Comparison of Analgesic Requirements in Patients Receiving Nuss Operation Using 2 Different Anesthetic Adjuvants
ARNRD
Comparing Analgesic Requirements in Patients Receiving Nuss Operation Using Remifentanil or Dexmedetomidine as Anesthetic Adjuvants
1 other identifier
interventional
62
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Nowadays, general anaesthesia is carried under "balanced anesthesia technique" in which many anesthetic adjuvants are used simultaneously, including opioid analgesics in order to reduce the amount of inhalation agents. The most popular adjuvants used are remifentanil, which is an opioid analgesic, and dexmedetomidine. Both of these agents are short acting, can be infused with targeted concentrations, excreted shortly from the body with stable hemodynamics. Remifentanil, when infused for more than 2 hours, causes hyperalgesia to increase the amount of pain postoperatively as well as the amount of opioid analgesics. However, dexmedetomidine does not cause hyperalgesia and is known to have an opioid -sparing effect. In our center. In this study, we aim to compare the effects of remifentanil and dexmedetomidine on postoperative pain in patients undergoing Nuss procedure, which is a very painful operation on the chest wall.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 20, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 29, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 2, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 21, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 28, 2021
CompletedMarch 20, 2020
March 1, 2020
1.5 years
August 20, 2019
March 18, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Visual Analogue Scale
Pain scale ranges from 0 to 10. 0 means no pain at all, and 10 being the most severe pain anyone can imagine.
Between 1~6 hours postoperatively.
Visual Analogue Scale
Pain scale ranges from 0 to 10. 0 means no pain at all, and 10 being the most severe pain anyone can imagine.
Between 6~12 hours postoperatively.
Visual Analogue Scale
Pain scale ranges from 0 to 10. 0 means no pain at all, and 10 being the most severe pain anyone can imagine.
Between 12~24 hours postoperatively.
Visual Analogue Scale
Pain scale ranges from 0 to 10. 0 means no pain at all, and 10 being the most severe pain anyone can imagine.
Between 24~48 hours postoperatively.
Secondary Outcomes (16)
Amount of postoperative intravenous patient controlled analgesics (PCA) used
At 60 minutes after the end of surgery
Amount of fentanyl used postoperatively at the recovery unit
At 60 minutes after the end of surgery
Time needed for postoperative rescue opioid analgesics
At 60 minutes after the end of surgery
Amount of remifentanil or dexmedetomidine used intraoperatively
Immediately at the end of the surgery
Intraoperative hemodynamic change: Systolic blood pressure
1 minute after monitoring (of blood pressure, heart rate, pulse oxymeter and electrocardiogram) starts, when the patient arrives at the operating room
- +11 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Remifentanil group
SHAM COMPARATORIn both interventional groups, Sevoflurane is used as an inhalational agent, in 0.5-1.5% age-adjusted Minimal Alveolar Concentration (MAC). As explained above, remifentanil is infused with Target Controlled Infusion pump, and concentration is adjusted so that Bispectral index (BIS) is maintained as 40-60, which means that the patients are maintained in general anesthesia. Remifentanil is usually infused with the effect site concentration of 2.0 to 6.0 ng/ml during general anesthesia. If bradycardia or hypotension develops due to remifentanil infusion, the infusion rate could be reduced, or inotropic, vasopressor, anticholinergic agents can be used (ephedrine, atropine, etc.) to correct the side effects of the drug, or the drug infusion can even be ceased. At the end of the surgery when skin closure starts, remifentanil infusion will be stopped.
Dexmedetomidine group
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn both interventional groups, Sevoflurane is used as an inhalational agent, in 0.5-1.5% age-adjusted MAC (Minimal Alveolar Concentration). As explained above, dexmedetomidine is infused with syringe pump, and concentration is adjusted so that Bispectral index (BIS) is maintained as 40-60, which means that the patients are maintained in general anesthesia. Dexmedetomidine is loaded for 10 minutes in 1mcg/kg, and then infusion rate is set between 0.4 to 0.6mcg/kg/hour for this study. If bradycardia or hypotension develops due to remifentanil infusion, the infusion rate could be reduced, or inotropic, vasopressor, anticholinergic agents can be used (ephedrine, atropine, etc.) to correct the side effects of the drug, or the drug infusion can even be ceased. At the end of the surgery when skin closure starts, dexmedetomidine infusion will be stopped.
Interventions
Comparing effects of remifentanil versus dexmedetomidine
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults aged \>20
- Patients undergoing Nuss bar operation (pectus excavatum repair surgery)
- American Society of Anesthesiologists classification I \~ III
You may not qualify if:
- Drug abuse history
- Chronic pain in need of continuous opioid analgesics administration
- History of psychiatric diseases
- Preoperative bradycardia (heart rate \< 50/min) or arrythmia
- Cardiac diseases other than diabetes or hypertension - coronary artery disease, ischemic heart disease
- Moderate liver or kidney dysfunction
- Pregnant or breast feeding women
- Hypersensitivity to the study drugs
- Patients who do not agree to participate
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Jung Min Koolead
Study Sites (1)
Jung Min Koo
Seoul, South Korea
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jung Min Koo, M.D
Data recruitment
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 20, 2019
First Posted
August 29, 2019
Study Start
September 2, 2019
Primary Completion
February 21, 2021
Study Completion
February 28, 2021
Last Updated
March 20, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share