Safety and Efficacy of PRP for Treatment of Disc Pain
A Multi-Center, Randomized, Controlled, Double-blind Study Evaluating Safety and Efficacy of Hemocyte Autograft for Treatment of Single-Level and Multi- Level Lumbar, Thoracic and Cervical Discogenic Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
27
1 country
7
Brief Summary
This is a multi-center, randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial comparing hemocyte autograft (platelet rich plasma) to control injection (placebo) in subjects with reported cervical, thoracic or lumbar pain for at least 3 months with Pfirrmann grade changes at 7 or less and who are being considered for discography in order to identify pain generator discs in evaluation of potential surgical candidates.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started May 2016
Typical duration for not_applicable
7 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 17, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 18, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 19, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 22, 2019
CompletedDecember 4, 2019
December 1, 2019
2.6 years
August 19, 2019
December 2, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Patient Specific Functional Scale (PSFS)
The primary objective of this study is to determine safety and efficacy of a single injection of hemocyte autograft into diseased discs for the treatment of back and neck pain. The PSFS is a self-report, patient-specific outcome measure designed to assess functional change in patients with pain and musculoskeletal disorders. The total score = the sum of the activity scores (10 maximum, which reflects a better level of functioning)/the number of activities (7 maximum). At least two points improvement on the average Pain Specific Functional Scale (PSFS).
8 weeks from baseline
Adverse Event Reporting
Adverse events (AEs) and any other untoward signs or symptoms were collected at each study timepoint starting at the treatment injection. Serious adverse events (SAEs) determined by the investigator to be related to the study treatment were formally recorded. \[NOTE: NONE REPORTED THROUGHOUT STUDY DURATION\]
Baseline to 26 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NRPS)
8 weeks from baseline
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
8 weeks from baseline
Neck Disability Index (NDI)
8 weeks from baseline
Study Arms (2)
PRP/Hemocyte Autograft Intervention Arm
EXPERIMENTALAll subjects will have blood drawn (50 cc) from any access site and have it prepared for hemocyte autograft. Using a 20 gauge introducer and 25 gauge disc needle, subjects randomized to active condition will have exactly 3 cc of hemocyte autograft placed in a 3 cc syringe. The syringe barrels and tubing were covered with opaque tape so that the injector was blinded to the contents. 1-2 cc of PRP was injected into the nucleus pulposus of each identified treatment level disc for lumbar; 0.5-1 cc for thoracic and 0.5-1 cc for cervical.
Placebo Control Arm
PLACEBO COMPARATORAll subjects will have blood drawn (50 cc) from any access site and have it prepared for hemocyte autograft. Using a 20 gauge introducer and 25 gauge disc needle, subjects randomized to placebo condition will have exactly 3 cc of saline placed in a 3 cc syringe. 1-2 cc of saline was injected into the nucleus pulposus of each identified treatment level disc for lumbar; 0.5-1 cc for thoracic and 0.5-1 cc for cervical.
Interventions
The investigational product is hemocyte autograft derived from the subject's own blood. Subjects with a clinical diagnosis of discogenic pain had a discogram with ¼ cc to ½ cc of contrast injected by hand (leaving up to ½ cc contrast in the needle lumen and connecting tube); any concordant pain will be noted. Subjects received the injectant delineated by coordinator-provided randomization. Subjects were awake for the entirety of study treatment procedure. All subjects had blood drawn (50 cc) from any access site and double-centrifuged using the EmCyte Hemocyte Autograft system; the first spin separated the buffy coat, the second spin and subsequent siphoning separated a purified platelet sample.
Placebo injections will have saline placed in centrifuges and run for the duration required for PRP preparation. 3cc of saline will be placed in 3 cc syringes with opaque tape around the barrel to cover the fluid chamber. 1-2 cc of saline will be injected into the nucleus pulposus of each treatment level disc under fluoroscopy for lumbar; 0.5-1 cc for thoracic and 0.5-1 cc for cervical.
Trademarked name of an FDA-cleared product
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or Female at least 18 years of age.
- Clinically suspected discogenic pain in the cervical, thoracic or lumbar spine.
- Bring considered for discography in order to identify source of pain in the evaluation of potential surgical candidates.
- History of neck pain or mid or low back pain for at least 3 months.
- Failed to respond to conservative therapies that include physical therapy and analgesics.
- Documented Pfirrmann grade changes of 7 or less at each treatment level as represented by an MRI no more than 12 months old (extravasation not excluded).
You may not qualify if:
- Unresolved neck or back pain from a previous cervical, thoracic or lumbar surgery at any level.
- Any contraindication for discography or surgery
- Significant signs or symptoms of root or cord compression at treatment levels.
- Any diagnosis of a concurrent pain disorder or other concurrent cause of disability.
- Daily opioid requirements of greater than180 mg oral morphine equivalent
- (OME) per day.
- Current active systemic infection, or history of disc infection.
- Untreated disabling thought or mood disorder.
- Inability to provide informed consent including subjects in a socially compromised condition such as prisoners.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Neurological Associates of West Los Angeleslead
- EmCyte Corporationcollaborator
- BioRich Medicalcollaborator
Study Sites (7)
Comprehensive Spine and Sports Center
Campbell, California, 89148, United States
Neurological Associates of West LA
Santa Monica, California, 90403, United States
The Spine Institute: Center for Spinal Restoration
Santa Monica, California, 90403, United States
Thrive Treatment
Santa Monica, California, 90405, United States
Georgia Pain and Spine
Peachtree City, Georgia, 30269, United States
Millenium Pain Center
Chicago, Illinois, 61704, United States
Precision Spine Care
Tyler, Texas, 75701, United States
Related Publications (28)
Terry, A., Lutz, G., et al. Lumbar Intradiscal Platelet Rich Plasma Injections: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial. (2013), International Spine Intervention Society - 2013 21st Annual Scientific Meeting Research Abstracts. Pain Medicine, 14: 1269-1276. doi: 10.1111/pme.12219, 2013.
BACKGROUNDHoy D, March L, Brooks P, Blyth F, Woolf A, Bain C, Williams G, Smith E, Vos T, Barendregt J, Murray C, Burstein R, Buchbinder R. The global burden of low back pain: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jun;73(6):968-74. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204428. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
PMID: 24665116BACKGROUNDFoster TE, Puskas BL, Mandelbaum BR, Gerhardt MB, Rodeo SA. Platelet-rich plasma: from basic science to clinical applications. Am J Sports Med. 2009 Nov;37(11):2259-72. doi: 10.1177/0363546509349921.
PMID: 19875361BACKGROUNDPavlovic V, Ciric M, Jovanovic V, Stojanovic P. Platelet Rich Plasma: a short overview of certain bioactive components. Open Med (Wars). 2016 Aug 12;11(1):242-247. doi: 10.1515/med-2016-0048. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 28352802BACKGROUNDBoswell SG, Cole BJ, Sundman EA, Karas V, Fortier LA. Platelet-rich plasma: a milieu of bioactive factors. Arthroscopy. 2012 Mar;28(3):429-39. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.10.018. Epub 2012 Jan 28.
PMID: 22284405BACKGROUNDBlair P, Flaumenhaft R. Platelet alpha-granules: basic biology and clinical correlates. Blood Rev. 2009 Jul;23(4):177-89. doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2009.04.001. Epub 2009 May 17.
PMID: 19450911BACKGROUNDSanchez AR, Sheridan PJ, Kupp LI. Is platelet-rich plasma the perfect enhancement factor? A current review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003 Jan-Feb;18(1):93-103.
PMID: 12608674BACKGROUNDPeng BG. Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of discogenic low back pain. World J Orthop. 2013 Apr 18;4(2):42-52. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v4.i2.42. Print 2013 Apr 18.
PMID: 23610750BACKGROUNDWang SZ, Rui YF, Tan Q, Wang C. Enhancing intervertebral disc repair and regeneration through biology: platelet-rich plasma as an alternative strategy. Arthritis Res Ther. 2013;15(5):220. doi: 10.1186/ar4353.
PMID: 24165687BACKGROUNDAnitua E, Padilla S. Biologic therapies to enhance intervertebral disc repair. Regen Med. 2018 Jan;13(1):55-72. doi: 10.2217/rme-2017-0111. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
PMID: 29355455BACKGROUNDDavis VL, Abukabda AB, Radio NM, Witt-Enderby PA, Clafshenkel WP, Cairone JV, Rutkowski JL. Platelet-rich preparations to improve healing. Part I: workable options for every size practice. J Oral Implantol. 2014 Aug;40(4):500-10. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-12-00104.
PMID: 25106016BACKGROUNDLi P, Zhang R, Zhou Q. Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma in Retarding Intervertebral Disc Degeneration: A Meta-Analysis of Animal Studies. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:7919201. doi: 10.1155/2017/7919201. Epub 2017 Jul 2.
PMID: 28752097BACKGROUNDGelalis ID, Christoforou G, Charchanti A, Gkiatas I, Pakos E, Papadopoulos D, Ploumis A, Korompilias A. Autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) effect on intervertebral disc restoration: an experimental rabbit model. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2019 Apr;29(3):545-551. doi: 10.1007/s00590-018-2337-1. Epub 2018 Oct 28.
PMID: 30370433BACKGROUNDKhalaf K, Nikkhoo M, Ya-Wen Kuo, Yu-Chun Hsu, Parnianpour M, Campbell-Kyureghyan N, Haghpanahi M, Jaw-Lin Wang. Recovering the mechanical properties of denatured intervertebral discs through Platelet-Rich Plasma therapy. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2015 Aug;2015:933-6. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2015.7318516.
PMID: 26736416BACKGROUNDMarx RE. Platelet-rich plasma: evidence to support its use. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004 Apr;62(4):489-96. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2003.12.003. No abstract available.
PMID: 15085519BACKGROUNDTuakli-Wosornu YA, Terry A, Boachie-Adjei K, Harrison JR, Gribbin CK, LaSalle EE, Nguyen JT, Solomon JL, Lutz GE. Lumbar Intradiskal Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) Injections: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Study. PM R. 2016 Jan;8(1):1-10; quiz 10. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2015.08.010. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
PMID: 26314234BACKGROUNDFujita N, Imai J, Suzuki T, Yamada M, Ninomiya K, Miyamoto K, Iwasaki R, Morioka H, Matsumoto M, Chiba K, Watanabe S, Suda T, Toyama Y, Miyamoto T. Vascular endothelial growth factor-A is a survival factor for nucleus pulposus cells in the intervertebral disc. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008 Jul 25;372(2):367-72. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.05.044. Epub 2008 May 19.
PMID: 18492486BACKGROUNDYazawa M, Ogata H, Nakajima T, Mori T, Watanabe N, Handa M. Basic studies on the clinical applications of platelet-rich plasma. Cell Transplant. 2003;12(5):509-18. doi: 10.3727/000000003108747073.
PMID: 12953925BACKGROUNDEverts PA, Malanga GA, Paul RV, Rothenberg JB, Stephens N, Mautner KR. Assessing clinical implications and perspectives of the pathophysiological effects of erythrocytes and plasma free hemoglobin in autologous biologics for use in musculoskeletal regenerative medicine therapies. A review. Regen Ther. 2019 May 10;11:56-64. doi: 10.1016/j.reth.2019.03.009. eCollection 2019 Dec.
PMID: 31193111BACKGROUNDHussain N, Johal H, Bhandari M. An evidence-based evaluation on the use of platelet rich plasma in orthopedics - a review of the literature. SICOT J. 2017;3:57. doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2017036. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
PMID: 28990574BACKGROUNDSanapati J, Manchikanti L, Atluri S, Jordan S, Albers SL, Pappolla MA, Kaye AD, Candido KD, Pampati V, Hirsch JA. Do Regenerative Medicine Therapies Provide Long-Term Relief in Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis. Pain Physician. 2018 Nov;21(6):515-540.
PMID: 30508983BACKGROUNDvan Hooff ML, Spruit M, Fairbank JC, van Limbeek J, Jacobs WC. The Oswestry Disability Index (version 2.1a): validation of a Dutch language version. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Jan 15;40(2):E83-90. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000683.
PMID: 25575092BACKGROUNDChilds JD, Piva SR, Fritz JM. Responsiveness of the numeric pain rating scale in patients with low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Jun 1;30(11):1331-4. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000164099.92112.29.
PMID: 15928561BACKGROUNDFerreira-Valente MA, Pais-Ribeiro JL, Jensen MP. Validity of four pain intensity rating scales. Pain. 2011 Oct;152(10):2399-2404. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.07.005.
PMID: 21856077BACKGROUNDOstelo RW, Deyo RA, Stratford P, Waddell G, Croft P, Von Korff M, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain: towards international consensus regarding minimal important change. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Jan 1;33(1):90-4. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815e3a10.
PMID: 18165753BACKGROUNDWaterschoot FPC, Dijkstra PU, Hollak N, de Vries HJ, Geertzen JHB, Reneman MF. Dose or content? Effectiveness of pain rehabilitation programs for patients with chronic low back pain: a systematic review. Pain. 2014 Jan;155(1):179-189. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.10.006. Epub 2013 Oct 14.
PMID: 24135435BACKGROUNDNavani A, Manchikanti L, Albers SL, Latchaw RE, Sanapati J, Kaye AD, Atluri S, Jordan S, Gupta A, Cedeno D, Vallejo A, Fellows B, Knezevic NN, Pappolla M, Diwan S, Trescot AM, Soin A, Kaye AM, Aydin SM, Calodney AK, Candido KD, Bakshi S, Benyamin RM, Vallejo R, Watanabe A, Beall D, Stitik TP, Foye PM, Helander EM, Hirsch JA. Responsible, Safe, and Effective Use of Biologics in the Management of Low Back Pain: American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP) Guidelines. Pain Physician. 2019 Jan;22(1S):S1-S74.
PMID: 30717500BACKGROUNDPettine KA, Suzuki RK, Sand TT, Murphy MB. Autologous bone marrow concentrate intradiscal injection for the treatment of degenerative disc disease with three-year follow-up. Int Orthop. 2017 Oct;41(10):2097-2103. doi: 10.1007/s00264-017-3560-9. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
PMID: 28748380BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sheldon E Jordan, M.D.
Neurological Associates of West Los Angeles
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Investigator, care provider, and participant were all blinded to injection contents (e.g., hemocyte autograft intervention vs. placebo control) An independent blinded evaluator assessed subjects at 4 weeks and 8 weeks. An unblinded or blinded evaluator will assess subjects at 26 weeks.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 19, 2019
First Posted
August 22, 2019
Study Start
May 17, 2016
Primary Completion
December 31, 2018
Study Completion
February 18, 2019
Last Updated
December 4, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-12