NCT04076774

Brief Summary

This research study will determine how well two female condoms perform when used during sex. One of these condoms (FC2) is already commercially available in South Africa. The other female condom, "Wondaleaf Condom" is a new female condom. Participants will use both condoms. The study aims to determine how well these condoms work comparatively. Study visits include a screening/enrolment visit and 2 follow up visits.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
220

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2019

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 27, 2019

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 28, 2019

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 3, 2019

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 18, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 18, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

October 23, 2019

Status Verified

October 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

August 28, 2019

Last Update Submit

October 22, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

female condomHIV and STI preventionCondom acceptabilityWondaleafFC2

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (7)

  • Clinical breakage

    Clinical breakage is defined as breakage during sexual intercourse or during withdrawal of the female condom from the vagina. Clinical breakage is breakage with potential adverse clinical consequences. The clinical breakage rate is calculated by dividing the number of female condoms reported to have broken during sexual intercourse or during withdrawal by the number of female condoms used during sexual intercourse.

    Number of condoms allocated in each arm is 5. Duration of time these condoms will be used depends on the coital frequency of the couple. Therefore the duration of time in each arm is dependent on time take to use all 5 condoms. (approximately 3-6 weeks)

  • Total breakage

    Total breakage is defined as the sum of all female condom breakages at any time before, during or after sexual intercourse. It includes both clinical breakages and non-clinical breakages. The total breakage rate is calculated by dividing the total number of female condoms that broke by the number of female condom packages opened

    Number of condoms allocated in each arm is 5. Duration of time these condoms will be used depends on the coital frequency of the couple. Therefore the duration of time in each arm is dependent on time take to use all 5 condoms. (approximately 3-6 weeks)

  • Slippage

    Slippage is defined as an instance when a female condom slips completely out of the vagina during sexual intercourse. The slippage rate is calculated by dividing the number of female condoms that slipped by the number of female condoms used during sexual intercourse.

    Number of condoms allocated in each arm is 5. Duration of time these condoms will be used depends on the coital frequency of the couple. Therefore the duration of time in each arm is dependent on time take to use all 5 condoms. (approximately 3-6 weeks)

  • Misdirection

    Invagination is defined as an instance when the external retention feature of the female condom is partially or fully pushed into the vagina during sexual intercourse. The invagination rate is calculated by dividing the number of events of invagination by the number of female condoms used during sexual intercourse.

    Number of condoms allocated in each arm is 5. Duration of time these condoms will be used depends on the coital frequency of the couple. Therefore the duration of time in each arm is dependent on time take to use all 5 condoms. (approximately 3-6 weeks)

  • Invagination

    Invagination is defined as an instance when the external retention feature of the female condom is partially or fully pushed into the vagina during sexual intercourse. The invagination rate is calculated by dividing the number of events of invagination by the number of female condoms used during sexual intercourse.

    Number of condoms allocated in each arm is 5. Duration of time these condoms will be used depends on the coital frequency of the couple. Therefore the duration of time in each arm is dependent on time take to use all 5 condoms. (approximately 3-6 weeks)

  • Total clinical failure

    Total clinical failure is defined as the sum of female condoms that clinically break or slip, or are associated with misdirection, invagination or any additional failure modes(s) identified in the risk assessment which results in the reduction of the female condom protective function. The total clinical failure rate is calculated by dividing the number of female condoms with a clinical failure by the number of female condoms used during sexual intercourse.

    Number of condoms allocated in each arm is 5. Duration of time these condoms will be used depends on the coital frequency of the couple. Therefore the duration of time in each arm is dependent on time take to use all 5 condoms. (approximately 3-6 weeks)

  • Total female condom failure

    Total female condom failure is defined as a female condom for which a non-clinical breakage, clinical breakage or slippage occurs, or is associated with misdirection, invagination or any additional failure modes(s) identified in the risk assessment. The female condom failure rate is calculated by dividing the number of female condoms that fail by the number of female condom packages opened.

    Number of condoms allocated in each arm is 5. Duration of time these condoms will be used depends on the coital frequency of the couple. Therefore the duration of time in each arm is dependent on time take to use all 5 condoms. (approximately 3-6 weeks)

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Safety (Adverse Events)

    Number of condoms allocated in each arm is 5. Duration of time these condoms will be used depends on the coital frequency of the couple. Therefore the duration of time in each arm is dependent on time take to use all 5 condoms. (approximately 3-6 weeks)

  • Acceptability

    Number of condoms allocated in each arm is 5. Duration of time these condoms will be used depends on the coital frequency of the couple. Therefore the duration of time in each arm is dependent on time take to use all 5 condoms. (approximately 3-6 weeks)

Study Arms (2)

Wondaleaf female condom

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will be provided with 5 Wondaleaf condoms first at enrolment and switched to 5 FC2 condoms at the first follow up visit

Device: Wondaleaf Female CondomDevice: FC2 Female Condom

FC2 Female condom

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants will be provided with 5 FC2 condoms first at enrolment and switched to 5 Wondaleaf condoms at the first follow up visit

Device: Wondaleaf Female CondomDevice: FC2 Female Condom

Interventions

Wondaleaf: Wondaleaf is an ultra thin (of 0.02 mm) polyurethane female/male condom (16x8cm) that has folded extended adhesive shields (front 18x18cm, back 18x10cm), which at unfolding covers the entire external genitalia to prevent direct skin contact and exchange of body fluid between sexual partners during intercourse. Insertion of the condom body into the vagina is through use of a small medical grade cotton tissue packed inside the foil package. This is inserted into the end of the condom body and used to push the condom into the vagina. Each condom is individually packaged without prior lubrication. However, lubricant is expected to be used at donning the condom and during sexual intercourse. The lubricant will be supplied in separate packets together with the condom. Unlike latex, polyurethane condoms are unlikely to cause any allergic reaction and are much stronger than conventional latex condoms

FC2 Female condomWondaleaf female condom

FC2: The FC2 is a second-generation female condom manufactured by the Female Health Company (Chicago, IL). The FC2 has US FDA approval and has been granted the CE Mark (Conformité Européenne) of the European Union. The FC2 is the only female condom that has been pre-qualified by the World Health Organisation. The device is similar in design to the FC1, but is made from a synthetic polymer (nitrile) film that is softer and more elastic than the polyurethane of the earlier device. The condom is designed as a loose-fitting pouch that lines the vagina. It has two flexible rings. The outer ring at the open end is rolled from the nitrile material. The outer ring remains outside the vagina and covers the external genitalia during intercourse. An internal polyurethane ring is removable and serves as the insertion mechanism and anchors the device within the vagina. FC2 measures 180mm in length and 80mm in lay-flat width. The device is pre-lubricated with dimethicone.

FC2 Female condomWondaleaf female condom

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 45 Years
Sexfemale(Gender-based eligibility)
Gender Eligibility DetailsParticipants must be female as female condoms inserted vaginally are being evaluated
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Be between the ages of 18 and 45 years (inclusive);
  • Be literate (able to read a newspaper or letter easily);
  • Be sexually active (defined as having at least two vaginal coital acts per week and not being abstinent in the month prior to enrolment);
  • Be in an exclusive (monogamous) sexual relationship with her spouse or partner while participating in this research study;
  • Have been in a sexual relationship with this partner for at least 6 months;
  • Not be a sex worker;
  • Not be pregnant (as determined by pregnancy testing) or planning a pregnancy during the time of the research study;
  • Be without observable evidence of Sexually Transmitted Infections (STI) as determined through syndromic diagnosis and vaginal examination;
  • Be using hormonal or other non-barrier contraception (e.g. Oral Contraception (OCs), injectable, implant, Intra Uterine Device (IUD), or have had a tubal sterilization);
  • Not be menopausal (defined as 12 months without menstruation);
  • Not have had a hysterectomy;
  • Not have known sensitivities or allergies to latex, polyurethane, vaginal/sexual lubricants or the lubricants used on condoms;
  • Willing to give informed consent;
  • Willing to complete the FC coital use logs;
  • Willing to use the study condoms as directed;
  • +4 more criteria

You may not qualify if:

  • None specified

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

MatCH Research Unit [Maternal, Adolescent and Child Health Research Unit]

Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, 4001, South Africa

Location

Related Publications (18)

  • Trussell J, Sturgen K, Strickler J, Dominik R. Comparative contraceptive efficacy of the female condom and other barrier methods. Fam Plann Perspect. 1994 Mar-Apr;26(2):66-72.

    PMID: 8033980BACKGROUND
  • Soper DE, Shoupe D, Shangold GA, Shangold MM, Gutmann J, Mercer L. Prevention of vaginal trichomoniasis by compliant use of the female condom. Sex Transm Dis. 1993 May-Jun;20(3):137-9. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199305000-00003.

    PMID: 8511706BACKGROUND
  • Fontanet AL, Saba J, Chandelying V, Sakondhavat C, Bhiraleus P, Rugpao S, Chongsomchai C, Kiriwat O, Tovanabutra S, Dally L, Lange JM, Rojanapithayakorn W. Protection against sexually transmitted diseases by granting sex workers in Thailand the choice of using the male or female condom: results from a randomized controlled trial. AIDS. 1998 Oct 1;12(14):1851-9. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199814000-00017.

    PMID: 9792386BACKGROUND
  • French PP, Latka M, Gollub EL, Rogers C, Hoover DR, Stein ZA. Use-effectiveness of the female versus male condom in preventing sexually transmitted disease in women. Sex Transm Dis. 2003 May;30(5):433-9. doi: 10.1097/00007435-200305000-00010.

    PMID: 12916135BACKGROUND
  • Hoke TH, Feldblum PJ, Van Damme K, Nasution MD, Grey TW, Wong EL, Ralimamonjy L, Raharimalala L, Rasamindrakotroka A. Temporal trends in sexually transmitted infection prevalence and condom use following introduction of the female condom to Madagascar sex workers. Int J STD AIDS. 2007 Jul;18(7):461-6. doi: 10.1258/095646207781147175.

    PMID: 17623503BACKGROUND
  • PATH and United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). Female condom: a powerful tool for protection. Seattle: UNFPA, PATH; 2006. Available at: http://www.unfpa.org/upload/lib_pub_file/617_filename_female_condom.pdf.

    BACKGROUND
  • World Health Organization (WHO), United States Agency for International Development, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Family Planning, A Global Handbook for Providers. Baltimore, MD: Information & Knowledge for Optimal Health (INFO) Project; 2008.

    BACKGROUND
  • Beksinska M, Smit J, Joanis C, Usher-Patel M, Potter W. Female condom technology: new products and regulatory issues. Contraception. 2011 Apr;83(4):316-21. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.07.022. Epub 2010 Sep 15.

    PMID: 21397088BACKGROUND
  • Ting RS, Wong EL, Tnay JK. A pilot study on the functional performance and acceptability of an innovative female condom (Wondaleaf(R)) in Malaysia. Open Access J Contracept. 2018 Jan 24;9:11-20. doi: 10.2147/OAJC.S152505. eCollection 2018.

    PMID: 29440937BACKGROUND
  • Beksinska M, Joanis C, Manning J, Smit J, Callahan M, Deperthes B, Usher-Patel M. Standardized definitions of failure modes for female condoms. Contraception. 2007 Apr;75(4):251-5. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2006.10.003. Epub 2007 Feb 7.

    PMID: 17362701BACKGROUND
  • Gallo MF, Grimes DA, Schulz KF. Non-latex versus latex male condoms for contraception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(2):CD003550. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003550.

    PMID: 12804475BACKGROUND
  • Williams, E., Experimental Designs Balanced for the Estimation of Residual Effects of Treatments. Australian Journal of Chemistry, 1949. 2(2): p. 149-168.

    BACKGROUND
  • STATA User's Guide. College Station, Texas, USA: StataCorp, LP.

    BACKGROUND
  • Beksinska ME, Piaggio G, Smit JA, Wu J, Zhang Y, Pienaar J, Greener R, Zhou Y, Joanis C. Performance and safety of the second-generation female condom (FC2) versus the Woman's, the VA worn-of-women, and the Cupid female condoms: a randomised controlled non-inferiority crossover trial. Lancet Glob Health. 2013 Sep;1(3):e146-52. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(13)70054-8. Epub 2013 Aug 23.

    PMID: 25104263BACKGROUND
  • Joanis C, Beksinska M, Hart C, Tweedy K, Linda J, Smit J. Three new female condoms: which do South-African women prefer? Contraception. 2011 Mar;83(3):248-54. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.08.002. Epub 2010 Sep 17.

    PMID: 21310287BACKGROUND
  • Taylor D. Issues in the design, analysis and interpretation of condom functionality studies. Contraception. 2009 Sep;80(3):237-44. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2009.03.004. Epub 2009 Apr 23.

    PMID: 19698815BACKGROUND
  • ISO 29943-2:2017 Condoms -- Guidance on clinical studies -- Part 2: Female condoms, clinical function studies based on self-reports.

    BACKGROUND
  • Beksinska M, Mphili N, Smit J. Functional performance of the Wondaleaf condom: A crossover, noninferiority, randomized clinical trial. Int J STD AIDS. 2023 Feb;34(2):114-121. doi: 10.1177/09564624221139899. Epub 2022 Nov 25.

Study Officials

  • Mags E Beksinska, PhD

    Maternal, Adolescent and Child Health Research Unit

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The two devices in the trial are distinctly different and so device specific training is required and so cannot be blinded. The statistician analysing the data will be blinded to female condom type.
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: This research study will be a two-period, cross-over randomized controlled trial to compare the functional performance, safety and acceptability of two FC types (FC2 and Wondaleaf).
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Deputy Executive Director

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 28, 2019

First Posted

September 3, 2019

Study Start

March 27, 2019

Primary Completion

October 18, 2019

Study Completion

October 18, 2019

Last Updated

October 23, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations