Livestreaming From Smartphones as a Supplement to Emergency Calls
1 other identifier
observational
700
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of the study is to analyse if live video as a supplement to emergency calls can improve medical dispatchers' situation awareness and enhance the assistance they provide including provision of pre-hospital resources. Focus will also be on evaluating the unconscious patient and improve CPR quality. The general experience from the medical dispatcher and the person calling the emergency number regarding the feasibility of adding live video will also be analysed.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Oct 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 14, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 19, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2020
CompletedSeptember 14, 2021
September 1, 2021
1.4 years
August 14, 2019
September 7, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (9)
Changed emergency response after adding live video to the emergency call
Did the medical dispatcher change emergency response more often after live video was added to the emergency call compared to emergency calls without video.
From the beginning of the emergency call to the end of the call. Approx. 6-7 minutes
The medical dispatcher's evaluations of the patient after adding live video footage to the emergency call.
Did the medical dispatcher's evaluation of the patient change because of the live video footage? (ANSWER: Yes, patient more critical ill/ Yes, less critical ill/ or no change) Did the patient suffer another trauma/disease compared to what the medical dispatcher thought before the live video footage? (ANSWER: No/Yes (describe)).
From the beginning of the emergency call to the end of the call. Approx. 6-7 minutes
The medical dispatcher's evaluations of the patient's level of consciousness before and after adding live video footage to the emergency call.
The medical dispatcher evaluate the patient's level of consciousness before and after the live video footage; AVPU scale (an acronym from "alert, verbal, pain, unresponsive") /or inaccessible.
From the beginning of the emergency call to the end of the call. Approx. 6-7 minutes.
The medical dispatcher's evaluations of the surroundings and bystander response after adding live video footage to the emergency call.
Did the medical dispatcher situation's awareness regarding the surroundings or bystander response change after video footage? (ANSWER: No/ Yes, Less bystanders present/ Yes, more bystanders present/ Yes, bystander response were more sufficient/ Yes, bystander response were less sufficient/Yes, surroundings were different(describe)/ other (describe)).
From the beginning of the emergency call to the end of the call. Approx. 6-7 minutes.
The medical dispatcher's evaluations of the usefulness of adding live video footage to the emergency call.
Was the live video footage useful for the medical dispatcher"? (ANSWER: Extremely useful/ very useful/ moderately useful/ slightly useful/ not at all useful).
From the beginning of the emergency call to the end of the call. Approx. 6-7 minutes.
Change in emergency level after adding live video footage to the emergency call.
Did the medical dispatcher change emergency priority level because of the live video footage?" (ANSWER: No, Yes (upgrade, downgrade))
Evaluated at the end of the emergency call.
Change in the CPR quality (hand position) before the medical dispatcher assist in CPR using the video footage (video-DA-CPR) and after the medical dispatcher has assisted .
Correct hand position before and after video-DA-CPR? (Outcome: yes / no / inaccessible evaluated before and after video-DA-CPR)
From the medical dispatcher receive video footage until the end of video-DA-CPR.
Change in the CPR quality (compressions rate) before and after video-DA-CPR.
Correct compressions rate (100-120 compressions/min) before and after video-DA-CPR (Outcome: yes / no / inaccessible evaluated before and after video-DA-CPR)
From the medical dispatcher receive video footage until the end of video-DA-CPR.
Change in the CPR quality (compressions depth) before and after video-DA-CPR
Correct compressions depth before and after video-DA-CPR (approximately one third of the anterior-posterior diameter). (Outcome: yes / no / inaccessible evaluated before and after video-DA-CPR)
From the medical dispatcher receive video footage until the end of video-DA-CPR.
Secondary Outcomes (6)
"Hands-of-time" during CPR
From the medical dispatcher receive video footage until the end of the call. Approx. 5-6 minutes.
Ventilations performed by bystanders?
From the medical dispatcher receive video footage until the end of video-DA-CPR.
Shift of persons during CPR
From the medical dispatcher receive video footage until the end of the call. Approx. 5-6 minutes.
Use of AED
From the medical dispatcher receive video footage until the end of the call. Approx. 5-6 minutes.
Other aspects of bystander CPR
From the medical dispatcher receive video footage until the end of the call. Approx. 5-6 minutes.
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Eligibility Criteria
Emergency medical dispatchers in Copenhagen who added live video footage to the emergency call
You may qualify if:
- Emergency call about suspected cardiac arrest where CPR is provided
- Emergency call about a patient with trauma/illness where the medical dispatcher thinks it will be a benefit with live video footage
- Video-capable smartphone present
- Caller by the patient's side
- Caller expected age≥ 18 years
- More than two bystanders present
You may not qualify if:
- If caller, patient or other bystanders do not want livestreaming to be added to the emergency call.
- No video-capable smartphone present
- Caller not by the patient's side
- Caller a child
- Less than two bystanders present
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Copenhagen Emergency Medical Services
Copenhagen, Ballerup, 2750, Denmark
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Freddy K. Lippert, MD, CEO
Copenhagen Emergency Medical Services
- STUDY CHAIR
Fredrik Folke, MD, PhD
Copenhagen Emergency Medical Services
- STUDY CHAIR
Christian S. Meyhoff, MD, PhD
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Denmark
- STUDY CHAIR
Doris Øestergaard, MD, Prof.
Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation, Denmark.
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Gitte Linderoth, MD
Copenhagen Emergency Medical Services
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- OTHER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 14, 2019
First Posted
August 19, 2019
Study Start
October 1, 2018
Primary Completion
March 1, 2020
Study Completion
March 1, 2020
Last Updated
September 14, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share