Physiotherapy in Lumbar Disc Pathologies
A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of four physical therapy treatment approaches for lumbar region pathologies. Eighty volunteers who have back pain will be included in the study. Subjects will be randomly divided into four groups; Group 1: Soft tissue mobilisation techniques and stabilization exercises (n=20), Group 2: Kinesiotape and stabilization exercise (n=20), Group 3: Stabilization exercises (n=20), Group 4: Reflexology and stabilization exercises (n=20).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2020
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 17, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 20, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 2, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 2, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 2, 2021
CompletedFebruary 4, 2021
February 1, 2021
5 months
August 17, 2019
February 2, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
pain intensity
All patients will be assessed with the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain intensity at rest, at night and during activity. VAS is a 100-mm line with no marks along it, anchored with the words "no pain" on one side and "the most severe pain" on the other. The subjects were simply instructed to place a mark along the line at a level representing the intensity of their pain.
8weeks
range of motion
Trunk and hip range of motion measurements were taken with a universal goniometer. Active trunk flexion and extension, lateral flexion, and hip flexion and extension will recorded. Hamstring flexibility will be also measured with universal goniometry using the passive 90/90 test. For this test, the patients will be positioned supine, lying on the back, with the knee and hip stabilized at 90° of flexion. The goniometer will be pivoted at the lateral condyle of the femur, and knee extension will be measured in order to determine the loss of the range of motion due to hamstring tightness.
8weeks
muscular strength
All patients were assessed with isokinetic testing for strength at 60°/sec. Isokinetic testing is commonly used for testing and training of patients in clinics. It calculates the muscle power at the full range of motion, providing the opportunity to act at the angular velocity. An IsoMed 2000 (D\&R GmbH, Germany) will be used bilaterally for isokinetic evaluation of hip flexion and abduction at 60°/sec. After proper positioning, the patient will be asked to push the force arm of the system as strongly as possible at this angular velocity in the flexion and abduction directions. The peak torque and total work values will be recorded.
8weeks
Trunk stabilization test
A side-plank position test was used for evaluation of trunk stabilization. The test is one of the most functional stabilization tests and examines trunk strength, endurance and stabilization during synchronized extremity movements. Basically, the lateral core muscles are assessed but oblique abdominal muscles and hip flexors are also examined. Patients are positioned in side lying, with 90° elbow flexion, 60° shoulder abduction, legs extended and whole body aligned. After trial repetition, patients are asked to raise their pelvis off the ground and stay in that position as long as possible without disrupting the smoothness of the motion. The test is finished when the position is disrupted or the patient falls.
8weeks
Functional performance
The functional status will be evaluated with the Oswestry Disability Index. Knowing the symptoms and disabilities of low back pain patients gives us valuable information for planning the treatment process. The Oswestry Disability Index has 10 main topics, namely, pain intensity, self-care, lifting, walking, sitting, standing, sleep quality, sexual function, social life, and traveling. Each section is scored from 0 to 5 points. The degree of disability increases as the score increases.
1hour
Study Arms (4)
Soft tissue mobilization&stabilization exercises
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe following manual therapy techniques will be applied: 1. Soft Tissue Mobilization; 2. Pretzel Maneuvers; 3. Pelvis Backward-Distraction; 4. Trunk Rotation; 5. Multifidus Mobilization; and 6. Piriformis Transverse Friction Massage
Kinesiotape&stabilization exercises
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe Kinesio® Taping muscle technique, with 10-25% of the stretch of the tape, will be applied to the sacrospinalis, quadratus lumborum, gluteus medius/maximus and piriformis muscles, based on the the weakness that patient's muscles had. Factors interfering with tape adhesion, such as sweat or hair, will be removed before the application. The tape can stay in place for 3-5 days due to its water resistant and breathable properties
Stabilization exercises
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe core stabilization exercise treatment program consisted of the following exercises: a posterior pelvic tilt exercise, lower abdominal muscle isometric strengthening, hip adductor muscle isometric strengthening, lumbar stabilization exercises with a Swiss ball, upper and lower abdominal muscle strengthening exercises with a Swiss ball, oblique abdominal muscle strengthening exercises with a Swiss ball, quadratus lumborum muscle stretching with a Swiss ball, back extensor muscle strengthening exercises with a Swiss ball, a slump exercise (sciatic nerve stretching), lumbar lordosis exercises with a Swiss ball, bridge exercises with a Swiss ball, single leg bridge exercises on a Swiss ball, posture exercises, push-up exercises with a Swiss ball, and squat exercises with a Swiss ball
Reflex therapy&Stabilization exercises
ACTIVE COMPARATORMobilization of each vertebra and pulls were applied from the medial side of the toe to the medial malleolus and to the heel by hand or with the help of an apparatus, including the cervical, thoracic and lumbar spine reflex zones. Finally, the procedure was finished by making a V-shaped maneuver with a thumb in the direction of spinal nerve exits.
Interventions
Visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain intensity, goniometric measurements for the range of motion and hamstring flexibility, the sit and reach test for flexibility, an isokinetic evaluation for strength at 60°/sec, and a side-plank position test for trunk stabilization were measured. The functional status was evaluated with the Oswestry Disability Index. All groups were assessed at the beginning, after a four-week treatment and four weeks of follow-up.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The participants between the ages of 25 and 55 years,
- Having a minimum pain level (at activity) of 3 out of 10 on visual analog scale
- Having low back pain for at least 3 months with lumbar disc pathology (bulging or protrusion) diagnosed by clinical tests and magnetic resonance imaging.
You may not qualify if:
- sacroiliac and lumbar degenerative pathologies,
- another pathology related to neurological deficits,
- physiotherapy previously received for at least 12 months,
- any surgery affecting the lumbar region.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Anima Rapha Center
Ankara, 06770, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (3)
Standaert CJ, Weinstein SM, Rumpeltes J. Evidence-informed management of chronic low back pain with lumbar stabilization exercises. Spine J. 2008 Jan-Feb;8(1):114-20. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.10.015.
PMID: 18164459RESULTBurns SA, Cleland JA, Rivett DA, Snodgrass SJ. Effectiveness of physical therapy interventions for low back pain targeting the low back only or low back plus hips: a randomized controlled trial protocol. Braz J Phys Ther. 2018 Sep-Oct;22(5):424-430. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2018.08.014. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
PMID: 30217693RESULTBurns SA, Cleland JA, Cook CE, Bade M, Rivett DA, Snodgrass S. Variables Describing Individuals With Improved Pain and Function With a Primary Complaint of Low Back Pain: A Secondary Analysis. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2018 Jul-Aug;41(6):467-474. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2017.11.006. Epub 2018 Aug 9.
PMID: 30100096RESULT
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Yesim Sardan Cetinkaya, MD
Guven Health Group
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PROFESSOR, PT.PH.D.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 17, 2019
First Posted
August 20, 2019
Study Start
September 2, 2020
Primary Completion
February 2, 2021
Study Completion
February 2, 2021
Last Updated
February 4, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share