Flapless Esthetic Crown Lengthening for the Treatment of Excessive Gingival Display
Open-flap Versus Flapless Esthetic Crown Lengthening: 12-month Clinical Outcomes of a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
2 other identifiers
interventional
28
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of open-flap (OF) and flapless (FL) esthetic crown lengthening (ECL) for the treatment of excessive gingival display (EGD). It was hypothesized that the FL surgery would yield similar clinical results to the OF technique up to 12 months. Methods: A split-mouth randomized controlled trial will be conducted in 28 subjects presenting EGD. Contralateral quadrants will receive ECL using OF or FL techniques. Clinical parameters will be evaluated at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months post-surgeries. The local levels of receptor activator of NF-КB ligand (RANKL) and osteoprotegerin (OPG) will be assessed by ELISA at baseline and 3 months. Patients' perceptions regarding morbidity and esthetical appearance will be also evaluated. Periodontal tissue dimensions will be obtained by computed tomography at baseline and correlated with the changes in the gingival margin (GM).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2011
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 26, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 29, 2013
CompletedApril 2, 2013
March 1, 2013
1.5 years
March 26, 2013
March 29, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Mean changes in gingival margin
Baseline to 3, 6 and 12 months
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Visible plaque accumulation
Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months
Marginal bleeding
Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months
Bleeding on probing
Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months
Probing depth
Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months
Clinical attachment level
Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Flapless
ACTIVE COMPARATORFlapless: Gingivectomy and osteoplasty, as necessary, will be performed without flap elevation.
Open-flap
ACTIVE COMPARATORGingivectomy and osteoplasty, as necessary, will be performed with flap elevation
Interventions
Open-flap(control group; n=28 sides/105 teeth): An internal beveled incision was performed at the buccal aspect of the involved teeth. Afterwards, a sulcular incision was completed to allow gingival tissue removal. A full-thickness mucoperiosteal flap was reflected to remove and remodel bone tissue by means of surgical chisels, as necessary, until a 3mm distance was achieved between the bone crest and the cement-enamel junction (CEJ). The exposed root surfaces were carefully planed with curettes. Interrupted sutures were performed at the papilla to allow GM stabilization in the CEJ position.
FL (test group; n=28 sides/105 teeth): Internal beveled and sulcular incisions and gingival tissue removal were performed as above described for the control group, replacing the GM in the CEJ position. However, the alveolar bone was removed and remodeled, as necessary, using micro chisels, via incisions, without flap elevation. The root surfaces were also carefully planed via incisions. The required distance of 3mm between the bone crest and the CEJ was checked by inserting a periodontal probe into the incision. Sutures were not performed.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- esthetic concerns regarding excessive gingival display due to altered passive eruption in at least three upper teeth (incisors, lateral, canines or premolars) per half contralateral quadrant.
- \> 21 years old,
- at least 20 teeth
- no sites with attachment loss and probing depth (PD) \> 3 mm
- full-mouth plaque, bleeding on probing (BoP) and marginal bleeding (MB) index scores of \< 15%
You may not qualify if:
- pregnancy
- lactation
- history of smoking
- antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory therapies in the previous 2 months
- previous mucogingival surgery at the region to be treated
- systemic conditions that could affect tissue healing (e.g. diabetes)
- use of orthodontic appliances
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Guarulhos University
Guarulhos, São Paulo, 07023-070, Brazil
Related Publications (5)
Levine RA, McGuire M. The diagnosis and treatment of the gummy smile. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1997 Aug;18(8):757-62, 764; quiz 766.
PMID: 9533335BACKGROUNDSilberberg N, Goldstein M, Smidt A. Excessive gingival display--etiology, diagnosis, and treatment modalities. Quintessence Int. 2009 Nov-Dec;40(10):809-18.
PMID: 19898712BACKGROUNDRossi R, Benedetti R, Santos-Morales RI. Treatment of altered passive eruption: periodontal plastic surgery of the dentogingival junction. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2008 Autumn;3(3):212-23.
PMID: 19655539BACKGROUNDRethman MP, Harrel SK. Minimally invasive periodontal therapy: will periodontal therapy remain a technologic laggard? J Periodontol. 2010 Oct;81(10):1390-5. doi: 10.1902/jop.2010.100150.
PMID: 20476885BACKGROUNDMalkinson S, Waldrop TC, Gunsolley JC, Lanning SK, Sabatini R. The effect of esthetic crown lengthening on perceptions of a patient's attractiveness, friendliness, trustworthiness, intelligence, and self-confidence. J Periodontol. 2013 Aug;84(8):1126-33. doi: 10.1902/jop.2012.120403. Epub 2012 Nov 9.
PMID: 23137007BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Poliana M Duarte, DDS
Guarulhos University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 26, 2013
First Posted
March 29, 2013
Study Start
January 1, 2011
Primary Completion
July 1, 2012
Study Completion
July 1, 2012
Last Updated
April 2, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-03