KT Intervention to Increase Use of Outcome Measures
Knowledge Broker Facilitated Intervention to Increase Use of Outcome Measures by Physical Therapists
1 other identifier
interventional
18
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Knowledge brokers can facilitate knowledge translation (KT) interventions to improve the use of outcome measures by physical therapists. Following the Knowledge-to-Action cycle, a knowledge broker (a researcher who facilitates the translation of knowledge in the local context) will: (1) complete a barrier assessment, (2) develop and implement a tailored multi-modal intervention and (3) determine the outcome. The KB will determine the barriers and facilitators to using outcome measures by PTs who work in inpatient rehabilitation and design a locally tailored KT intervention with input from the key stakeholders (PTs). This cluster randomized trial will compare two active interventions with full or partial supported implementation by a knowledge broker using a cluster randomized trial (randomization will occur by site) to determine the impact on the PTs and patients. Aim 1: Determine if the KT intervention designed and implemented by a KB will increase PTs the use of a selected standardized assessment as compared to an intervention that is designed but not implemented by the KB. Hypothesis1a: Physical therapists use (documented and self-reported) of a selected standardized assessment will improve to a significantly greater extent immediately following the intervention designed and implemented by a KB compared to the partially supported group. Hypothesis1b: Physical therapists in the fully supported group will retain the use of the standardized assessment to a significantly greater extent at 6 month follow-up. Aim 2: Explore and compare both groups of physical therapists satisfaction and concerns with each KT intervention on standardized assessment use. Hypothesis 2: The physical therapists in the fully supported group will express greater satisfaction with the KT intervention and identify fewer barriers for implementing the standardized assessment in practice as compared to the partially supported group immediately after and retained at 6 month follow-up. Aim 3: Explore and compare the patients' experience who were seen by therapists in the fully and partially supported group Hypothesis 3: Patients who were treated by clinicians in the fully supported group will demonstrate an understanding of the patient standardized assessment, why it's relevant to complete the test, and how the information gathered from the standardized assessment can be used to guide the plan of care.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2016
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 15, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 4, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 4, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 6, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 9, 2019
CompletedDecember 17, 2020
December 1, 2020
11 months
August 6, 2019
December 15, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Physical therapist documentation of Standardized Assessment (outcome measures) in patient charts
Chart Audit Data to identify documented usage of selected outcome measures. Chart audits will determine if participant documented in a patient chart, if the outcome measure should have been documented and if it was documented to create proportions at initial evaluation and discharge for each site.
10 months
Perception of intervention
Focus Group Data to Determine PT perception of intervention
10 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
patient perception of outcome measures
4 months
Goal Attainment Scale
10 months
Study Arms (2)
Fully Supported Group
EXPERIMENTALMeetings with knowledge broker 6 times over 10 months to design and implement knowledge translation intervention. Intervention consisted of audit and feedback, goal setting, education, reminders, documentation changes, and KB support.
Partially Supported Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORMeetings with knowledge broker 4 times over 10 months to design and partially implement knowledge translation intervention. Group meets 2 additional times without knowledge broker to self implement intervention. Intervention consisted of audit and feedback, goal setting and documentation changes. Group self implemented education and reminders.
Interventions
Tailored knowledge translation intervention that included barrier assessment and intervention mapping using the theoretical domains framework and participant engagement either fully or partially supported by the knowledge broker.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Physical therapists who work on the musculoskeletal teams at Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation. PTs who work over 20 hours per week.
- Patients who are discharged from Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation and were treated by the PTs who participated in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- PTs who are unable to attend the focus group and intervention.
- Patients with co-morbid neurological diseases that would impact cognitive ability. People with an ongoing relationship with the treating physical therapist.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Rutgers Universitylead
- Kessler Institute for Rehabilitationcollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Rutgers
Newark, New Jersey, 07107, United States
Kessler Institue for Rehabilitation
Saddle Brook, New Jersey, 07663, United States
Related Publications (2)
Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB, Straus SE, Tetroe J, Caswell W, Robinson N. Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map? J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006 Winter;26(1):13-24. doi: 10.1002/chp.47.
PMID: 16557505BACKGROUNDDamschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009 Aug 7;4:50. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-50.
PMID: 19664226BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Wendy Romney, DPT
Rutgers
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Judith E Deustch, PhD
Rutgers
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Irene Ward, PT
Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Primary Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 6, 2019
First Posted
August 9, 2019
Study Start
September 15, 2016
Primary Completion
August 4, 2017
Study Completion
August 4, 2017
Last Updated
December 17, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Data set too small