Code Status Video in the Intensive Care Unit: Video Assisted Patient Education
Pilot Study to Determine Effectiveness and Acceptance of a Code Status Video in the ICU
1 other identifier
interventional
208
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a single-center, randomized control trial of a code status video as an educational tool in the intensive care unit. Subjects are stratified by patient or surrogate and are randomized to either watch an educational video on code status or not watch the video. They are then asked knowledge base questions regarding code status as well as questions pertaining to comfort regarding code status. Participants randomized to watch the video are also asked questions related to acceptance of the video.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_1
Started Nov 2010
Typical duration for phase_1
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 31, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 4, 2016
CompletedMay 13, 2016
April 1, 2016
2.6 years
January 31, 2012
August 22, 2015
April 7, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
12 Question Resuscitation Status Survey (Question 4 Has 4 Sub-questions)
12 question (question 4 has 4 sub-questions) survey previously validated to determine knowledge level about resuscitation status with total score on the scale of 0-15. Possible scores ranged from 0 to 15, with higher scores representing increased medical knowledge. The CPR knowledge survey assesses a participants basic understanding of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The survey consisted of 12 questions with one point being awarded for each correct response. Question four had a total of four possible correct answers. Thus the scores on the scale of 0-15 points is designed, with higher scores representing increased knowledge.
after admission to ICU, approx one hour
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Participant Reported Comfort With Video Intervention
immediately after intervention
Perception of Utility of Video
immediately after intervention
Willingness to Recommend Video to Other Patients
immediately after intervention
Study Arms (2)
No Video - Control
NO INTERVENTIONThis group does not watch the 10 minute "code status" video before having the knowledge base video administered.
Code Status Video
EXPERIMENTALThis group views a 10 minute video about "code status" prior to knowledge base survey administration
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients ages 18 and older admitted to the medical intensive care unit
You may not qualify if:
- Institutionalized status (prisoners)
- Pregnancy
- A priori decided comfort care measures
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Mayo Cliniclead
Study Sites (1)
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
Related Publications (4)
Hofmann JC, Wenger NS, Davis RB, Teno J, Connors AF Jr, Desbiens N, Lynn J, Phillips RS. Patient preferences for communication with physicians about end-of-life decisions. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preference for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment. Ann Intern Med. 1997 Jul 1;127(1):1-12. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-127-1-199707010-00001.
PMID: 9214246BACKGROUNDWenger NS, Phillips RS, Teno JM, Oye RK, Dawson NV, Liu H, Califf R, Layde P, Hakim R, Lynn J. Physician understanding of patient resuscitation preferences: insights and clinical implications. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000 May;48(S1):S44-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb03140.x.
PMID: 10809456BACKGROUNDTeno JM, Hakim RB, Knaus WA, Wenger NS, Phillips RS, Wu AW, Layde P, Connors AF Jr, Dawson NV, Lynn J. Preferences for cardiopulmonary resuscitation: physician-patient agreement and hospital resource use. The SUPPORT Investigators. J Gen Intern Med. 1995 Apr;10(4):179-86. doi: 10.1007/BF02600252.
PMID: 7790978BACKGROUNDvon Gunten CF, Ferris FD, Emanuel LL. The patient-physician relationship. Ensuring competency in end-of-life care: communication and relational skills. JAMA. 2000 Dec 20;284(23):3051-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.23.3051.
PMID: 11122596BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
In this study the patient outcomes were not addressed as the primary outcome was patient and family knowledge of CPR.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Kianoush Kashani; Principal Investigator
- Organization
- Mayo Clinic
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kianoush B Kashani, MD
Mayo Clinic
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 31, 2012
First Posted
June 1, 2012
Study Start
November 1, 2010
Primary Completion
June 1, 2013
Study Completion
June 1, 2013
Last Updated
May 13, 2016
Results First Posted
April 4, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-04