NCT01821157

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of open-flap (OF) and flapless (FL) esthetic crown lengthening (ECL) for the treatment of excessive gingival display (EGD). It was hypothesized that the FL surgery would yield similar clinical results to the OF technique up to 12 months. Methods: A split-mouth randomized controlled trial will be conducted in 28 subjects presenting EGD. Contralateral quadrants will receive ECL using OF or FL techniques. Clinical parameters will be evaluated at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months post-surgeries. The local levels of receptor activator of NF-КB ligand (RANKL) and osteoprotegerin (OPG) will be assessed by ELISA at baseline and 3 months. Patients' perceptions regarding morbidity and esthetical appearance will be also evaluated. Periodontal tissue dimensions will be obtained by computed tomography at baseline and correlated with the changes in the gingival margin (GM).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
28

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2011

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2011

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2012

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2012

Completed
9 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 26, 2013

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 29, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

April 2, 2013

Status Verified

March 1, 2013

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

March 26, 2013

Last Update Submit

March 29, 2013

Conditions

Keywords

crown lengtheninggingivoplastysurgical proceduresgingivectomyesthetic surgery

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Mean changes in gingival margin

    Baseline to 3, 6 and 12 months

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • Visible plaque accumulation

    Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months

  • Marginal bleeding

    Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months

  • Bleeding on probing

    Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months

  • Probing depth

    Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months

  • Clinical attachment level

    Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Flapless

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Flapless: Gingivectomy and osteoplasty, as necessary, will be performed without flap elevation.

Procedure: Flapless

Open-flap

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Gingivectomy and osteoplasty, as necessary, will be performed with flap elevation

Procedure: Open-flap

Interventions

Open-flapPROCEDURE

Open-flap(control group; n=28 sides/105 teeth): An internal beveled incision was performed at the buccal aspect of the involved teeth. Afterwards, a sulcular incision was completed to allow gingival tissue removal. A full-thickness mucoperiosteal flap was reflected to remove and remodel bone tissue by means of surgical chisels, as necessary, until a 3mm distance was achieved between the bone crest and the cement-enamel junction (CEJ). The exposed root surfaces were carefully planed with curettes. Interrupted sutures were performed at the papilla to allow GM stabilization in the CEJ position.

Open-flap
FlaplessPROCEDURE

FL (test group; n=28 sides/105 teeth): Internal beveled and sulcular incisions and gingival tissue removal were performed as above described for the control group, replacing the GM in the CEJ position. However, the alveolar bone was removed and remodeled, as necessary, using micro chisels, via incisions, without flap elevation. The root surfaces were also carefully planed via incisions. The required distance of 3mm between the bone crest and the CEJ was checked by inserting a periodontal probe into the incision. Sutures were not performed.

Flapless

Eligibility Criteria

Age21 Years - 35 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • esthetic concerns regarding excessive gingival display due to altered passive eruption in at least three upper teeth (incisors, lateral, canines or premolars) per half contralateral quadrant.
  • \> 21 years old,
  • at least 20 teeth
  • no sites with attachment loss and probing depth (PD) \> 3 mm
  • full-mouth plaque, bleeding on probing (BoP) and marginal bleeding (MB) index scores of \< 15%

You may not qualify if:

  • pregnancy
  • lactation
  • history of smoking
  • antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory therapies in the previous 2 months
  • previous mucogingival surgery at the region to be treated
  • systemic conditions that could affect tissue healing (e.g. diabetes)
  • use of orthodontic appliances

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Guarulhos University

Guarulhos, São Paulo, 07023-070, Brazil

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Levine RA, McGuire M. The diagnosis and treatment of the gummy smile. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1997 Aug;18(8):757-62, 764; quiz 766.

    PMID: 9533335BACKGROUND
  • Silberberg N, Goldstein M, Smidt A. Excessive gingival display--etiology, diagnosis, and treatment modalities. Quintessence Int. 2009 Nov-Dec;40(10):809-18.

    PMID: 19898712BACKGROUND
  • Rossi R, Benedetti R, Santos-Morales RI. Treatment of altered passive eruption: periodontal plastic surgery of the dentogingival junction. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2008 Autumn;3(3):212-23.

    PMID: 19655539BACKGROUND
  • Rethman MP, Harrel SK. Minimally invasive periodontal therapy: will periodontal therapy remain a technologic laggard? J Periodontol. 2010 Oct;81(10):1390-5. doi: 10.1902/jop.2010.100150.

    PMID: 20476885BACKGROUND
  • Malkinson S, Waldrop TC, Gunsolley JC, Lanning SK, Sabatini R. The effect of esthetic crown lengthening on perceptions of a patient's attractiveness, friendliness, trustworthiness, intelligence, and self-confidence. J Periodontol. 2013 Aug;84(8):1126-33. doi: 10.1902/jop.2012.120403. Epub 2012 Nov 9.

    PMID: 23137007BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Gingival Overgrowth

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Gingival DiseasesPeriodontal DiseasesMouth DiseasesStomatognathic Diseases

Study Officials

  • Poliana M Duarte, DDS

    Guarulhos University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 26, 2013

First Posted

March 29, 2013

Study Start

January 1, 2011

Primary Completion

July 1, 2012

Study Completion

July 1, 2012

Last Updated

April 2, 2013

Record last verified: 2013-03

Locations