NCT03362905

Brief Summary

Despite being the most common method of contraception, the use of intrauterine devices (IUDs) is limited by the associated pain during insertion. Many pharmacologic interventions had been studied for their efficacy to reduce IUD insertion pain, of them, lidocaine was found to be superior over NSAIDs or other local anesthetics. This work aims at comparing the safety and efficacy of different lidocaine formulations to optimize selection in reduction of IUD associated pain.

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
123

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2017

Shorter than P25 for phase_4

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 30, 2017

Completed
3 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 3, 2017

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 5, 2017

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 5, 2018

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 10, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

December 5, 2017

Status Verified

November 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

November 30, 2017

Last Update Submit

November 30, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

LidocaineDosage formsPain scores

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Pain scores assessed by 10-point VAS scale

    VAS scores will be assessed on at three different points; baseline after application of speculum and analgesic administration, after grasping cervix with tenaculum, then following hysterometry and IUD insertion.

    1 year

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Patient satisfaction to IUD insertion

    1 year

Study Arms (3)

Lidocaine spray Arm

EXPERIMENTAL

This arm will receive lidocaine spray (Lidocaine topical aerosol ®, 10%, Arab drug co., Egypt) with dose four puffs (50 ml, 10 mg/puff) will be applied to the cervical canal and cervix.

Drug: Lidocaine topical

Lidocaine cream Arm

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

This arm will receive topical cream (Pridocaine ®, Global Napi, Egypt) with a dose of 2g lidocaine cream will be applied to the cervix via cotton swab.

Drug: Lidocaine topical

Lidocaine injection Arm

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

This arm will receive lidocaine injection (Debocaine®, 2%, Sigma-Tec, Egypt) with a dose of 80-200 mg equivalent to 10 ml lidocaine (20 mg/ml) is injected at four and eight o'clock of the cervico-vaginal junction, and 2 ml to the area to be grasped with the tenaculum for paracervical block.

Drug: Lidocaine topical

Interventions

Local anesthetic for reduction of IUD associated pain

Lidocaine cream ArmLidocaine injection ArmLidocaine spray Arm

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 55 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Multiparous women.
  • Over 18 years of age and eligible for IUD insertion.
  • Application of IUD will be done in postmenstrual period.

You may not qualify if:

  • Null parity. 2. History of failed intrauterine device insertion (uterine perforation, acute expulsion).
  • \. Copper allergy. 4. Uterine anomaly. 5. Post-partum endometritis or septic abortion in the past three months. 6. Untreated cervicitis/vaginitis, including bacterial vaginosis. 7. Immunosuppression. 8. History of lidocaine ,prilocaine allergy. 9. Analgesic or anxiolytic use within the last 24 hours before the procedure. 10. Wilson's disease. 11. Suspicion of pregnancy. 12. Untreated abnormal uterine bleeding.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (9)

  • Aksoy H, Aksoy U, Ozyurt S, Acmaz G, Babayigit M. Lidocaine 10% spray to the cervix reduces pain during intrauterine device insertion: a double-blind randomised controlled trial. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2016 Apr;42(2):83-7. doi: 10.1136/jfprhc-2014-100917. Epub 2015 Mar 10.

    PMID: 25759418BACKGROUND
  • Buhling KJ, Hauck B, Dermout S, Ardaens K, Marions L. Understanding the barriers and myths limiting the use of intrauterine contraception in nulliparous women: results of a survey of European/Canadian healthcare providers. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Dec;183:146-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.10.020. Epub 2014 Oct 30.

    PMID: 25461369BACKGROUND
  • Lopez LM, Bernholc A, Zeng Y, Allen RH, Bartz D, O'Brien PA, Hubacher D. Interventions for pain with intrauterine device insertion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 29;2015(7):CD007373. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007373.pub3.

    PMID: 26222246BACKGROUND
  • Gemzell-Danielsson K, Mansour D, Fiala C, Kaunitz AM, Bahamondes L. Management of pain associated with the insertion of intrauterine contraceptives. Hum Reprod Update. 2013 Jul-Aug;19(4):419-27. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmt022. Epub 2013 May 12.

    PMID: 23670222BACKGROUND
  • Bahamondes L, Mansour D, Fiala C, Kaunitz AM, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Practical advice for avoidance of pain associated with insertion of intrauterine contraceptives. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2014 Jan;40(1):54-60. doi: 10.1136/jfprhc-2013-100636. Epub 2013 Sep 27.

    PMID: 24076534BACKGROUND
  • Akers AY, Steinway C, Sonalkar S, Perriera LK, Schreiber C, Harding J, Garcia-Espana JF. Reducing Pain During Intrauterine Device Insertion: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Adolescents and Young Women. Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Oct;130(4):795-802. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002242.

    PMID: 28885425BACKGROUND
  • Tavakolian S, Doulabi MA, Baghban AA, Mortazavi A, Ghorbani M. Lidocaine-Prilocaine Cream as Analgesia for IUD Insertion: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Triple Blinded Study. Glob J Health Sci. 2015 Jan 27;7(4):399-404. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v7n4p399.

    PMID: 25946948BACKGROUND
  • Golzari SE, Soleimanpour H, Mahmoodpoor A, Safari S, Ala A. Lidocaine and pain management in the emergency department: a review article. Anesth Pain Med. 2014 Feb 15;4(1):e15444. doi: 10.5812/aapm.15444. eCollection 2014 Feb.

    PMID: 24660158BACKGROUND
  • Mody SK, Kiley J, Rademaker A, Gawron L, Stika C, Hammond C. Pain control for intrauterine device insertion: a randomized trial of 1% lidocaine paracervical block. Contraception. 2012 Dec;86(6):704-9. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.06.004. Epub 2012 Jul 6.

    PMID: 22770792BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Lidocaine

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AcetanilidesAnilidesAmidesOrganic ChemicalsAniline CompoundsAmines

Central Study Contacts

Hadeer Elhagri, M.B.B.Ch

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: This study will include 123 patients who are candidates for IUD contraception. The aim of the study will be explained to all patients and an informed written consent will be taken. After recruitment, patients will be randomized to the 3 study arms using computer generated randomization sheet using MedCalcc version 13 to receive any of: lidocaine spray, cream and injection
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Resident physician

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 30, 2017

First Posted

December 5, 2017

Study Start

December 3, 2017

Primary Completion

December 5, 2018

Study Completion

January 10, 2019

Last Updated

December 5, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-11