NCT03548441

Brief Summary

Introduction: Lumbar spinal stenosis is a common cause of low back and leg pain in elderly impacting physical activity and quality of life. Initial treatments are non-surgical options. If unsuccessful, surgery is advocated. The literature is not clear as to the outcome of surgery when compared to non-surgical treatment, and the optimal time for surgery is not explicit. Materials and analysis: This observational study is designed to investigate the course of treatment, compare effectiveness of surgical and non-surgical treatment in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis, and identify prognostic factors for outcome in the context of current clinical practice. Prospectively registered data on treatment, outcome and patient characteristics are collected from nationwide registers on health and social issues, a clinical registry of people with chronic back pain and hospital medical records. Primary outcome is change in physical function measured by the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire. Secondary outcomes are changes in symptom severity, pain-related function, health-related quality of life, and general self-efficacy. All outcomes are measured at baseline, 6 months and 12 months follow up. Comparisons on these variables will be made between those who undergo surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis and those not receiving surgery at 12 months follow up according to different analysis populations. Prognostic factors include treatment allocation, back and leg pain intensity, comorbidity, duration of symptoms, pre-treatment function, self-rated health, income, general self-efficacy and magnetic resonance imaging graded compression of central stenosis. Ethics and dissemination: The study has been evaluated by The Regional Committees on Health Research for Southern Denmark (S-20172000-200) and notified to the Danish Data Protection Agency (17/30636). All participants provide consent. Findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed publications and presented at national and international conferences following the guidance from the STROBE and PROGRESS statement. Potential sources of bias will be addressed using ROBINS-I.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
600

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2017

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2017

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 30, 2018

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 7, 2018

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

October 26, 2018

Status Verified

October 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

3.7 years

First QC Date

April 30, 2018

Last Update Submit

October 25, 2018

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Physical function

    Change in physical function score in the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) collected through a clinical registry of people with chronic back pain (SpineData). The ZCQ is a condition-specific self-reported measure of symptom severity, physical function and satisfaction with treatment in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. The questionnaire is composed of three domains (subscales) with a Likert-type scale. The physical function subscale includes 6 items addressing walking distance and walking ability. All but one item have Likert response scales with 4 categories. The physical function subscale score is calculated from the unweighted mean of all answered items. The possible range of the score is 1 to 4. Lower scores indicate less disability.

    Between baseline and 12 months follow up

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Symptom severity

    Between baseline and 12 months follow up

  • Pain related physical function

    Between baseline and 12 months follow up

  • Health related quality of life

    Between baseline and 12 months follow up

  • General self-efficacy

    Between baseline and 12 months follow up

Other Outcomes (19)

  • Diagnosis

    At baseline

  • Age

    At baseline

  • Sex

    At baseline

  • +16 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Surgery

Exposed

Procedure: Surgery

Non-surgical management

Non-exposed

Other: Non-surgical management

Interventions

SurgeryPROCEDURE

Patients receiving surgical treatment undergo various types of posterior decompressive surgery with or without spinal fusion. The method used for decompressive surgery or fusions is determined solely by the surgeon.

Surgery

Patients managing lumbar spinal stenosis non-surgically are either referred to rehabilitation primary health care center or referred back to their general practitioner for treatment. Treatment may include physiotherapy, chiropractic treatment, lifestyle changes and/or pain management. Post-surgically patients may also be referred to rehabilitation at a primary health care center.

Non-surgical management

Eligibility Criteria

Age61 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

All patients \>60 years, diagnosed with lumbar spinal stenosis and having first clinical contact at the Spine Center of Southern Denmark, Hospital Lillebaelt, Middelfart from January 1st - December 31st 2017 eligible for this study, will be identified in the National Patient Register. Follow-up time from the date of first clinical contact (baseline) is 6 and 12 months.

You may qualify if:

  • \>60 years.
  • ICD-10 diagnosis of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis registered in the nationwide patient registry between January 1st - December 31st 2017.
  • Included in the SpineData registry.
  • Give consent to use patient-reported data for research purposes

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Spine Centre of Souther Denmark

Middelfart, Fyn, 5500, Denmark

RECRUITING

Related Publications (1)

  • Brogger HA, Maribo T, Christensen R, Schiottz-Christensen B. Comparative effectiveness and prognostic factors for outcome of surgical and non-surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis in an elderly population: protocol for an observational study. BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 19;8(12):e024949. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024949.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Spinal Stenosis

Interventions

Surgical Procedures, Operative

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Spinal DiseasesBone DiseasesMusculoskeletal Diseases

Study Officials

  • Helle A Brøgger, MSc

    1) Spine Centre of Southern Denmark, 2) University of Southern Denmark, 3) The Parker Research Institute, 4) University College South Denmark

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Robin Christensen, PhD

    1) The Parker Research Institute 2) Odense University Hospital

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Thomas Maribo, PhD

    1) Aarhus University 2) DEFACTUM

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Berit Schiøttz-Christensen, PhD

    1) Spine Centre of Southern Denmark, 2) University of Southern Denmark

    STUDY CHAIR

Central Study Contacts

Helle A Brøgger, MSc

CONTACT

Berit Schiøttz-Christensen, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Target Duration
2 Years
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 30, 2018

First Posted

June 7, 2018

Study Start

January 1, 2017

Primary Completion

September 1, 2020

Study Completion

September 1, 2020

Last Updated

October 26, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-10

Locations