NCT04083378

Brief Summary

This phase II trial studies how well software-aided imaging works in confirming tumor coverage with ablation (the removal or destruction of a body part or tissue or its function) on patients with liver tumors. The current standard for targeting tumor cells and evaluating the outcome of a liver ablation procedure is a visual inspection of the pre- and post-procedure computed tomography (CT) scans. Software-aided imaging systems, such as Morfeus, may help to improve the accuracy and effectiveness of liver ablation.

Trial Health

75
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
107

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_2

Timeline
6mo left

Started Jan 2020

Longer than P75 for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress93%
Jan 2020Oct 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 5, 2019

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 10, 2019

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 10, 2020

Completed
4.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 31, 2024

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

November 21, 2025

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 31, 2026

Expected
Last Updated

March 23, 2026

Status Verified

March 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

4.8 years

First QC Date

September 5, 2019

Results QC Date

September 11, 2025

Last Update Submit

March 9, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Minimal Ablative Margin Assessment on Post-ablation Intraprocedural CT.

    For control group, MAM was assessed by rigid co-registration with side-by-side juxtaposition to verify applicator placement and by visual landmark-based CT measurements on CT workstation (Siemens Healthineers; Forchheim, Germany). For experimental group, CT images were processed with a software-based method on a radiation treatment planning system (Raystation, RaySearch Laboratories; Stockholm, Sweden) with biomechanical deformable imaging registration coupled with AI-based autosegmentation. For experimental group, interventional radiologist (IR) was informed of ablation applicator position relative to tumor on non-contrast CT before thermal ablation energy delivery and of MAM results (including spatial location of suboptimal margins) generated by software-based assessment, with this information not disclosed to IR in control group. Software-based assessment was used to compare MAMs results between both study groups with a two-sample t-test.

    Visit 2 (baseline/ablation day)

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Cumulative Incidence of 2-year Local Tumor Progression

    Time to local tumor progression (LTP) was measured from ablation to earliest LTP or death (competing event). Follow-up imaging continued up to 24 months.

  • Overall Survival

    Overall survival was measured from the date of ablation to the date of death from any cause. Patients still alive were censored at the date of last clinic visit, with follow-up up to 24 months after ablation.

  • Intrahepatic Progression-free Survival (for the Randomized Group)

    Up to 2 years

  • Extrahepatic Progression-free Survival

    Up to 2 years

Study Arms (2)

Arm I (standard of care ablation)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients undergo standard of care ablation.

Procedure: Ablation TherapyOther: Quality-of-Life AssessmentOther: Questionnaire Administration

Arm II (standard of care ablation, software-aided imaging)

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients undergo standard of care ablation with software-aided imaging (Morfeus).

Procedure: Ablation TherapyProcedure: Image-Guided TherapyOther: Quality-of-Life AssessmentOther: Questionnaire Administration

Interventions

Undergo standard of care ablation

Also known as: ABLATION, Catheter Ablation, Local Ablation Therapy, Local Ablative Therapy
Arm I (standard of care ablation)Arm II (standard of care ablation, software-aided imaging)

Undergo software-aided imaging (Morfeus)

Also known as: Image Guided Therapy, Imaging Guided Therapy
Arm II (standard of care ablation, software-aided imaging)

Ancillary studies

Also known as: Quality of Life Assessment
Arm I (standard of care ablation)Arm II (standard of care ablation, software-aided imaging)

Ancillary studies

Arm I (standard of care ablation)Arm II (standard of care ablation, software-aided imaging)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients presenting with ≤ 3 liver tumors (biopsy-proven or documented by imaging) measuring 1 to 5 cm planned to undergo percutaneous thermal ablation with either microwave or radiofrequency ablation. Patients with more than 3 tumors might also be eligible in case other tumors can be treated with another curative-intended loco-regional therapy (i.e. surgical resection, radiation therapy).
  • Ability to completely cover the target tumor with at least a 5 mm ablation margin.
  • Written informed consent to voluntarily participate in the study and follow-up CT scan schedule
  • Age \> 18 years-old
  • Performance status 0-2 (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Classification \[ECOG\])
  • Target tumor should be visualized on contrast-enhanced CT
  • Adequate glomerular filtration rate

You may not qualify if:

  • Active bacterial infection or fungal infection on the day of the ablation that, in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with safe delivery of the study procedure or with the interpretation of study results.
  • Platelet \< 50,000/mm3.
  • INR \> 1.5
  • Patients with uncorrectable coagulopathy.
  • Currently breastfeeding or pregnant (latter confirmed by serum pregnancy test).
  • Physical or psychological condition which would impair study participation.
  • ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) score of \> 4.
  • Any other loco-regional therapies at the target lesion(s) within 30 days of the ablation procedure.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

M D Anderson Cancer Center

Houston, Texas, 77030, United States

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Siddiqi NS, Albuquerque J, Paolucci I, Lin YM, O'Connor C, Haddad A, Jones AK, Vauthey JN, Brock KK, Odisio BC. Quantifying Functional Liver Volume Loss after CT-guided Percutaneous Thermal Ablation: A COVER-ALL Trial Post Hoc Analysis. Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2026 Mar;8(2):e250385. doi: 10.1148/rycan.250385.

  • Odisio BC, Albuquerque J, Lin YM, Anderson BM, O'Connor CS, Rigaud B, Briones-Dimayuga M, Jones AK, Fellman BM, Huang SY, Kuban J, Metwalli ZA, Sheth R, Habibollahi P, Patel M, Shah KY, Cox VL, Kang HC, Morris VK, Kopetz S, Javle MM, Kaseb A, Tzeng CW, Cao HT, Newhook T, Chun YS, Vauthey JN, Gupta S, Paolucci I, Brock KK. Software-based versus visual assessment of the minimal ablative margin in patients with liver tumours undergoing percutaneous thermal ablation (COVER-ALL): a randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 May;10(5):442-451. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(25)00024-X. Epub 2025 Mar 13.

  • Lin YM, Paolucci I, Anderson BM, O'Connor CS, Rigaud B, Briones-Dimayuga M, Jones KA, Brock KK, Fellman BM, Odisio BC. Study Protocol COVER-ALL: Clinical Impact of a Volumetric Image Method for Confirming Tumour Coverage with Ablation on Patients with Malignant Liver Lesions. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2022 Dec;45(12):1860-1867. doi: 10.1007/s00270-022-03255-3. Epub 2022 Sep 4.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Catheter AblationRadiotherapy, Image-Guided

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Radiofrequency AblationRadiofrequency TherapyTherapeuticsAblation TechniquesSurgical Procedures, OperativeRadiotherapy

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Bruno Odisio
Organization
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

Study Officials

  • BRUNO C ODISIO

    M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 5, 2019

First Posted

September 10, 2019

Study Start

January 10, 2020

Primary Completion

October 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 31, 2026

Last Updated

March 23, 2026

Results First Posted

November 21, 2025

Record last verified: 2026-03

Locations