NCT04061187

Brief Summary

The aim of the study is to analyse if live video as a supplement to emergency calls can improve medical dispatchers' situation awareness and enhance the assistance they provide including provision of pre-hospital resources. Focus will also be on evaluating the unconscious patient and improve CPR quality. The general experience from the medical dispatcher and the person calling the emergency number regarding the feasibility of adding live video will also be analysed.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
700

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2018

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2018

Completed
11 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 14, 2019

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 19, 2019

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

September 14, 2021

Status Verified

September 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

August 14, 2019

Last Update Submit

September 7, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

DispatcherDispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitationEmergency callLive video

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (9)

  • Changed emergency response after adding live video to the emergency call

    Did the medical dispatcher change emergency response more often after live video was added to the emergency call compared to emergency calls without video.

    From the beginning of the emergency call to the end of the call. Approx. 6-7 minutes

  • The medical dispatcher's evaluations of the patient after adding live video footage to the emergency call.

    Did the medical dispatcher's evaluation of the patient change because of the live video footage? (ANSWER: Yes, patient more critical ill/ Yes, less critical ill/ or no change) Did the patient suffer another trauma/disease compared to what the medical dispatcher thought before the live video footage? (ANSWER: No/Yes (describe)).

    From the beginning of the emergency call to the end of the call. Approx. 6-7 minutes

  • The medical dispatcher's evaluations of the patient's level of consciousness before and after adding live video footage to the emergency call.

    The medical dispatcher evaluate the patient's level of consciousness before and after the live video footage; AVPU scale (an acronym from "alert, verbal, pain, unresponsive") /or inaccessible.

    From the beginning of the emergency call to the end of the call. Approx. 6-7 minutes.

  • The medical dispatcher's evaluations of the surroundings and bystander response after adding live video footage to the emergency call.

    Did the medical dispatcher situation's awareness regarding the surroundings or bystander response change after video footage? (ANSWER: No/ Yes, Less bystanders present/ Yes, more bystanders present/ Yes, bystander response were more sufficient/ Yes, bystander response were less sufficient/Yes, surroundings were different(describe)/ other (describe)).

    From the beginning of the emergency call to the end of the call. Approx. 6-7 minutes.

  • The medical dispatcher's evaluations of the usefulness of adding live video footage to the emergency call.

    Was the live video footage useful for the medical dispatcher"? (ANSWER: Extremely useful/ very useful/ moderately useful/ slightly useful/ not at all useful).

    From the beginning of the emergency call to the end of the call. Approx. 6-7 minutes.

  • Change in emergency level after adding live video footage to the emergency call.

    Did the medical dispatcher change emergency priority level because of the live video footage?" (ANSWER: No, Yes (upgrade, downgrade))

    Evaluated at the end of the emergency call.

  • Change in the CPR quality (hand position) before the medical dispatcher assist in CPR using the video footage (video-DA-CPR) and after the medical dispatcher has assisted .

    Correct hand position before and after video-DA-CPR? (Outcome: yes / no / inaccessible evaluated before and after video-DA-CPR)

    From the medical dispatcher receive video footage until the end of video-DA-CPR.

  • Change in the CPR quality (compressions rate) before and after video-DA-CPR.

    Correct compressions rate (100-120 compressions/min) before and after video-DA-CPR (Outcome: yes / no / inaccessible evaluated before and after video-DA-CPR)

    From the medical dispatcher receive video footage until the end of video-DA-CPR.

  • Change in the CPR quality (compressions depth) before and after video-DA-CPR

    Correct compressions depth before and after video-DA-CPR (approximately one third of the anterior-posterior diameter). (Outcome: yes / no / inaccessible evaluated before and after video-DA-CPR)

    From the medical dispatcher receive video footage until the end of video-DA-CPR.

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • "Hands-of-time" during CPR

    From the medical dispatcher receive video footage until the end of the call. Approx. 5-6 minutes.

  • Ventilations performed by bystanders?

    From the medical dispatcher receive video footage until the end of video-DA-CPR.

  • Shift of persons during CPR

    From the medical dispatcher receive video footage until the end of the call. Approx. 5-6 minutes.

  • Use of AED

    From the medical dispatcher receive video footage until the end of the call. Approx. 5-6 minutes.

  • Other aspects of bystander CPR

    From the medical dispatcher receive video footage until the end of the call. Approx. 5-6 minutes.

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Emergency medical dispatchers in Copenhagen who added live video footage to the emergency call

You may qualify if:

  • Emergency call about suspected cardiac arrest where CPR is provided
  • Emergency call about a patient with trauma/illness where the medical dispatcher thinks it will be a benefit with live video footage
  • Video-capable smartphone present
  • Caller by the patient's side
  • Caller expected age≥ 18 years
  • More than two bystanders present

You may not qualify if:

  • If caller, patient or other bystanders do not want livestreaming to be added to the emergency call.
  • No video-capable smartphone present
  • Caller not by the patient's side
  • Caller a child
  • Less than two bystanders present

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Copenhagen Emergency Medical Services

Copenhagen, Ballerup, 2750, Denmark

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Out-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestEmergenciesUnconsciousness

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Heart ArrestHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesDisease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsConsciousness DisordersNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Freddy K. Lippert, MD, CEO

    Copenhagen Emergency Medical Services

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Fredrik Folke, MD, PhD

    Copenhagen Emergency Medical Services

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Christian S. Meyhoff, MD, PhD

    Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Denmark

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Doris Øestergaard, MD, Prof.

    Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation, Denmark.

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Gitte Linderoth, MD

    Copenhagen Emergency Medical Services

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE ONLY
Time Perspective
OTHER
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 14, 2019

First Posted

August 19, 2019

Study Start

October 1, 2018

Primary Completion

March 1, 2020

Study Completion

March 1, 2020

Last Updated

September 14, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations