NCT04058977

Brief Summary

Patients surviving critical illness experience significant skeletal muscle dysfunction and weakness. Muscle atrophy suffered during critical illness has a long-term impact on the functionality and mobility of these individuals. As a result, individuals surviving critical illness have a significant reduction in quality of life, even up to 5 years post discharge. Research including large randomized controls demonstrates that rehabilitation focused on active mobilization may positively influence patient outcomes. Thus, early mobilization is an important intervention that has many purported benefits. Current rehabilitation practice in the intensive care unit (ICU) and recommendations from clinical practice guidelines such as the Society of Critical Care Medicine, PADIS Guidelines support these interventions to reduce the detrimental effects of immobilization during critical illness. Early mobilization is routinely thought of as standard of care for patients admitted for acute respiratory distress syndrome and sepsis. However, a significant number of recent randomized controlled trials implementing early rehabilitation and mobilization interventions fail to demonstrate immediate or long-term benefits.10,11,18,19 Interesting, active mobilization and rehabilitation analyzed in systematic review had no impact on mortality and "no consistent effects of function, quality of life and ICU or hospital length of stay."18 There are a few potential explanations for interventions not leading to reduction in impairment or functional benefit. Scientific Premise: From our preliminary data (Figure 1) and my clinical experience, a significant cause of the physical impairments in these patients is reductions in muscular power. Muscular power is a critical determinant of functional mobility.20 Preliminary data demonstrate that lower extremity muscle power is significantly reduced in this population and furthermore, these deficits are strongly correlated to physical function. Muscle power training is a potential therapeutic intervention that could lead to more robust improvements in physical function. This concept has been explored extensively in community-dwelling older adults. A recent systematic review of controlled trials demonstrates that power training is superior to traditional resistance training at improving functional performance when comparing the two training modalities.21 Furthermore, power training is feasible for older adults and clinical populations of Parkinson's Disease, Stroke, and frailty.22-27 Thus the feasibility and pragmatic nature of power training is not a concern. Of interest, a randomized controlled trial was completed in institutionalized frail nonagenarians (\>85 years or older).27 In this study, no patients drop-out of study due to power training and significant benefits in function were achieved.27 Therefore, the investigators propose a interventional trial to study the effect of a standardized muscle power training program for patients admitted to the ICU for critical illness.

Trial Health

30
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2021

Typical duration for phase_1

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
withdrawn

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 14, 2019

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 16, 2019

Completed
2.3 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2021

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2023

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

October 28, 2020

Status Verified

October 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

1.8 years

First QC Date

August 14, 2019

Last Update Submit

October 26, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Short Performance Physical Battery

    This outcome measure is scored from 0-12 with lower scores representing disability and higher scores representing better physical function. This test has three components including balance, chair rise time, and habitual gait speed. There is a pre-defined scoring system with participants scoring 0-4 on each test, higher representing better function. These individual components can then be further analysed based on continuous variables of five repetitions of chair rise and habitual 4-meter gait speed. Faster times to complete the the chair-rise test and faster gait speed represents better physical function.

    6-month follow-up

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Quality of life: Eq-5D

    6-month follow-up

  • Six minute walk test (6-mwt)

    6-month follow-up

Study Arms (2)

Power training

EXPERIMENTAL

Randomized to early power training with standardized exercise progression plus standard of care

Other: Power training

Standard of Care

NO INTERVENTION

Standard of care

Interventions

Progressive exercise protocol with focus on velocity of movement

Power training

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 99 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • admitted to medicine ICU
  • acute respiratory failure or ARDS
  • sepsis
  • anticipated \>48 hours MV

You may not qualify if:

  • acute neurologic infarct
  • non-ambulatory prior to hospitalization
  • pregnant

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Kentucky

Lexington, Kentucky, 40536, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Critical IllnessMuscular AtrophyAsthenia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Disease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsNeuromuscular ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesAtrophyPathological Conditions, AnatomicalSigns and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Kirby P Mayer, DPT

    University of Kentucky

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
0

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 1
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Personnel performing outcomes will be blinded to study group
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Graduate Research Assistant

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 14, 2019

First Posted

August 16, 2019

Study Start

December 1, 2021

Primary Completion

September 1, 2023

Study Completion

September 1, 2024

Last Updated

October 28, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Following completion of the proposed experiments, data sharing will be accomplished in a timely fashion via dissemination through publications in peer-reviewed journals and through presentations at national and international meetings.

Locations