Evaluating Lip Repositioning for the Treatment of Excess Gingival Display With and Without Pretreatment With Botox
1 other identifier
interventional
22
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Since the introduction of the lip repositioning procedure by a number of modifications to the technique have been introduced. All these modifications were made to prevent the main complication of lip repositioning surgeries 'relapse'. Relapse was found to occur in 8% of the cases treated . Botox injections have been suggested as a possible treatment for cases with relapse Botox acts by blocking muscular activity, however, Botulinum toxin technique has a transitory effect (6-7 months). . By combining Botox as a pretreatment and lip repositioning surgery, Botox injections maybe a useful adjunct in improving and stabilizing the results of achieved, by paralyzing the muscles during the healing period. There are no studies, to the investigator's knowledge, exploring the use of botox combined with lip repositioning to decrease muscle pull and therefore decrease the relapse.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_1
Started Sep 2019
Typical duration for phase_1
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 18, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 24, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 20, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 20, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 20, 2022
CompletedJuly 24, 2019
July 1, 2019
1 year
July 18, 2019
July 23, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
change in amount of gingival display
Amount of gingival display (from the inferior border of the upper lip vermillion border to the gingival margin of the central incisor) will be assessed from clinical photographs obtained during active smile, with a mm ruler in place
recorded at baseline, 3, 6 ,9 months and 1 year
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Patient satisfaction: quesionnaire
o The level of satisfaction during the followed periods (after two weeks, after two months, after six months)
Study Arms (2)
lip repositioning technique with Botox injection.
EXPERIMENTALBotulinum toxin produces partial chemical denervation of the muscle resulting in localized reduction in muscle activity (Binder et al., 1998). Therefore, the technique is a useful adjunct in the esthetic improvement of the smile and provides better results when combined with resective gingival surgery(Pedron \& Mangano, 2018).
lip repositioning technique.
ACTIVE COMPARATORLip repositioning aims to limit the retraction of elevator smile muscles. Lip repositioning results in a shallow vestibuler restricting of the muscle pull; Thereby limiting the gingival display during smiling.(Makkiah, 2017) It is a less invasive, viable substitute for patients, has fewer post-operative complications and provides a faster recovery compared to orthognathic surgery(Grover, Gupta, \& Luthra, 2014).
Interventions
Botulinum toxin produces partial chemical denervation of the muscle resulting in localized reduction in muscle activity
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Gummy smile more than 3mm.
- Adults \>18 years.
- Non-smokers.
- Patients with healthy systemic condition
- Normal clinical crown dimensions.
- Good oral hygiene.
You may not qualify if:
- Natural dentition upper anterior
- Pregnant or lactating women.
- Patients with inflamed gingiva or gingival enlargement.
- Inflammation or infection at the site of injection.
- Patients with allergy to botulinum toxin, lactose, and albumin.
- Concurrent use of aminoglycoside antibiotic that enhances the action of the toxin. (Jaspers, Pijpe, \& Jansma, 2011)
- \< 3 mm attached gingivae that might create difficulties in flap design, stabilization and suturing.
- Patients using anticholinesterase or other agents interfering with neuromuscular transmission
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Single blinded: Blinding of the participants is not applicable. Blinding of the operator is not applicable. Outcome assessor (primary and secondary outcomes) \& biostatistician will be blinded.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 18, 2019
First Posted
July 24, 2019
Study Start
September 20, 2019
Primary Completion
September 20, 2020
Study Completion
September 20, 2022
Last Updated
July 24, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-07