Retroflexion In The Ascending Colon Is A Costless Endoscopic Maneuver Increasing Adenoma Detection Rate
1 other identifier
observational
655
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Missing polyps during colonoscopy is considered an important factor for interval cancer appearance especially in the ascending colon (AC). Aim of the study: To evaluate the contribution of retroflexion to adenoma detection in the AC. Patients-Methods: Prospective observational study included consecutive patients with complete colonoscopy between June 2017 and June 2018. The AC was examined in two phases. The first phase included two forward views from the hepatic flexure to the cecum and the second phase a retroflexion in the cecum, inspection till the hepatic flexure then redressing to forward view and reinsertion to the cecum.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jun 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 10, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 12, 2019
CompletedSeptember 13, 2019
September 1, 2019
1.1 years
September 10, 2019
September 11, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Adenoma Miss Rate
adenoma miss rate by performing systematically a retroflexion after a second forward view in the ascending colon and evaluate the additional gain in adenoma detection
June 2017-June 2018
Increase in Adenoma Detection Rate in the ascending Colon
adenoma miss rate by performing systematically a retroflexion after a second forward view in the ascending colon and evaluate the additional gain in adenoma detection
June 2017-June 2018
Study Arms (1)
Consecutive Patients with complete colonoscopy
Inclusion criteria were as follows: Patients older than 18 years, with a complete colonoscopy, for CRC screening or post-polypectomy surveillance or diagnostic assessment. Exclusion criteria precluded patients with previous colectomy or an abdominal surgery in the last 6 months, patients with polyposis syndromes or inflammatory bowel diseases and if they were unfit for polypectomy or the polyp specimen was not retrieved for histology.
Interventions
Prospective evaluation of an every day technique (retroflexion) used in our department for many years. The protocol of ascending colon examination encompassed 2 phases: A first phase (1) divided in Forward view (1a) videlicet insertion from the right flexure to the caecum followed by a second forward view (1b) namely withdrawal till the right flexure and reinsertion to the caecum maintaining the endoscope straight and a second phase (2, Retroflexion) with U-turn of the colonoscope in the caecum till the right flexure and then redressing to the forward view and reinsertion to the caecum.
Eligibility Criteria
consecutive patients intended for complete colonoscopy in Alexandra University Hospital, Athens, Greece for a predetermined period (June 2017-June 2018) were prospectively evaluated for polyp detection in the ascending colon
You may qualify if:
- Patients older than 18 years
- Patients with a complete colonoscopy
- Patients with indication for colonoscopy of CRC screening, post-polypectomy surveillance or diagnostic assessment
You may not qualify if:
- patients with previous colectomy or an abdominal surgery in the last 6 months
- patients with polyposis syndromes
- patients inflammatory bowel diseases
- patients unfit for polypectomy
- if the polyp specimen was not retrieved for histology
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Alexandra General Hospital
Athens, 11528, Greece
Related Publications (7)
Desai M, Bilal M, Hamade N, Gorrepati VS, Thoguluva Chandrasekar V, Jegadeesan R, Gupta N, Bhandari P, Repici A, Hassan C, Sharma P. Increasing adenoma detection rates in the right side of the colon comparing retroflexion with a second forward view: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Mar;89(3):453-459.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.09.006. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
PMID: 30222971BACKGROUNDTriantafyllou K, Tziatzios G, Sioulas AD, Beintaris I, Gouloumi AR, Panayiotides IG, Dimitriadis GD. Diagnostic yield of scope retroflexion in the right colon: A prospective cohort study. Dig Liver Dis. 2016 Feb;48(2):176-81. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2015.11.024. Epub 2015 Dec 2.
PMID: 26748425BACKGROUNDKim HU, Boo SJ, Na SY, Song HJ. [Additional polyp detection rate using colonoscopic retroflexion in right colon]. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2015 Feb;65(2):90-8. doi: 10.4166/kjg.2015.65.2.90. Korean.
PMID: 25716711BACKGROUNDHewett DG, Rex DK. Miss rate of right-sided colon examination during colonoscopy defined by retroflexion: an observational study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Aug;74(2):246-52. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.04.005. Epub 2011 Jun 15.
PMID: 21679946BACKGROUNDHarrison M, Singh N, Rex DK. Impact of proximal colon retroflexion on adenoma miss rates. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Mar;99(3):519-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.04070.x.
PMID: 15056095BACKGROUNDChandran S, Parker F, Vaughan R, Mitchell B, Fanning S, Brown G, Yu J, Efthymiou M. Right-sided adenoma detection with retroflexion versus forward-view colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Mar;81(3):608-13. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.08.039. Epub 2014 Oct 29.
PMID: 25440687BACKGROUNDLee HS, Jeon SW, Park HY, Yeo SJ. Improved detection of right colon adenomas with additional retroflexion following two forward-view examinations: a prospective study. Endoscopy. 2017 Apr;49(4):334-341. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-119401. Epub 2016 Dec 8.
PMID: 27931050BACKGROUND
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Head of GI Department, PhD, MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 10, 2019
First Posted
September 12, 2019
Study Start
June 1, 2017
Primary Completion
June 30, 2018
Study Completion
June 30, 2018
Last Updated
September 13, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-09