CMO Letter to Reduce Inappropriate Antibiotic Prescribing Winter 2019/2020
A Letter From the CMO in England to Reduce Antibiotic Prescribing in General Practice: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Monitoring and Feedback (With and Without Graphs), and Social Norms Feedback (Without and Without a Specific Case Study of Patient Harm)
1 other identifier
interventional
2,963
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This trial aims to reduce inappropriate prescription of antibiotics and broad spectrum antibiotics by general practitioners (GPs) in England. Unnecessary prescriptions are defined as those that do not improve patient health outcomes. The intervention is to send GPs a letter from the Chief Medical Officer (CMO) that gives feedback on their practice's prescribing levels. There will be three intervention samples:
- 1.practices whose prescribing in the past year was under the new target of 0.965 items per STAR-PU but who would exceed the target if they had a 5% increase in prescribing; trial compares prescribing of practices whose GPs receive a letter informing them that their practice's prescribing is just under the new target to that of practices that are not sent a letter
- 2.Practices whose prescribing in the past year was above the new target but who not in the top 20% of prescribers; trial compares prescribing of practices whose GPs receive a letter informing them that their practice's prescribing exceeds the new target to practices who get a letter that includes a graph showing their prescribing relative to the target and to practices that are not sent a letter
- 3.Practices that are currently in the top 20% of prescribers; trial compares effect on prescribing of a feedback letter with a social norms message (current standard practice for this group) to a letter informing GPs that their practice's prescribing exceeds the new target and to a letter with a social norms message, that includes a specific example of a case of patient harm caused by antimicrobial resistance.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Aug 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 7, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 9, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 31, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 30, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 30, 2020
CompletedSeptember 29, 2020
September 1, 2020
1 year
August 7, 2019
September 28, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (8)
Total antibiotic prescribing in September
antibiotic prescribing weighted by Specific Therapeutic group Age-sex Related Prescribing Unit (STAR-PU)
1 month
Total antibiotic prescribing in October
antibiotic prescribing weighted by Specific Therapeutic group Age-sex Related Prescribing Unit (STAR-PU)
2 months
Total antibiotic prescribing in November
antibiotic prescribing weighted by Specific Therapeutic group Age-sex Related Prescribing Unit (STAR-PU)
3 months
Total antibiotic prescribing in December
antibiotic prescribing weighted by Specific Therapeutic group Age-sex Related Prescribing Unit (STAR-PU)
4 months
Total antibiotic prescribing in January
antibiotic prescribing weighted by Specific Therapeutic group Age-sex Related Prescribing Unit (STAR-PU)
5 months
Total antibiotic prescribing in February
antibiotic prescribing weighted by Specific Therapeutic group Age-sex Related Prescribing Unit (STAR-PU)
6 months
Total antibiotic prescribing in from September-February
antibiotic prescribing weighted by Specific Therapeutic group Age-sex Related Prescribing Unit (STAR-PU)
6 months
Proportion of practices in each group whose prescribing was under the target
Whether antibiotic prescribing weighted by Specific Therapeutic group Age-sex Related Prescribing Unit (STAR-PU) for April 2019-March 2020 is under the NHS target of 0.965 items per STAR-PU
8 months
Study Arms (8)
Just under target control
NO INTERVENTIONPractices whose prescribing in the past year was under the new target but who would exceed the target if they had a 5% increase in prescribing; no letter sent.
Just under target letter
EXPERIMENTALPractices whose prescribing in the past year was under the new target but who would exceed the target if they had a 5% increase in prescribing: receive a letter informing of this. Randomization is stratified according to whether their prescribing had increased by \> 5% compared to the previous year; those whose prescribing had increased had it mentioned in the letter
Over target control
NO INTERVENTIONPractices whose prescribing in the past year was above the new target but who were not in the top 20% of prescribers; no letter sent * Intervention 1: Letter informing them that their practice's prescribing exceeds the new target (Letter B1) * Intervention 2: Letter informing them that their practice's prescribing exceeds the new target with a graph representing prescribing relative to the target (Letter B2)
Over target letter
EXPERIMENTALPractices whose prescribing in the past year was above the new target but who were not in the top 20% of prescribers; receive a letter informing them that their practice's prescribing exceeds the new target (Letter B1) Randomization is stratified according to whether their prescribing had increased by \> 5% compared to the previous year; those whose prescribing had increased had it mentioned in the letter
Over target letter with bar chart
EXPERIMENTALPractices whose prescribing in the past year was above the new target but who were not in the top 20% of prescribers; receive a letter informing them that their practice's prescribing exceeds the new target, including a bar chart showing their prescribing compared to the target (Letter B1) Randomization is stratified according to whether their prescribing had increased by \> 5% compared to the previous year; those whose prescribing had increased had it mentioned in the letter
Top 20% feedback letter control
ACTIVE COMPARATORTargeting practices that are currently in the top 20% of prescribers; letters informing them of the percentile they are on--standard practice--(Letter C1) Randomization is stratified according to whether their prescribing had increased by \> 5% compared to the previous year; those whose prescribing had increased had it mentioned in the letter
Top 20% above target letter
EXPERIMENTALTargeting practices that are currently in the top 20% of prescribers; letters informing them that their prescribing exceeds the new target (Letter C2) Randomization is stratified according to whether their prescribing had increased by \> 5% compared to the previous year; those whose prescribing had increased had it mentioned in the letter.
Top 20% feedback letter with specific example of patient harm
EXPERIMENTALTargeting practices that are currently in the top 20% of prescribers • Control: Current standard practice, a social norms message, that their practice is in the top 20% of prescribers (Letter C1) Targeting practices that are currently in the top 20% of prescribers; letters informing them of the percentile they are on with a specific example of a case of patient harm caused by antimicrobial resistance (Letter C3) Randomization is stratified according to whether their prescribing had increased by \> 5% compared to the previous year; those whose prescribing had increased had it mentioned in the letter.
Interventions
Letters sent to GPs in relevant practices (prescribing data is by practice, so the practice is the unit of randomization)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- GP practices that prescribed more than 0.919 Antibacterial Items/STAR- PU (5% under the target of 0.965) for the twelve months April 2018 - March 2019
You may not qualify if:
- Practices in the 99th percentile of prescribers
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Public Health England
London, SE1, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 7, 2019
First Posted
August 9, 2019
Study Start
August 31, 2019
Primary Completion
August 30, 2020
Study Completion
August 30, 2020
Last Updated
September 29, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Note that the trial will use publicly available prescribing data, so any researcher should be able to access it.