Leuven Interactive Scheme for hearingTraining Evaluation, and Audiological Rehabilitation
LUISTER
1 other identifier
interventional
90
1 country
1
Brief Summary
It is believed that persons with hearing impairment benefit from auditory rehabilitation (AR), i.e. regular assessment and training of their listening skills. However, the efficacy of auditory rehabilitation has not been investigated before. In Leuven (Belgium) an e-health app has been developed that enables performance assessment, listening skills training, and counselling for persons with hearing impairment. Currently, an RCT is prepared to evaluate the different modules in persons with hearing impairment. The experimental group will receive auditory rehabilitation training modules, and a control group will either receive training tasks that are NOT believed to transfer to improved listening skills or will not receive any training (passive control).
- 1.Do participants improve on the trained tasks in the LUISTER AR scheme and does this improvement transfer to an improvement in speech perception in noise (primary outcome), executive functioning and/or quality of life (secondary outcomes)?
- 2.Does training with the LUISTER AR scheme provide more benefit on primary and secondary outcomes than a placebo program (active control group) or no training (passive control group)?
- 3.Can improvement in speech in noise perception, obtained with the LUISTER AR scheme, be consolidated until 6 months after training has stopped?
- 4.Are certain user-specific or training-specific aspects correlated to improvement on task-specific learning as well as near- and far transfer
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 10, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 21, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 28, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2024
CompletedFebruary 17, 2023
February 1, 2023
3.7 years
August 10, 2019
February 15, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Speech in noise intelligibility
LIST sentences presented in speech-weighted noise. Participants are required to repeat sentences in noise. The Leuven Intelligibility Sentences Test (LIST, (van Wieringen \& Wouters, 2008)) was specifically designed for speech perception in noise assessment in CI users. The test has a high test-retest reliability and a steep slope making it very sensitive to small improvements in performance. An improvement of 2dB results in a clinically relevant improvement in speech. discrimination in noise. Therefore, the primary endpoint to validate the LUISTER AR scheme will be an improvement of 2dB on speech discrimination in noise.
Change at 16 wks compared to baseline
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Executive functioning inhibition
16 weeks, + 6 months
Executive functioning: task switching
16 weeks, + 6 months
Executive functioning updating
16 weeks, + 6 months
Fluid intelligence
0 weeks, for baseline
Self-reported measure
0 and 16 weeks, + 6 months
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Experimental
EXPERIMENTALParticipants are asked to train (at least) 5 times a week during 15 - 20 mins. The first 4 sessions are training sessions, the fifth session is an in-training test session (DTT and phoneme discrimination).
Placebo
OTHERCI-users: Participants are asked to train (at least) 5 times a week during 15 - 20 mins. The first 4 sessions are training sessions, and the fifth session is an in-training test session (DTT and phoneme discrimination).
Passive Control
PLACEBO COMPARATORHA users: Participants do not receive an intervention.
Interventions
Experimental: tablet-based take-home auditory-cognitive training, which consists of phoneme tasks, words in quiet and in different types of noise
CI-users: Placebo, tablet-based take-home psychophysical tasks, reading (non auditory)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- hearing impaired
- sufficient knowledge of the Dutch language
You may not qualify if:
- cognitively impaired
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuvenlead
- KU Leuvencollaborator
Study Sites (1)
KU Leuven, Experimental ORL, Dept Neurosciences
Leuven, Vlaams Brabant, 3001, Belgium
Related Publications (2)
Magits S, Boon E, De Meyere L, Dierckx A, Vermaete E, Francart T, Verhaert N, Wouters J, van Wieringen A. Comparing the Outcomes of a Personalized Versus Nonpersonalized Home-Based Auditory Training Program for Cochlear Implant Users. Ear Hear. 2023 May-Jun 01;44(3):477-493. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001295. Epub 2022 Oct 29.
PMID: 36534665DERIVEDvan Wieringen A, Wouters J. Lilliput: speech perception in speech-weighted noise and in quiet in young children. Int J Audiol. 2023 Aug;62(8):747-755. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2022.2086491. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
PMID: 35732012DERIVED
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Astrid van Wieringen
KU Leuven
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The participant does not know whether (s)he receives treatment or placebo. The investigator and the outcomes assessor are blind to this information too. The care provide (speech therapist) would know after communication with the participant. In case of the HA-study, participants either receive an intervention or do not receive an intervention. Therefore, they cannot be masked.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 10, 2019
First Posted
August 21, 2019
Study Start
January 1, 2019
Primary Completion
August 28, 2022
Study Completion
April 30, 2024
Last Updated
February 17, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share