Efficacy of Intradiscal Injection of Viable Placental Tissue Extract in Subjects With One or Two Level, Symptomatic Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Degeneration
A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled With Crossover Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Intradiscal Injection of Viable Placental Tissue Extract in Subjects With One or Two Level, Symptomatic Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Degeneration
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Dr. Parker (the "Investigator") and Semmes Murphey Foundation ("Foundation") are conducting a study of outcomes and safety associated with degenerative discs at Semmes-Murphey Clinic, P.C. ("Semmes-Murphey"). This study will look at a product that is derived from human tissue, that will be injected into the affected disc. With this study, the investigators hope to find a safe and effective way to treat degenerative disc disease.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 24, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 5, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2016
CompletedNovember 17, 2015
November 1, 2015
2 years
February 24, 2015
November 16, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
• To evaluate the effect on change from baseline compared to Tissue Suspension Solution of intradiscal placental extract (IPE) on lower back pain (VAS).
52 weeks
• To evaluate the effect on change from baseline compared to Tissue Suspension Solution of intradiscal placental extract on disability (ODI).
52 weeks
• To evaluate the effect on change from baseline compared to Tissue Suspension Solution of intradiscal placental extract on quality of life (EQ-5D).
52 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
• Composite outcome measure: Change from baseline and compared to Tissue Suspension Solution in qualitative assessments
52 weeks
Study Arms (2)
injectable placental tissue extract called BioDGenesis
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis study will compare injectable placental tissue extract called BioDGenesis (Active Product)
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORinjectable Tissue Suspension Solution (TSS) (Placebo). The Active Product is supplied by BioD, LLC (BioD).
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The subject must be ≥18 and ≤75 years of age, skeletally mature, and have a BMI ≥18 kg/m2 and ≤30 kg/m2 at Screening.
- The subject must have been experiencing low back pain for at least 6 months prior to Screening.
- The subject must have had low back pain that is unresponsive to at least 3 months of conservative care (non operative treatment), which may include bed rest, anti inflammatory or analgesic medications, chiropractic manipulations, acupuncture, massage, physical therapy or home-directed lumbar exercise programs.
- The subject must have pretreatment (Baseline) low back pain of 30 to 90 mm on the visual analog scale (VAS) at Screening and Baseline.
- The subject must have pretreatment (Baseline) Oswestry Disability Index Questionnaire (ODI) score of 30 to 70 points at Screening and Baseline.
- The subject's target disc must meet the following objective criteria (corresponding to Pfirrman Grade 2 and 3):
- The subject must be willing to voluntarily sign the informed consent form and agree to the release of medical information for purposes of this study (i.e., HIPAA authorization) at Screening.
- The subject must be physically and mentally able to comply with the protocol, able to read and complete the required forms, and willing and able to adhere to the requirements of the protocol.
You may not qualify if:
- The subject has radiculopathy resulting from nerve compression at Screening or Baseline.
- The subject has unilateral or bilateral leg pain with intensity greater than 50% of the intensity of the low back pain as measured on a VAS at Screening or Baseline.
- The subject has cauda equina syndrome at Screening or Baseline (Day 1).
- The subject has greater than 50% loss of disc height when compared to the adjacent superior disc.
- The subject has a significant disc herniation or free fragment of disc material on MRI.
- The subject has current infection at the planned procedure site, active systemic infection, or current or prior history of lumbar spinal infection (i.e., discitis, septic arthritis, epidural abscess) at Baseline.
- The subject has had previous lumbar spine surgery.
- The subject has had previous disc treatment procedures or intradiscal injections. Discography may have been performed, but the procedure must have been done at least 2 weeks or more prior to the injection of study medication.
- The subject has undergone lumbar epidural or transforaminal injections with corticosteroids within the last 3 months.
- The subject has evidence of prior lumbar vertebral body fracture or trauma.
- The subject has evidence of dynamic instability on lumbar flexion extension.
- The subject has Grade 2 or higher spondylolisthesis or spondylolysis at the target disc at Screening.
- The subject has findings of a significant underlying neurological condition (motor strength \<4; sensory assessment abnormal; or reflexes absent or hyperactive with clonus).
- The subject has an active malignancy or tumor.
- The subject has had significant systemic disease, such as unstable angina, autoimmune disease, rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes mellitus, or muscular dystrophy.
- +14 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Western Institutional Review Board® (WIRB®)
Puyallup, Washington, Washington, 98374-2115, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 24, 2015
First Posted
March 5, 2015
Study Start
December 1, 2014
Primary Completion
December 1, 2016
Last Updated
November 17, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-11