Comparison of Vaginal Misoprostol and Dinoprostone Prior to Copper Intrauterine Device Insertion in Nulliparous Women
1 other identifier
interventional
129
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To compare the effect of vaginal dinoprostone versus vaginal misoprostol administered before the copper intrauterine device(IUD) insertion in reducing IUD inertion pain and the difficulty in inserting the IUD in nulliparous women.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Sep 2019
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 4, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 6, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 10, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 20, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 20, 2020
CompletedJune 30, 2020
June 1, 2020
3 months
September 4, 2019
June 26, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The difference in pain scores during intrauterine device insertion
The difference in pain scores during intrauterine device insertion using visual analog scale from 0 to 10
10 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (4)
the difference in pain scores during tenaculum application
10 minutes
the difference in pain scores during sound insertion
10 minutes
the ease of IUD insertion
10 minutes
women's satisfaction level
10 minutes
Study Arms (3)
dinoprostone
EXPERIMENTAL1 vaginal tablet of dinoprostone (3mg) (prostin® E2, Pharmacia \& Upjohn, Puurs, Belgium) inserted by the study nurse 3 hours before IUD insertion.
misoprostol
ACTIVE COMPARATOR1 vaginal tablet of misoprostol (200 mcg) (Misotac®; Sigma Pharma, SAE, Egypt) inserted by the study nurse 3 hours before IUD insertion.
placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORone tablet of placebo inserted by the study nurse 3 hours before IUD insertion.
Interventions
1 vaginal tablet of dinoprostone (3mg) (prostin® E2, Pharmacia \& Upjohn, Puurs, Belgium) inserted by the study nurse 3hours before IUD insertion.
1 vaginal tablet of misoprostol (200mcg) (Misotac®; Sigma Pharma, SAE, Egypt) inserted by the study nurse 3 hours before IUD insertion.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- nulliparous women requesting copper IUD insertion
You may not qualify if:
- pregnancy, Parous women, contraindications or allergy to dinoprostone or misoprostol,contraindication to IUD insertion, untreated active cervicitis or vaginitis, undiagnosed abnormal uterine bleeding
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Ahmed Samy
Giza, 11231, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
AHMED SAMY
Cairo University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mohamed El Sharkawy
Cairo University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mohamed El Mahy
Cairo University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- assistant professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 4, 2019
First Posted
September 6, 2019
Study Start
September 10, 2019
Primary Completion
December 20, 2019
Study Completion
January 20, 2020
Last Updated
June 30, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-06