PRP Injection Into Anal Sphincters for Fecal Incontinence
The Effect of Platelet Rich Plasma Injection Into the Anal Sphincters on Fecal Incontinence and Quality of Life in Incontinent Patients Had Treated With Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The treatment of fecal incontinence after low anterior resection is problematic, and not always able to increase quality of life. Biofeedback and rehabilitation therapies are harmless and easy to use; thus, generally selected as the initial treatment modalities, however may be effective in a small portion of patients. More complex treatment techniques including sacral nerve stimulation decrease the severity of symptoms, however the implantation of the device is a costly, staged procedure. Little is known about the effectiveness of other techniques such as injectable substances on incontinence observed after low anterior resection. There is no study evaluating the safety and effectiveness of platelet rich plasma (PRP) injection for incontinent patients after low anterior resection.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for early_phase_1
Started May 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 15, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 15, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 21, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 15, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 15, 2021
CompletedAugust 21, 2019
August 1, 2019
1.3 years
August 15, 2019
August 20, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Wexner fecal incontinence score change
This scoring system cross-tabulates frequencies and different anal incontinence presentations (Gas/Liquid/Solid/Pad use/Need for lifestyle alterations) and sums the returned score to a total of 0-20 (where 0 = perfect continence and 20 = complete incontinence). Each of the incontinence presentations is graded equally.
baseline and 6 months after PRP injection
Secondary Outcomes (11)
St Mark's (Vaizey) score
baseline and 6 months after PRP injection
Pescatori incontinence score
baseline and 6 months after PRP injection
Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Questionnaires
baseline and 6 months after PRP injection
SF-36 Questionnairy
baseline and 6 months after PRP injection
Anal resting pressure
baseline and 6 months after PRP injection
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
PRP injection
EXPERIMENTALPRP is prepared using a special device (VS-400, Genesis Comp, Korea). For each application a kit (e+ PRP, Genesis Comp, Korea) will be used. 18 cc of venous blood will be collected from the patient into the syringe with 2 cc of anticoagulant, and will be gently inverted. The sample will be slowly injected into the e+ PRP kit. The kit will be centrifuged under 1,500G for 4 minutes, which will separate the blood components into 3 different layers. The rot at the top of the kit will be pressed until the bottom of the piston will touch the red blood cell layer, and the rot will be turned clockwise to close it. The cap will be opened and the small syringe will be connected to the cap for extracting PRP. The injection will be performed in operation room under general anesthesia with either IV sedation of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) sedation. 10 cc of PRP will be directly injected in external muscles at 8 locations under the guidance of endoanal ultrasound
Interventions
PRP injection into tha anal canal in patients underwent low anterior resection for rectal cancer
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- incontinent patients after low anterior resection for rectal cancer
You may not qualify if:
- A. Patients who will not be suitable for initial tests:
- Patients younger than 18 or older than 80
- Pregnant or lactating women
- Patients received pelvic radiation after the initial cancer surgery
- Patients with local recurrence
- Patients with irresectable metastasis (patients with resectable liver and/or lung metastasis will be included after metastasectomy, but patients with peritoneal metastasis who will be candidate for peritonectomy will not be included)
- Patients under chemotherapy
- Patients confess incontinence prior to initial cancer surgery
- Contraindication for PRP injection: active infection, thrombocytopenia, anemia (Hgb \<10 gr/dl), allergy for buffalo thrombin
- If the interval after the final surgery less than 12 months
- Patient refusal
- B. Patients who will be excluded according to manometer and/or endoanal ultrasound findings. Only the patients with an acceptable volume of healthy anal sphincters, an adequate reservoir capacity of neorectum and decreased sphincter strength will be included to the study after ruling out a full-thickness external sphincter tear will be the subjects of the evaluation. These patients will be excluded prior to PRP injection:
- If manometer reveals normal resting (59-74 mm) and squeeze (124-152 mm) pressure (No clue for decreased sphincter strength)
- If manometer reveals higher than normal volume (17-23 cc) for the first sensation, since it shows reduction of rectal sensitivity
- If manometer reveals lessened maximum tolerable volume (MTV), since the continence may be related to the reduced volume of neorectum (For healthy volunteers the normal level of MTV is between 216 cc and 266 cc. Although normal level for neorectum after low anterior resection is not known, in a study it is accepted to be more than 60 cc as the current study \[28\]).
- +1 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Istanbul Medipol University Medical School
Istanbul, 34214, Turkey (TĂ¼rkiye)
Related Publications (31)
Ziv Y, Zbar A, Bar-Shavit Y, Igov I. Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS): cause and effect and reconstructive considerations. Tech Coloproctol. 2013 Apr;17(2):151-62. doi: 10.1007/s10151-012-0909-3. Epub 2012 Oct 18.
PMID: 23076289BACKGROUNDBryant CL, Lunniss PJ, Knowles CH, Thaha MA, Chan CL. Anterior resection syndrome. Lancet Oncol. 2012 Sep;13(9):e403-8. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70236-X.
PMID: 22935240BACKGROUNDPeeters KC, van de Velde CJ, Leer JW, Martijn H, Junggeburt JM, Kranenbarg EK, Steup WH, Wiggers T, Rutten HJ, Marijnen CA. Late side effects of short-course preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: increased bowel dysfunction in irradiated patients--a Dutch colorectal cancer group study. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Sep 1;23(25):6199-206. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.14.779.
PMID: 16135487BACKGROUNDLundby L, Krogh K, Jensen VJ, Gandrup P, Qvist N, Overgaard J, Laurberg S. Long-term anorectal dysfunction after postoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 Jul;48(7):1343-9; discussion 1349-52; author reply 1352. doi: 10.1007/s10350-005-0049-1.
PMID: 15933797BACKGROUNDRidolfi TJ, Berger N, Ludwig KA. Low Anterior Resection Syndrome: Current Management and Future Directions. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2016 Sep;29(3):239-45. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1584500.
PMID: 27582649BACKGROUNDIshiyama G, Hinata N, Kinugasa Y, Murakami G, Fujimiya M. Nerves supplying the internal anal sphincter: an immunohistochemical study using donated elderly cadavers. Surg Radiol Anat. 2014 Dec;36(10):1033-42. doi: 10.1007/s00276-014-1289-3. Epub 2014 Apr 2.
PMID: 24691518BACKGROUNDKonanz J, Herrle F, Weiss C, Post S, Kienle P. Quality of life of patients after low anterior, intersphincteric, and abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer--a matched-pair analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013 May;28(5):679-88. doi: 10.1007/s00384-013-1683-z. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
PMID: 23571868BACKGROUNDFarouk R, Duthie GS, Lee PW, Monson JR. Endosonographic evidence of injury to the internal anal sphincter after low anterior resection: long-term follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998 Jul;41(7):888-91. doi: 10.1007/BF02235373.
PMID: 9678375BACKGROUNDHirano A, Koda K, Kosugi C, Yamazaki M, Yasuda H. Damage to anal sphincter/levator ani muscles caused by operative procedure in anal sphincter-preserving operation for rectal cancer. Am J Surg. 2011 Apr;201(4):508-13. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.12.016. Epub 2010 Sep 29.
PMID: 20883975BACKGROUNDHo YH, Tsang C, Tang CL, Nyam D, Eu KW, Seow-Choen F. Anal sphincter injuries from stapling instruments introduced transanally: randomized, controlled study with endoanal ultrasound and anorectal manometry. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000 Feb;43(2):169-73. doi: 10.1007/BF02236976.
PMID: 10696889BACKGROUNDTomita R, Igarashi S, Fujisaki S. Studies on anal canal sensitivity in patients with or without soiling after low anterior resection for lower rectal cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 2008 Jul-Aug;55(85):1311-4.
PMID: 18795679BACKGROUNDKim KH, Yu CS, Yoon YS, Yoon SN, Lim SB, Kim JC. Effectiveness of biofeedback therapy in the treatment of anterior resection syndrome after rectal cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011 Sep;54(9):1107-13. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318221a934.
PMID: 21825890BACKGROUNDVisser WS, Te Riele WW, Boerma D, van Ramshorst B, van Westreenen HL. Pelvic floor rehabilitation to improve functional outcome after a low anterior resection: a systematic review. Ann Coloproctol. 2014 Jun;30(3):109-14. doi: 10.3393/ac.2014.30.3.109. Epub 2014 Jun 23.
PMID: 24999460BACKGROUNDTan E, Ngo NT, Darzi A, Shenouda M, Tekkis PP. Meta-analysis: sacral nerve stimulation versus conservative therapy in the treatment of faecal incontinence. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011 Mar;26(3):275-94. doi: 10.1007/s00384-010-1119-y. Epub 2011 Jan 29.
PMID: 21279370BACKGROUNDSchwandner O. Sacral neuromodulation for fecal incontinence and "low anterior resection syndrome" following neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013 May;28(5):665-9. doi: 10.1007/s00384-013-1687-8. Epub 2013 Apr 5.
PMID: 23559414BACKGROUNDSoerensen MM, Lundby L, Buntzen S, Laurberg S. Intersphincteric injected silicone biomaterial implants: a treatment for faecal incontinence. Colorectal Dis. 2009 Jan;11(1):73-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01544.x. Epub 2008 Apr 28.
PMID: 18462216BACKGROUNDKim DW, Yoon HM, Park JS, Kim YH, Kang SB. Radiofrequency energy delivery to the anal canal: is it a promising new approach to the treatment of fecal incontinence? Am J Surg. 2009 Jan;197(1):14-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.11.023. Epub 2008 Jul 9.
PMID: 18614149BACKGROUNDFoster TE, Puskas BL, Mandelbaum BR, Gerhardt MB, Rodeo SA. Platelet-rich plasma: from basic science to clinical applications. Am J Sports Med. 2009 Nov;37(11):2259-72. doi: 10.1177/0363546509349921.
PMID: 19875361BACKGROUNDMishra A, Pavelko T. Treatment of chronic elbow tendinosis with buffered platelet-rich plasma. Am J Sports Med. 2006 Nov;34(11):1774-8. doi: 10.1177/0363546506288850. Epub 2006 May 30.
PMID: 16735582BACKGROUNDPeerbooms JC, Sluimer J, Bruijn DJ, Gosens T. Positive effect of an autologous platelet concentrate in lateral epicondylitis in a double-blind randomized controlled trial: platelet-rich plasma versus corticosteroid injection with a 1-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2010 Feb;38(2):255-62. doi: 10.1177/0363546509355445.
PMID: 20448192BACKGROUNDGosens T, Peerbooms JC, van Laar W, den Oudsten BL. Ongoing positive effect of platelet-rich plasma versus corticosteroid injection in lateral epicondylitis: a double-blind randomized controlled trial with 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2011 Jun;39(6):1200-8. doi: 10.1177/0363546510397173. Epub 2011 Mar 21.
PMID: 21422467BACKGROUNDGottgens KW, Vening W, van der Hagen SJ, van Gemert WG, Smeets RR, Stassen LP, Baeten CG, Breukink SO. Long-term results of mucosal advancement flap combined with platelet-rich plasma for high cryptoglandular perianal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Feb;57(2):223-7. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000023.
PMID: 24401885BACKGROUNDMoreno-Serrano A, Garcia-Diaz JJ, Ferrer-Marquez M, Alarcon-Rodriguez R, Alvarez-Garcia A, Reina-Duarte A. Using autologous platelet-rich plasma for the treatment of complex fistulas. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2016 Mar;108(3):123-8. doi: 10.17235/reed.2016.3946/2015.
PMID: 26856400BACKGROUNDPinheiro CL, Peixinho CC, Esposito CC, Manso JE, Machado JC. Ultrasound biomicroscopy and claudication test for in vivo follow-up of muscle repair enhancement based on platelet-rich plasma therapy in a rat model of gastrocnemius laceration. Acta Cir Bras. 2016 Feb;31(2):103-10. doi: 10.1590/S0102-865020160020000004.
PMID: 26959619BACKGROUNDCong JC, Chen CS, Ma MX, Xia ZX, Liu DS, Zhang FY. Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: comparison of stapled and manual coloanal anastomosis. Colorectal Dis. 2014 May;16(5):353-8. doi: 10.1111/codi.12573.
PMID: 24460588BACKGROUNDHong KD, Kim JS, Ji WB, Um JW. Midterm outcomes of injectable bulking agents for fecal incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tech Coloproctol. 2017 Mar;21(3):203-210. doi: 10.1007/s10151-017-1593-0. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
PMID: 28251356BACKGROUNDFelt-Bersma RJ, Sloots CE, Poen AC, Cuesta MA, Meuwissen SG. Rectal compliance as a routine measurement: extreme volumes have direct clinical impact and normal volumes exclude rectum as a problem. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000 Dec;43(12):1732-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02236859.
PMID: 11156459BACKGROUNDOlsen IP, Augensen K, Wilsgaard T, Kiserud T. Three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound assessment of the anal sphincters during rest and squeeze. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87(6):669-74. doi: 10.1080/00016340802088346.
PMID: 18568467BACKGROUNDGregory WT, Boyles SH, Simmons K, Corcoran A, Clark AL. External anal sphincter volume measurements using 3-dimensional endoanal ultrasound. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 May;194(5):1243-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.10.822. Epub 2006 Apr 21.
PMID: 16647906BACKGROUNDVaizey CJ, Carapeti E, Cahill JA, Kamm MA. Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems. Gut. 1999 Jan;44(1):77-80. doi: 10.1136/gut.44.1.77.
PMID: 9862829BACKGROUNDRullier E, Laurent C, Bretagnol F, Rullier A, Vendrely V, Zerbib F. Sphincter-saving resection for all rectal carcinomas: the end of the 2-cm distal rule. Ann Surg. 2005 Mar;241(3):465-9. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000154551.06768.e1.
PMID: 15729069BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mustafa C Haksal, MD
Istanbul Medipol University Medical School
- STUDY CHAIR
Mustafa Oncel, Prof
Istanbul Medipol University Medical School
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- early phase 1
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 15, 2019
First Posted
August 21, 2019
Study Start
May 15, 2019
Primary Completion
August 15, 2020
Study Completion
February 15, 2021
Last Updated
August 21, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
- Time Frame
- after the final date of the study, for 1 year
- Access Criteria
- related data will be shared with interested clinicians to use the info in their studies and to re-analyse our findings. Contact will be via e-mail of the PI
all IPD that underlie results in a publication