Evaluation on Standardized Circuits of the Interest of a Robotic Module of Assistance to the Driving
SWADAPT1
1 other identifier
interventional
25
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The device that is the subject of this investigation is a robotic assistance module for driving a semi-autonomous electric wheelchair. This module is designed to accessorize the electric wheelchair to improve the safety conditions when driving an electric wheelchair, thus reducing the wheelchair accident rate on the one hand and facilitating access to the wheelchair to persons who can not claim it without the use of a safety device of this type.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 3, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 18, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 18, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 21, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 28, 2019
CompletedNovember 13, 2019
November 1, 2019
15 days
June 21, 2019
November 12, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Number of collision
The primary judgment criterion is the number of collisions on different standardized circuits with and without activation of the robotic assistance module.
Day 1
Number of collision
The primary judgment criterion is the number of collisions on different standardized circuits with and without activation of the robotic assistance module.
Day 8
Number of collision
The primary judgment criterion is the number of collisions on different standardized circuits with and without activation of the robotic assistance module.
Day 15
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Driving Speed
Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15
Wheelchair Skill Test
Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15
NASA-Task Load Index
Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15
Ease of Use Questionnaire
Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15
UTAUT (Unified theory of acceptance of technology) questionnaire
Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15
Study Arms (2)
Electric wheelchair with activated assistance module
EXPERIMENTALThis condition will be achieved in 3 standardized test circuits of increasing difficulty, one week apart. At each session, the patient will perform the circuit 6 times, including 3 with activated assistance, in a random order established upstream.
Electric wheelchair with assistance module not activated
OTHERThis condition will be achieved in 3 standardized test circuits of increasing difficulty, one week apart. At each session, the patient will perform the circuit 6 times, including 3 without activated assistance, in a random order established upstream.
Interventions
This evaluation will be carried out in 3 standardized test circuits of increasing difficulty, one week apart. At each session, the patient will perform the circuit 6 times, including 3 with activated assistance
This evaluation will be carried out in 3 standardized test circuits of increasing difficulty, one week apart. At each session, the patient will perform the circuit 6 times, including 3 with no activated assistance
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Aged over 18,
- Having freely consented to participate in the study,
- suffering from neurological disorders such as cerebro-lesion or neuro-degeneration,
- Having benefited from a prescription of electric wheelchair and circulating in an electric wheelchair for more than 3 months,
- of which the electric wheelchair is the main mode of transport,
- The physical measurements (weight, height) are compatible with the use of the electric wheelchair chosen for the development of the robotics assistance module.
You may not qualify if:
- Understanding difficulties preventing the realization of the protocol,
- Motor disorders of the upper limb requiring additional driving technical assistance,
- Patient having expressed difficulties impacting his safety of sedan and / or exterior.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Pôle Saint-Hélier
Rennes, Brittany Region, 35000, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Philippe Gallien, Doctor
Pôle Saint Hélier
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- To minimize bias, this study will be randomized and conducted in single blind. The patient will not be aware of the activation or not of the assistance module placed on the electric wheelchair. Indeed, the investigative team will be in charge of the activation of the robotic module.
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 21, 2019
First Posted
August 28, 2019
Study Start
June 3, 2019
Primary Completion
June 18, 2019
Study Completion
June 18, 2019
Last Updated
November 13, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share