Study of CT and MR in the Gastric Cancer
Clinical Study of CT and MR in Staging and Prediction of Response in Patients With Gastric Cancer
1 other identifier
observational
400
1 country
1
Brief Summary
It is very significant that assessing staging in gastric cancer patients before surgery, furthermore, determining the optimize surgical strategy ,predict the the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy for patients. For patients who are ineffective in neoadjuvant therapy, surgery will be more meaningful. It has been reported that the application of CT(computed tomography,CT) and MR(magnetic resonance,MR) in staging of gastric cancer, but not in predicting clinical response to neoadjuvant therapy for gastric cancer. Only a few studies focused on T staging using conventional MRI in gastric cancer, however , relatively new sequences in the chest deserve widely used. To develop a pre-treatment evaluation methods for TN staging in patient with gastric cancer by utilization of the new imaging methods (T2-TSE-BLADE,T2 maps, StarVIBE, iShim-DWI and high resolution CT). By analysing the relationship between TN staging and imaging features to find the imaging characteristics for TN staging, and to find the indicators of new technology and reference values for facilitate pre-treatment diagnosis of TN staging, optimize surgical strategy , predict the the efficacy of adjunctive therapy , and OS and define the range of lymph node for radiotherapy , as making personal treatment planning for gastric cancer .
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Sep 2019
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 17, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 22, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2023
CompletedApril 1, 2020
July 1, 2019
4.3 years
July 17, 2019
March 31, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
MSCT and MRI staging in Gastric Cancer.
To evaluate the staging of gastric cancer treated with systematic therapy through MSCT and 3 T MRI which using multiple sequences.
up to 2 year
Secondary Outcomes (1)
MSCT and MRI prediction of prognosis in gastric cancer
up to 2 year
Interventions
No intervention
Eligibility Criteria
Subjects with endoscopically biopsy-proven gastric cancer will receive treatment
You may qualify if:
- Consecutive patients with preoperative pathologically con-firmed gastric cancer by endoscopy and preoperative imaging data (esophagography\\CT\\EUS\\MRI) were included.
- No contraindications for MRI examination. No contraindications contrast.
- The patients participate in this study with informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- The patients couldn't performed MSCT or MR scanning or artefacts affect the evaluation.
- The patients are extremely anxious and uncooperative about surgery or neoadjuvant therapy .
- PatientsThe patients refuse to participate in the project.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Henan Cancer Hospital
Zhengzhou, China
Related Publications (8)
Giganti F, Tang L, Baba H. Gastric cancer and imaging biomarkers: Part 1 - a critical review of DW-MRI and CE-MDCT findings. Eur Radiol. 2019 Apr;29(4):1743-1753. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5732-4. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
PMID: 30280246BACKGROUNDPang L, Wang J, Fan Y, Xu R, Bai Y, Bai L. Correlations of TNM staging and lymph node metastasis of gastric cancer with MRI features and VEGF expression. Cancer Biomark. 2018;23(1):53-59. doi: 10.3233/CBM-181287.
PMID: 30010108BACKGROUNDBorggreve AS, Goense L, Brenkman HJF, Mook S, Meijer GJ, Wessels FJ, Verheij M, Jansen EPM, van Hillegersberg R, van Rossum PSN, Ruurda JP. Imaging strategies in the management of gastric cancer: current role and future potential of MRI. Br J Radiol. 2019 May;92(1097):20181044. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20181044. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
PMID: 30789792BACKGROUNDZhou J, Shen J, Seifer BJ, Jiang S, Wang J, Xiong H, Xie L, Wang L, Sui X. Approaches and genetic determinants in predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer. Oncotarget. 2017 May 2;8(18):30477-30494. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.12955.
PMID: 27802185BACKGROUNDKwee RM, Kwee TC. Role of imaging in predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Feb 21;20(7):1650-6. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i7.1650.
PMID: 24587644BACKGROUNDNg J, Lee P. The Role of Radiotherapy in Localized Esophageal and Gastric Cancer. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2017 Jun;31(3):453-468. doi: 10.1016/j.hoc.2017.01.005. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
PMID: 28501087BACKGROUNDAl-Batran SE, Homann N, Pauligk C, Illerhaus G, Martens UM, Stoehlmacher J, Schmalenberg H, Luley KB, Prasnikar N, Egger M, Probst S, Messmann H, Moehler M, Fischbach W, Hartmann JT, Mayer F, Hoffkes HG, Koenigsmann M, Arnold D, Kraus TW, Grimm K, Berkhoff S, Post S, Jager E, Bechstein W, Ronellenfitsch U, Monig S, Hofheinz RD. Effect of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Surgical Resection on Survival in Patients With Limited Metastatic Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer: The AIO-FLOT3 Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2017 Sep 1;3(9):1237-1244. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.0515.
PMID: 28448662BACKGROUNDLi J, Yan LL, Zhang HK, Wang Y, Xu SN, Chen XJ, Qu JR. Application of intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging for preoperative knowledge of lymphovascular invasion in gastric cancer: a prospective study. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2023 Jul;48(7):2207-2218. doi: 10.1007/s00261-023-03920-2. Epub 2023 Apr 21.
PMID: 37085731DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 17, 2019
First Posted
July 22, 2019
Study Start
September 1, 2019
Primary Completion
December 1, 2023
Study Completion
December 1, 2023
Last Updated
April 1, 2020
Record last verified: 2019-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share