Physical Activity in the Elderly Spine Patient
PAESP
2 other identifiers
observational
206
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Purpose Physical activity reduces the risk of several diseases of the body and the mind1, 2 and can help the elderly maintain physical abilities and self-efficacy in daily life1. The overall purpose of the project is to provide clinicians with a tool to objectively assess physical activity in daily life and thus provide an informed basis for individualized care of elderly patients with spine disease. We would like to introduce this tool to a broad population of elderly patients with low back pain to give an overview of the range and variability in physical activity. We will also look into a method for accurate step count in spine disorders where patients have severe walking impairment due to affected lumbar nerve roots.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jun 2019
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 5, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 26, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 6, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2023
CompletedMarch 16, 2023
March 1, 2023
3.6 years
June 5, 2019
March 14, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (8)
Accelerometer-data
Raw accelerometer data will be collected by four accelerometers (Axivity AX3. ), which will be placed at the participants' hip in the midaxillary line, at the thigh, ankle and on the lower back, secured by hypo-allergenic band aids.
Collected during the Standardized Movement Protocol at baseline.
Accelerometer-data
Raw accelerometer data collected for 7 consecutive days, by one accelerometer (Axivity AX3) secured by band-aid. The placement of the accelerometer will be decided in phase A.
At baseline
Accelerometer-data
Raw accelerometer data collected for 7 consecutive days, by one accelerometer (Axivity AX3) secured by band-aid. The placement of the accelerometer will be decided in phase A.
3 months post-surgery
The Self-Paced Walking Test
Walking on a pre-determined rute until stopped by symptoms of LSS. Recording time and distance walked.
At baseline as part of the Standardized Movement Procotol
The Self-Paced Walking Test
Walking on a pre-determined rute until stopped by symptoms of LSS. Recording time and distance walked.
At baseline
The Self-Paced Walking Test
Walking on a pre-determined rute until stopped by symptoms of LSS. Recording time and distance walked.
3 months post-surgery
The Oswestry Disability Index
Questionnaire on function in patients with lower back pain. Score 0-100% where 100% is severe disability
At baseline
The Oswestry Disability Index
Questionnaire on function in patients with lower back pain. Score 0-100% where 100% is severe disability
3 months post-surgery.
Secondary Outcomes (10)
The Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire
At baseline
The Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire
3 months post-surgery
Visual Analog Scale for Back and Leg Pain
At baseline
Visual Analog Scale for Back and Leg Pain
3 months post-surgery
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
At baseline
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
LSS Participants
Patients with lumbar spinal stenosis
Background population
Populationdata from existing research project
LBP Participants
Patients with Low back Pain
Interventions
Participant walking, cycling and sitting according to a pre-specified protocol.
7 days of accelerometer monitoring in participants home-environment.
Eligibility Criteria
The study will include patients with LSS on a degenerative basis, age \>=60, referred to the spine center by primary or secondary health care, in the Region of Southern Denmark. Patients with Low Back Pain will be included from three chiropractic clinics in the Region of Southern Denmark. Healthy participants will be identified among hospital staff, acquaintances and participating patients' spouse/acquaintances.
You may qualify if:
- Informed written consent.
- Fluent in Danish in reading and speaking.
- Age \>60 with LSS, +/- spondylolisthesis diagnosed via clinical examination and MRI. Suffering from neurogenic claudication with positive answers to a set of six items characteristic to LSS\[29\].
- Patients in phase A will be included to represent a spectrum of severeness of LSS and age. Severeness will be evaluated by ODI score, VAS and self-reported maximum walking distance.
You may not qualify if:
- Other disease limiting walking rather than neurogenic claudication, such as cardiopulmonary diseases, vascular claudication, recent operation or fracture of spine, pelvis or leg, severe hip or knee arthrosis (not efficiently threated by hip/knee replacement), systemic muscular diseases, impaired vision.
- Traits which interfere with the participants' gait pattern, such as habitual use of walking aids during walking at home and away from home, drop foot.
- Eligibility Criteria for Patients with LBP:
- Informed written consent.
- Fluent in Danish in reading and speaking.
- Age \>60
- Suffering from Low Back Pain
- Low Back Pain is the primary source of pain and disability.
- Eligibility Criteria for Healthy Participants:
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Spine Centre of Southern Denmark
Middelfart, 5500, Denmark
Related Publications (11)
Lurie J, Tomkins-Lane C. Management of lumbar spinal stenosis. BMJ. 2016 Jan 4;352:h6234. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h6234.
PMID: 26727925BACKGROUNDAmmendolia C, Stuber K, Tomkins-Lane C, Schneider M, Rampersaud YR, Furlan AD, Kennedy CA. What interventions improve walking ability in neurogenic claudication with lumbar spinal stenosis? A systematic review. Eur Spine J. 2014 Jun;23(6):1282-301. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3262-6. Epub 2014 Mar 15.
PMID: 24633719BACKGROUNDNorden J, Smuck M, Sinha A, Hu R, Tomkins-Lane C. Objective measurement of free-living physical activity (performance) in lumbar spinal stenosis: are physical activity guidelines being met? Spine J. 2017 Jan;17(1):26-33. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.10.016. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
PMID: 27793759BACKGROUNDHenrica C. W. de Vet CBT, Lidwine B. Mokkink, Dirk L. Knol (2011) Measurement in Medicine A Practical Guide
BACKGROUNDJespersen AB, Gustafsson MEAK. Correlation between the Oswestry Disability Index and objective measurements of walking capacity and performance in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic literature review. Eur Spine J. 2018 Jul;27(7):1604-1613. doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5520-5. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
PMID: 29508075BACKGROUNDTomkins CC, Battie MC, Rogers T, Jiang H, Petersen S. A criterion measure of walking capacity in lumbar spinal stenosis and its comparison with a treadmill protocol. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Oct 15;34(22):2444-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b03fc8.
PMID: 19829259BACKGROUNDWebber SC, St John PD. Comparison of ActiGraph GT3X+ and StepWatch Step Count Accuracy in Geriatric Rehabilitation Patients. J Aging Phys Act. 2016 Jul;24(3):451-8. doi: 10.1123/japa.2015-0234. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
PMID: 26751505BACKGROUNDTreacy D, Hassett L, Schurr K, Chagpar S, Paul SS, Sherrington C. Validity of Different Activity Monitors to Count Steps in an Inpatient Rehabilitation Setting. Phys Ther. 2017 May 1;97(5):581-588. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzx010.
PMID: 28339904BACKGROUNDMcCullagh R, Dillon C, O'Connell AM, Horgan NF, Timmons S. Step-Count Accuracy of 3 Motion Sensors for Older and Frail Medical Inpatients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Feb;98(2):295-302. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.08.476. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
PMID: 27666157BACKGROUNDDijkstra B, Kamsma Y, Zijlstra W. Detection of gait and postures using a miniaturised triaxial accelerometer-based system: accuracy in community-dwelling older adults. Age Ageing. 2010 Mar;39(2):259-62. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afp249. Epub 2010 Jan 18. No abstract available.
PMID: 20083616BACKGROUNDPark J, Ishikawa-Takata K, Tanaka S, Bessyo K, Tanaka S, Kimura T. Accuracy of Estimating Step Counts and Intensity Using Accelerometers in Older People With or Without Assistive Devices. J Aging Phys Act. 2017 Jan;25(1):41-50. doi: 10.1123/japa.2015-0201. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
PMID: 27180730BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Malin EK Gustafsson, M.D
Spine Centre of Southern Denmark
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 3 Months
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Ph.D.-student
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 5, 2019
First Posted
September 6, 2019
Study Start
June 26, 2019
Primary Completion
February 1, 2023
Study Completion
February 1, 2023
Last Updated
March 16, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- SAP, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Will be made available to scientific journals upon request, in anonymous form, for 6 months from request.
- Access Criteria
- IPD will be made available in connection to anticipated publication, to the publishing scientific journal, when required by the journal to ensure scientific integrity.
All IPD that underlie results of scientific articles