Comparative Effectiveness and Prognostic Factors of Surgical and Non-surgical Management of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
1 other identifier
observational
600
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Introduction: Lumbar spinal stenosis is a common cause of low back and leg pain in elderly impacting physical activity and quality of life. Initial treatments are non-surgical options. If unsuccessful, surgery is advocated. The literature is not clear as to the outcome of surgery when compared to non-surgical treatment, and the optimal time for surgery is not explicit. Materials and analysis: This observational study is designed to investigate the course of treatment, compare effectiveness of surgical and non-surgical treatment in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis, and identify prognostic factors for outcome in the context of current clinical practice. Prospectively registered data on treatment, outcome and patient characteristics are collected from nationwide registers on health and social issues, a clinical registry of people with chronic back pain and hospital medical records. Primary outcome is change in physical function measured by the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire. Secondary outcomes are changes in symptom severity, pain-related function, health-related quality of life, and general self-efficacy. All outcomes are measured at baseline, 6 months and 12 months follow up. Comparisons on these variables will be made between those who undergo surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis and those not receiving surgery at 12 months follow up according to different analysis populations. Prognostic factors include treatment allocation, back and leg pain intensity, comorbidity, duration of symptoms, pre-treatment function, self-rated health, income, general self-efficacy and magnetic resonance imaging graded compression of central stenosis. Ethics and dissemination: The study has been evaluated by The Regional Committees on Health Research for Southern Denmark (S-20172000-200) and notified to the Danish Data Protection Agency (17/30636). All participants provide consent. Findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed publications and presented at national and international conferences following the guidance from the STROBE and PROGRESS statement. Potential sources of bias will be addressed using ROBINS-I.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jan 2017
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 30, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 7, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2020
CompletedOctober 26, 2018
October 1, 2018
3.7 years
April 30, 2018
October 25, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Physical function
Change in physical function score in the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) collected through a clinical registry of people with chronic back pain (SpineData). The ZCQ is a condition-specific self-reported measure of symptom severity, physical function and satisfaction with treatment in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. The questionnaire is composed of three domains (subscales) with a Likert-type scale. The physical function subscale includes 6 items addressing walking distance and walking ability. All but one item have Likert response scales with 4 categories. The physical function subscale score is calculated from the unweighted mean of all answered items. The possible range of the score is 1 to 4. Lower scores indicate less disability.
Between baseline and 12 months follow up
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Symptom severity
Between baseline and 12 months follow up
Pain related physical function
Between baseline and 12 months follow up
Health related quality of life
Between baseline and 12 months follow up
General self-efficacy
Between baseline and 12 months follow up
Other Outcomes (19)
Diagnosis
At baseline
Age
At baseline
Sex
At baseline
- +16 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Surgery
Exposed
Non-surgical management
Non-exposed
Interventions
Patients receiving surgical treatment undergo various types of posterior decompressive surgery with or without spinal fusion. The method used for decompressive surgery or fusions is determined solely by the surgeon.
Patients managing lumbar spinal stenosis non-surgically are either referred to rehabilitation primary health care center or referred back to their general practitioner for treatment. Treatment may include physiotherapy, chiropractic treatment, lifestyle changes and/or pain management. Post-surgically patients may also be referred to rehabilitation at a primary health care center.
Eligibility Criteria
All patients \>60 years, diagnosed with lumbar spinal stenosis and having first clinical contact at the Spine Center of Southern Denmark, Hospital Lillebaelt, Middelfart from January 1st - December 31st 2017 eligible for this study, will be identified in the National Patient Register. Follow-up time from the date of first clinical contact (baseline) is 6 and 12 months.
You may qualify if:
- \>60 years.
- ICD-10 diagnosis of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis registered in the nationwide patient registry between January 1st - December 31st 2017.
- Included in the SpineData registry.
- Give consent to use patient-reported data for research purposes
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Spine Centre of Southern Denmarklead
- University of Southern Denmarkcollaborator
- Parker Research Institutecollaborator
- Odense University Hospitalcollaborator
- University College South Denmarkcollaborator
- University of Aarhuscollaborator
- Defactum, Central Denmark Regioncollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Spine Centre of Souther Denmark
Middelfart, Fyn, 5500, Denmark
Related Publications (1)
Brogger HA, Maribo T, Christensen R, Schiottz-Christensen B. Comparative effectiveness and prognostic factors for outcome of surgical and non-surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis in an elderly population: protocol for an observational study. BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 19;8(12):e024949. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024949.
PMID: 30573489DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Helle A Brøgger, MSc
1) Spine Centre of Southern Denmark, 2) University of Southern Denmark, 3) The Parker Research Institute, 4) University College South Denmark
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Robin Christensen, PhD
1) The Parker Research Institute 2) Odense University Hospital
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Thomas Maribo, PhD
1) Aarhus University 2) DEFACTUM
- STUDY CHAIR
Berit Schiøttz-Christensen, PhD
1) Spine Centre of Southern Denmark, 2) University of Southern Denmark
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 2 Years
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 30, 2018
First Posted
June 7, 2018
Study Start
January 1, 2017
Primary Completion
September 1, 2020
Study Completion
September 1, 2020
Last Updated
October 26, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-10