching hospital. Proceedings of the Anaesthetic Research Society Meeting. Br J Anaesth 2010; 105 (5): 729P

    BACKGROUND
  • Heidegger T, Gerig HJ, Ulrich B, Kreienbuhl G. Validation of a simple algorithm for tracheal intubation: daily practice is the key to success in emergencies--an analysis of 13,248 intubations. Anesth Analg. 2001 Feb;92(2):517-22. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200102000-00044.

    PMID: 11159261BACKGROUND
  • McNarry AF, Dovell T, Dancey FM, Pead ME. Perception of training needs and opportunities in advanced airway skills: a survey of British and Irish trainees. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2007 Jun;24(6):498-504. doi: 10.1017/S0265021506002031. Epub 2007 Jan 8.

    PMID: 17207298BACKGROUND
  • El-Boghdadly K, Onwochei DN, Cuddihy J, Ahmad I. A prospective cohort study of awake fibreoptic intubation practice at a tertiary centre. Anaesthesia. 2017 Jun;72(6):694-703. doi: 10.1111/anae.13844.

    PMID: 28654138BACKGROUND
  • Mavridou P, Dimitriou V, Manataki A, Arnaoutoglou E, Papadopoulos G. Patient's anxiety and fear of anesthesia: effect of gender, age, education, and previous experience of anesthesia. A survey of 400 patients. J Anesth. 2013 Feb;27(1):104-8. doi: 10.1007/s00540-012-1460-0. Epub 2012 Aug 3.

    PMID: 22864564BACKGROUND
  • Schnack DT, Kristensen MS, Rasmussen LS. Patients' experience of awake versus anaesthetised orotracheal intubation: a controlled study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011 Jun;28(6):438-42. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e328343222d.

    PMID: 21544021BACKGROUND
  • Knudsen K, Nilsson U, Hogman M, Poder U. Awake intubation creates feelings of being in a vulnerable situation but cared for in safe hands: a qualitative study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2016 Aug 30;16(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12871-016-0240-z.

    PMID: 27576876BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Ceri Jones

    University Hospitals of Coventry and Warwickshire

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Cyprian Mendonca, MD,FRCA

    University Hospitals of Coventry and Warwickshire

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 13, 2019

First Posted

September 17, 2019

Study Start

October 10, 2019

Primary Completion

November 6, 2020

Study Completion

November 6, 2020

Last Updated

May 5, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

IPD will be a written questionnaire which is anonymous

Locations