Comparison of Conservative and Operative Treatment of Jones Fracture
2 other identifiers
interventional
27
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The study deals with the topic of treatment of Jones fracture, comparing surgical and conservative approach. The fracture occurs especially in highly active individuals.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2006
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 26, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 30, 2019
CompletedJuly 31, 2019
July 1, 2019
6 years
July 26, 2019
July 30, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
The American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score - 6 weeks
The improvement in The American Orthopaedic Foot \& Ankle Society (AOFAS) score from the baseline was observed at 6 weeks after injury on a scale of 0-100.
6 weeks
AOFAS score - 12 months
The improvement in The American Orthopaedic Foot \& Ankle Society (AOFAS) score from the baseline was observed at 12 months after injury on a scale of 0-100.
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Signs of healing on X-ray at 6 weeks
6 weeks
Signs of healing on X-ray at 12 months
6 weeks
Extremity loading
6 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Operational approach
EXPERIMENTALThe patients enrolled in this arm underwent surgical treatment of the Jones fracture.
Conservative approach
EXPERIMENTALThe patients enrolled in this arm were treated conservatively, using fixation of the injured extremity.
Interventions
Operational approach was used to treat the Jones fracture in patients randomized into the respective study arm.
Conservative approach was used to treat the Jones fracture in patients randomized into the respective study arm.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \- Jones fracture
You may not qualify if:
- combined injury
- recurring injury
- diabetes mellitus
- chronic renal insufficiency
- osteopathy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Hospital Ostrava
Ostrava, Moravian-Silesian Region, 70852, Czechia
Related Publications (11)
Dameron TB Jr. Fractures and anatomical variations of the proximal portion of the fifth metatarsal. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1975 Sep;57(6):788-92.
PMID: 1099103BACKGROUNDKavanaugh JH, Brower TD, Mann RV. The Jones fracture revisited. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978 Sep;60(6):776-82.
PMID: 701310BACKGROUNDLandorf KB. Clarifying proximal diaphyseal fifth metatarsal fractures. The acute fracture versus the stress fracture. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1999 Aug;89(8):398-404. doi: 10.7547/87507315-89-8-398.
PMID: 10466292BACKGROUNDMalkus T, Soukup B. [Jones fracture.]. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 1999;66(1):15-21. Czech.
PMID: 20478127BACKGROUNDMarshall PD, Evans PD, Richards J. Laboratory comparison of the cannulated Herbert bone screw with ASIF cancellous lag screws. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993 Jan;75(1):89-92. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.75B1.8421045.
PMID: 8421045BACKGROUNDMindrebo N, Shelbourne KD, Van Meter CD, Rettig AC. Outpatient percutaneous screw fixation of the acute Jones fracture. Am J Sports Med. 1993 Sep-Oct;21(5):720-3. doi: 10.1177/036354659302100514.
PMID: 8238714BACKGROUNDNunley JA. Fractures of the base of the fifth metatarsal: the Jones fracture. Orthop Clin North Am. 2001 Jan;32(1):171-80. doi: 10.1016/s0030-5898(05)70200-5.
PMID: 11465126BACKGROUNDPietropaoli MP, Wnorowski DC, Werner FW, Fortino MD. Intramedullary screw fixation of Jones fractures: a biomechanical study. Foot Ankle Int. 1999 Sep;20(9):560-3. doi: 10.1177/107110079902000904.
PMID: 10509682BACKGROUNDQuill GE Jr. Fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal. Orthop Clin North Am. 1995 Apr;26(2):353-61.
PMID: 7724197BACKGROUNDRosenberg GA, Sferra JJ. Treatment strategies for acute fractures and nonunions of the proximal fifth metatarsal. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2000 Sep-Oct;8(5):332-8. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200009000-00007.
PMID: 11029561BACKGROUNDSTEWART IM. Jones's fracture: fracture of base of fifth metatarsal. Clin Orthop. 1960;16:190-8. No abstract available.
PMID: 13834594BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jiří Demel, MD
University Hospital Ostrava
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Leopold Pleva, Ass.Prof.,MD,CSc.
University Hospital Ostrava
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- No masking was used in the study
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 26, 2019
First Posted
July 30, 2019
Study Start
January 1, 2006
Primary Completion
December 31, 2011
Study Completion
December 31, 2018
Last Updated
July 31, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The researchers do not plan to share individual participant data with other researchers.