Muscle Selection for Botulinum Toxin A Injection in Poststroke Elbow Flexor Spasticity
The Effect of Muscle Selection for Botulinum Toxin A Injection on the Treatment Outcome in Poststroke Elbow Flexor Spasticity
1 other identifier
observational
55
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Botulinum toxin A (BoNT A) has been reported to be effective in the treatment of elbow flexor spasticity. Although BoNT A is an efficacious treatment option, there is a debate in the selection of target muscle(s) for BoNT injection in the treatment of poststroke elbow flexor spasticity. The decision of muscle selection for BoNT A injection is mostly made according to the physical examination findings in real life practice.One of the guiding findings in this decision is the position of the spastic arm. In this study, hypothesis is that the change in severity of spasticity with BoNT A injection differs depending on the muscle selection in chronic stroke patients with elbow flexor and forearm pronator spasticity.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started May 2019
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 10, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 25, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 30, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 3, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2021
CompletedJune 23, 2021
June 1, 2021
2 years
July 25, 2019
June 18, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Dynamic Component of Spasticity (Spasticity Angle)
According to the Modified Tardieu Scale, the difference between the angle of slow passive motion and the angle of muscle reaction represents the dynamic component of spasticity (spasticity angle) in degree. A big difference suggests spasticity while the low difference suggests muscular contracture. In this study, dynamic component of spasticity (spasticity angle) of elbow joint at forearm pronation position will be evaluated.
up to 4 week
Study Arms (3)
Brachialis
Targeted muscle for BoNT A injection
Biceps
Targeted muscle for BoNT A injection
Brachialis plus Brachioradialis
Targeted muscles for BoNT A injection
Interventions
Injection of botulinum toxin A into the spastic elbow flexor muscle or muscles
Eligibility Criteria
Stroke patients with elbow flexor and forearm pronator spasticity
You may qualify if:
- Chronic (equal to or upper than 1 year) stroke patients with position of elbow flexion and forearm pronation while standing or sitting
- Grade 2 or 3 elbow flexor spasticity and grade 1 to 3 forearm pronator spasticity according to Modified Ashworth Scale
- Stage 2 or 3 Brunnstrom's motor recovery stage of upper extremity
- To agree to participate in the study
You may not qualify if:
- \<18 years old
- Pregnancy
- Botulinum toxin injection within the last three months
- Presence of elbow contracture
- History of operation to spastic upper extremity
- Spasticity due to other causes other than stroke
- Do not agree to participate in the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
İlker Şengül
Izmir, In the USA Or Canada, Please Select..., 35360, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (9)
Keenan MA. Management of the spastic upper extremity in the neurologically impaired adult. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988 Aug;(233):116-25.
PMID: 3042230BACKGROUNDGenet F, Schnitzler A, Droz-Bartholet F, Salga M, Tatu L, Debaud C, Denormandie P, Parratte B. Successive motor nerve blocks to identify the muscles causing a spasticity pattern: example of the arm flexion pattern. J Anat. 2017 Jan;230(1):106-116. doi: 10.1111/joa.12538. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
PMID: 27595994BACKGROUNDKeenan MA, Haider TT, Stone LR. Dynamic electromyography to assess elbow spasticity. J Hand Surg Am. 1990 Jul;15(4):607-14. doi: 10.1016/s0363-5023(09)90023-5.
PMID: 2380525BACKGROUNDBASMAJIAN JV, LATIF A. Integrated actions and functions of the chief flexors of the elbow: a detailed electromyographic analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1957 Oct;39-A(5):1106-18. No abstract available.
PMID: 13475410BACKGROUNDBohannon RW, Smith MB. Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther. 1987 Feb;67(2):206-7. doi: 10.1093/ptj/67.2.206.
PMID: 3809245BACKGROUNDGracies JM, Bayle N, Vinti M, Alkandari S, Vu P, Loche CM, Colas C. Five-step clinical assessment in spastic paresis. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2010 Sep;46(3):411-21.
PMID: 20927007BACKGROUNDHefter H, Jost WH, Reissig A, Zakine B, Bakheit AM, Wissel J. Classification of posture in poststroke upper limb spasticity: a potential decision tool for botulinum toxin A treatment? Int J Rehabil Res. 2012 Sep;35(3):227-33. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0b013e328353e3d4.
PMID: 22555318BACKGROUNDSimpson DM, Patel AT, Alfaro A, Ayyoub Z, Charles D, Dashtipour K, Esquenazi A, Graham GD, McGuire JR, Odderson I. OnabotulinumtoxinA Injection for Poststroke Upper-Limb Spasticity: Guidance for Early Injectors From a Delphi Panel Process. PM R. 2017 Feb;9(2):136-148. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2016.06.016. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
PMID: 27346090BACKGROUNDSengul I, Askin A, Tosun A. Effect of muscle selection for botulinum neurotoxin treatment on spasticity in patients with post-stroke elbow flexor muscle over-activity: an observational prospective study. Somatosens Mot Res. 2022 Mar;39(1):10-17. doi: 10.1080/08990220.2021.1986383. Epub 2021 Oct 10.
PMID: 34632927DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
İlker Şengül, M.D.
Izmir Katip Celebi University
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 25, 2019
First Posted
July 30, 2019
Study Start
May 10, 2019
Primary Completion
May 3, 2021
Study Completion
June 1, 2021
Last Updated
June 23, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share