Orotracheal Intubation Using Flexible Fibro Bronchoscope With vs Without Supraglottic Device
1 other identifier
interventional
41
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Randomized clinical trial conducted in pediatric simulators that wishes to compare the success of fiberoptic tracheal intubation using supraglottic device AuraGain compared with fiberoptic tracheal intubation without laryngeal mask, performed by anesthesiologists and anesthesiology residents.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2020
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 5, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 22, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 15, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 15, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 15, 2021
CompletedMay 5, 2021
May 1, 2021
6 months
February 5, 2020
May 3, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Successful intubation at the first attempt using fiber optic through laryngeal mask AuraGain compared to fiberoptic intubation without laryngeal mask
Incidence of successful tracheal intubation at the first attempt using fiberoptic through laryngeal mask AuraGain and without laryngeal mask. After this procedure, tracheal intubation with positive pressure ventilation in the pediatric simulators will be verified.
immediately after intubation
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Time required to achieve tracheal intubation using fiber optic through laryngeal mask AuraGain compared to fiberoptic intubation without laryngeal mask
immediately after intubation
Successful intubation at the second and third attempts using fiber optic through laryngeal mask AuraGain compared to fiberoptic intubation without laryngeal mask
immediately after intubation
Global success of orotracheal intubation using fiber optic through laryngeal mask AuraGain compared to fiberoptic intubation without laryngeal mask
immediately after intubation
Accidental extubation at the time of removing the bronchoscope and/or the laryngeal mask.
immediately after intubation
Ease of tracheal intubation
immediately after intubation
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Fiberoptic intubation using laryngeal mask AuraGain
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants should perform an fiberoptic tracheal intubation through the AuraGain laryngeal mask, in a pediatric simulator. Will be evaluated the success rate at the first attempt and other secondary outcomes
Fiberoptic intubation without laryngeal mask
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants should perform an fiberoptic tracheal intubation without laryngeal mask, in a pediatric simulator. Will be evaluated the success rate at the first attempt and other secondary outcomes
Interventions
Participants should perform an fiberoptic tracheal intubation through the AuraGain laryngeal mask, in a pediatric simulator.
Participants should perform an fiberoptic tracheal intubation without laryngeal mask, in a pediatric simulator.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Anesthesiologists or anesthesiology residents
- Perform a training in fiber optic tracheal intubation whit and without supraglottic device in simulators. The CUSUM learning curve will be used to achieve a success rate greater than 80% at the first attempt.
- Accept to participate in the study and sign the informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Mario Andres Zamudio
Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia
Antioquia´s University
Medellín, Colombia
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mario A Zamudio, Professor
Universidad de Antioquia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 5, 2020
First Posted
April 22, 2020
Study Start
September 15, 2020
Primary Completion
March 15, 2021
Study Completion
March 15, 2021
Last Updated
May 5, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- 5 years
- Access Criteria
- Formal application and authorization of the University of Antioquia
The data will be stored for future research in the database of the GRIMPA perioperative medicine research group