NCT04036981

Brief Summary

Botulinum toxin A (BoNT A) has been reported to be effective in the treatment of elbow flexor spasticity. Although BoNT A is an efficacious treatment option, there is a debate in the selection of target muscle(s) for BoNT injection in the treatment of poststroke elbow flexor spasticity. The decision of muscle selection for BoNT A injection is mostly made according to the physical examination findings in real life practice.One of the guiding findings in this decision is the position of the spastic arm. In this study, hypothesis is that the change in severity of spasticity with BoNT A injection differs depending on the muscle selection in chronic stroke patients with elbow flexor and forearm pronator spasticity.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
55

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2019

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 10, 2019

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 25, 2019

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 30, 2019

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 3, 2021

Completed
29 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

June 23, 2021

Status Verified

June 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

July 25, 2019

Last Update Submit

June 18, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

StrokeMuscle spasticityBotulinum toxin A

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Dynamic Component of Spasticity (Spasticity Angle)

    According to the Modified Tardieu Scale, the difference between the angle of slow passive motion and the angle of muscle reaction represents the dynamic component of spasticity (spasticity angle) in degree. A big difference suggests spasticity while the low difference suggests muscular contracture. In this study, dynamic component of spasticity (spasticity angle) of elbow joint at forearm pronation position will be evaluated.

    up to 4 week

Study Arms (3)

Brachialis

Targeted muscle for BoNT A injection

Drug: Botulinum toxin type A

Biceps

Targeted muscle for BoNT A injection

Drug: Botulinum toxin type A

Brachialis plus Brachioradialis

Targeted muscles for BoNT A injection

Drug: Botulinum toxin type A

Interventions

Injection of botulinum toxin A into the spastic elbow flexor muscle or muscles

Also known as: Botox, Dysport
BicepsBrachialisBrachialis plus Brachioradialis

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Stroke patients with elbow flexor and forearm pronator spasticity

You may qualify if:

  • Chronic (equal to or upper than 1 year) stroke patients with position of elbow flexion and forearm pronation while standing or sitting
  • Grade 2 or 3 elbow flexor spasticity and grade 1 to 3 forearm pronator spasticity according to Modified Ashworth Scale
  • Stage 2 or 3 Brunnstrom's motor recovery stage of upper extremity
  • To agree to participate in the study

You may not qualify if:

  • \<18 years old
  • Pregnancy
  • Botulinum toxin injection within the last three months
  • Presence of elbow contracture
  • History of operation to spastic upper extremity
  • Spasticity due to other causes other than stroke
  • Do not agree to participate in the study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

İlker Şengül

Izmir, In the USA Or Canada, Please Select..., 35360, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (9)

  • Keenan MA. Management of the spastic upper extremity in the neurologically impaired adult. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988 Aug;(233):116-25.

    PMID: 3042230BACKGROUND
  • Genet F, Schnitzler A, Droz-Bartholet F, Salga M, Tatu L, Debaud C, Denormandie P, Parratte B. Successive motor nerve blocks to identify the muscles causing a spasticity pattern: example of the arm flexion pattern. J Anat. 2017 Jan;230(1):106-116. doi: 10.1111/joa.12538. Epub 2016 Sep 6.

    PMID: 27595994BACKGROUND
  • Keenan MA, Haider TT, Stone LR. Dynamic electromyography to assess elbow spasticity. J Hand Surg Am. 1990 Jul;15(4):607-14. doi: 10.1016/s0363-5023(09)90023-5.

    PMID: 2380525BACKGROUND
  • BASMAJIAN JV, LATIF A. Integrated actions and functions of the chief flexors of the elbow: a detailed electromyographic analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1957 Oct;39-A(5):1106-18. No abstract available.

    PMID: 13475410BACKGROUND
  • Bohannon RW, Smith MB. Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther. 1987 Feb;67(2):206-7. doi: 10.1093/ptj/67.2.206.

    PMID: 3809245BACKGROUND
  • Gracies JM, Bayle N, Vinti M, Alkandari S, Vu P, Loche CM, Colas C. Five-step clinical assessment in spastic paresis. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2010 Sep;46(3):411-21.

    PMID: 20927007BACKGROUND
  • Hefter H, Jost WH, Reissig A, Zakine B, Bakheit AM, Wissel J. Classification of posture in poststroke upper limb spasticity: a potential decision tool for botulinum toxin A treatment? Int J Rehabil Res. 2012 Sep;35(3):227-33. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0b013e328353e3d4.

    PMID: 22555318BACKGROUND
  • Simpson DM, Patel AT, Alfaro A, Ayyoub Z, Charles D, Dashtipour K, Esquenazi A, Graham GD, McGuire JR, Odderson I. OnabotulinumtoxinA Injection for Poststroke Upper-Limb Spasticity: Guidance for Early Injectors From a Delphi Panel Process. PM R. 2017 Feb;9(2):136-148. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2016.06.016. Epub 2016 Jun 23.

    PMID: 27346090BACKGROUND
  • Sengul I, Askin A, Tosun A. Effect of muscle selection for botulinum neurotoxin treatment on spasticity in patients with post-stroke elbow flexor muscle over-activity: an observational prospective study. Somatosens Mot Res. 2022 Mar;39(1):10-17. doi: 10.1080/08990220.2021.1986383. Epub 2021 Oct 10.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Muscle SpasticityStroke

Interventions

Botulinum Toxins, Type AabobotulinumtoxinA

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Muscular DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesMuscle HypertoniaNeuromuscular ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsCerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Botulinum ToxinsMetalloendopeptidasesEndopeptidasesPeptide HydrolasesHydrolasesEnzymesEnzymes and CoenzymesMetalloproteasesBacterial ProteinsProteinsAmino Acids, Peptides, and ProteinsBacterial ToxinsToxins, BiologicalBiological Factors

Study Officials

  • İlker Şengül, M.D.

    Izmir Katip Celebi University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE ONLY
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 25, 2019

First Posted

July 30, 2019

Study Start

May 10, 2019

Primary Completion

May 3, 2021

Study Completion

June 1, 2021

Last Updated

June 23, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations