Better Me Within Trial to Improve Lifestyle Behaviors in African Americans
Reducing Obesity in African American Women Through Lifestyle Enhancement
2 other identifiers
interventional
221
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study describes a community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach to design a novel faith-enhancement to the diabetes prevention program (DPP) for AA women. A long-standing CBPR partnership designed the faith-enhancement from focus group data. The faith components were specifically linked to weekly DPP learning objectives to strategically emphasize behavioral skills with religious principles. Using a CBPR approach, the Better Me Within trial was able to enroll 12 churches, screen 333 AA women, and randomize 221 after collection of objective eligibility measures. A prospective, randomized, nested by church, design was used to evaluate the faith-enhanced DPP as compared to a standard DPP on weight, diabetes and cardiovascular risk, over a 16-week intervention and 10-month follow up.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable obesity
Started Feb 2013
Longer than P75 for not_applicable obesity
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 22, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 31, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 29, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 9, 2019
CompletedDecember 11, 2019
August 1, 2019
4.2 years
August 29, 2019
December 9, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Body weight
Weight (lbs) was collected with a digital scale in light clothing with shoes removed. Weight was collected twice and the average was computed. Height was also measured using the same protocol to calculate the BMI (body-mass index).
Baseline
Body weight
Weight (lbs) was collected with a digital scale in light clothing with shoes removed. Weight was collected twice and the average was computed. Height was also measured using the same protocol to calculate the BMI (body-mass index).
4-month
Body weight
Weight (lbs) was collected with a digital scale in light clothing with shoes removed. Weight was collected twice and the average was computed. Height was also measured using the same protocol to calculate the BMI (body-mass index).
10-month
Waist circumference: Number of participants above the recommended level
Waist circumference was taken at the top of the pelvis (e.g., above the uppermost lateral border of the right ilium) with a measuring tape twice and averaged.
Baseline
Waist circumference: Number of participants above the recommended level
Waist circumference was taken at the top of the pelvis (e.g., above the uppermost lateral border of the right ilium) with a measuring tape twice and averaged.
4-month
Waist circumference: Number of participants above the recommended level
Waist circumference was taken at the top of the pelvis (e.g., above the uppermost lateral border of the right ilium) with a measuring tape twice and averaged.
10-month
Secondary Outcomes (20)
Fasting glucose
Baseline
Fasting glucose
4-month
Glycated Hemoglobin A1c
Baseline
Glycated Hemoglobin A1c
4-month
Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL)
Baseline
- +15 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Faith-enhanced DPP
EXPERIMENTALA total of six churches were randomized to this arm that included 119 participants and received 10-month DPP with faith components.
Standard DPP
ACTIVE COMPARATORA total of five churches were randomized to this arm that included 102 participants who received the standard DPP on the church settings.
Interventions
The faith-enhanced curriculum was faith-based and developed using CBPR approaches. The Faith-DPP condition included delivery of the DPP. The group intervention was delivered by one to two trained peers from the church and consisted of 16 weekly group meetings followed by 6 bi-monthly or monthly maintenance sessions. The faith enhanced curriculum included five strategies: 1) a mini sermon (\~15 min in length) delivered by a pastor (head pastors were required to deliver at least one per month), first lady, or church leader (pastor associate, deacon, elder, etc.), 2) a memory verse, 3) in class or take-home faith activity (application of faith principles), 4) promises to remember, and 5) scripture and prayer integrated into participant curriculum and facilitator materials. These five faith enhancements were developed by the CAB to enhance the DPP's weekly learning objectives, which resulted in faith components specifically linked to each week of DPP content.
The S-DPP condition was faith-placed, a secular program (the DPP) held at an faith-based organization. This condition received the same diabetes prevention program (DPP) as the Faith-DPP, but did not receive any faith enhancements or pastor involvement.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Identify as African-American
- Female
- years of age or older
- Parishioner at enrolled church
- Overweight or obese
- Willingness to participate in a 10-month study.
You may not qualify if:
- Currently attending a weight loss program
- Diagnosed with diabetes
- Medical condition that interfered with physical activity or dietary changes
- Plans to move in the next 10 months.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
UNT Health Science Center
Fort Worth, Texas, 76107, United States
Related Publications (4)
Kitzman H, Dodgen L, Mamun A, Slater JL, King G, Slater D, King A, Mandapati S, DeHaven M. Community-based participatory research to design a faith-enhanced diabetes prevention program: The Better Me Within randomized trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2017 Nov;62:77-90. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2017.08.003. Epub 2017 Aug 12.
PMID: 28807739BACKGROUNDTan M, Mamun A, Kitzman H, Mandapati SR, Dodgen L. Neighborhood Disadvantage and Allostatic Load in African American Women at Risk for Obesity-Related Diseases. Prev Chronic Dis. 2017 Nov 22;14:E119. doi: 10.5888/pcd14.170143.
PMID: 29166248BACKGROUNDKitzman H, Mamun A, Dodgen L, Slater D, King G, King A, Slater JL, DeHaven M. Better Me Within Randomized Trial: Faith-Based Diabetes Prevention Program for Weight Loss in African American Women. Am J Health Promot. 2021 Feb;35(2):202-213. doi: 10.1177/0890117120958545. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
PMID: 32945175DERIVEDMamun A, Kitzman H, Dodgen L. Reducing metabolic syndrome through a community-based lifestyle intervention in African American women. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2020 Sep 24;30(10):1785-1794. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2020.06.005. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
PMID: 32605881DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Heather Kitzman, PhD
Baylor Scott and White Health
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Research personnel involved in delivering interventions were not allowed to facilitate the outcome measures. Project coordinator, key personnel, and trained volunteers (which included graduate students) collected all the data elements. Statisticians and data coordinators were blinded of intervention group assignments of the participants until the end of the study.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 29, 2019
First Posted
September 9, 2019
Study Start
February 22, 2013
Primary Completion
May 1, 2017
Study Completion
May 31, 2017
Last Updated
December 11, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
Contact site contact person